Oscar complained?Oscar Isaac complained to JJ saying he played "that part" before and so they wrote him back into the third act, taking down the TIEs on Maz's world and destroying Starkiller.
Oscar complained?
I read that the crew liked his character so much they extended his role.
“Originally Poe was going to die early on in the film, and that was the script that Oscar saw,” Abrams says in the upcoming documentary on the making of The Force Awakens.
“One of his issues was that he had made four movies in which he had died early on. And he was sick of dying early on.”
Isaac elaborates: “A week or so later, JJ wrote to me and said ‘We’ve got it figured out, Poe’s in the rest of the movie now’. And so this idea that Poe comes back was added later. Which obviously for me was incredibly exciting and fantastic, I get to live.”
Probably.Hopefully he'll switch personalities from the BEAST back to Poe and go back to being a friendly and trustworthy team player who's good at his job.
Except Poe never "charged in like a brash hothead" in The Force Awakens.
Ex Machina was a great movie. It still amazes that a movie which is mostly 4 people sitting alone in a house talking, can be so compelling.I only want him to dance.
![]()
It's called hubris. The idea of overconfidence due to a past success and exposes a weakness. It is a common trope that has existed in fiction since ancient Greece, at least. It's been visited in Star Wars in some ways before:Well, it is bad writing when a completely competent and trustworthy character is suddenly an ignorant mutineer who enacts a plan which results in his organization suffering deaths of 90% of its membership. TFA Poe would not have done that, and TLJ takes place over the span of a day or so afterwards.
It's not having multiple facets, it's the storytelling equivalent of dissociative identity disorder. He became a completely different persona, and in a purely negative and destructive way, in the span of a few hours. It's not like he just decided "I'm not feeling it today" and stayed home from work. That would be understandable.So what? How is it realistic or interesting for a character to behave exactly the same way in every situation? Whence this bizarre notion that a character having multiple facets is bad writing?
How is he a misogynist?
Disobeying a direct order from Leia to return to the ship and call off the attack, another court martial offense and his first of two mutinies (both against female superiors, which he's suddenly got a problem with) of the film.
Then he judges Admiral Holdo negatively strictly based on her appearance (dress, elaborate hairstyle) even though he knows her exceptional combat record and recites it by memory, Leia clearly considers Holdo an equal, and she has done absolutely nothing to earn his distrust at this point. This is before the compartmentalized information about the escape plan, which she is not required to share with a subordinate, but at least it's some motivation for his shitty berhavior other than just suddenly being a sexist asshole out of nowhere, despite serving with Leia for years, who I've heard on good authority is not opposed to occasionally wearing long flowing dresses and elaborate hairstyles on duty as well.
It sounds like he could be talking about this cringeworthy comment. From https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/movie_script.php?movie=star-wars-episode-viii-the-last-jedi
That's Admiral Holdo?
Battle of Chyron Belt, Admiral Holdo?
Not what I expected.
To clarify my meaning, the dialog is cringeworthy because its writing is ham-fisted. The dialog seems crafted to lampshade issues that members of the audience might have with the character. Ninety-nine times out 100, that form of lampshading is executed in a ham-fisted manner.Cringeworthy as to poorly written? Sure.
Cringeworthy as to being misogynistic? Eh?
To clarify my meaning, the dialog is cringeworthy because its writing is ham-fisted.
The dialog seems crafted to lampshade issues that members of the audience might have with the character. Ninety-nine times out 100, that form of lampshading is executed in a ham-fisted manner.
The other shoe drops when you ask yourself what issues are being lampshaded.
Granted, neither prejudice nor failure to have expectations met necessarily translate into misogyny, but why is Poe even making the comment? He's met Leia, right? Those questions only reinforce reading it as lampshading and not really having anything to do with Poe as a character.
Touche.Hamfisted dialogue? Almost like we're watching a Star Wars movie.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.