It's not irrelevant if the whole argument is about whether the technology behind the function is different, which was what I was responding to.
I believe that the original argument was that there wasn't a continuity violation with TOS because the technology was different between the Romulan cloaking device in BoT and the Klingon cloak in DSC (and that was just a hypothesis based only on the fact that the Klingon ship flickered). And I pointed out that the tech was irrelevant because the tech had nothing to do with the argument. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, a ship that could make itself invisible was unknown to Kirk and Spock. Spock even argues about how it could theoretically be possible. But ten years before, Starfleet already knew that Klingon ships could be invisible. Several Starfleet ships were destroyed precisely because they were attacked by ships that could turn invisible. So yes, there's a continuity violation here, whether certain people want to believe it or not, or rationalize it away with some BS.