• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Alex Kurtzman Gets New Deal With CBS, Will Expand 'Star Trek' TV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Perfectly said. Discovery was an instantly available target for the ire of every TOS fandamentalist and 24th-century-or-bust stalwart that had soured over years of not getting things exactly their way. They inhabit an echo chamber that gives them support and causes them to assume that their umwelt is in fact some universal truth. There was and is absolutely nothing that show runners can do to break through that level of toxicity except to bulldoze over it and embrace new viewers and keep providing a good show for the existing fans.

You can't win with those people. If you cater to them you're accused of fanwank. If you chart your own course you're accused of apostasy against St Gene. If you make the barest most subtlest of hints you're bringing an old cast member back you're instantly told your project is doomed. If you get your show renewed, you'll be told you're not getting renewed again.

Yep. No different when the Kelvinverse films premiered either. Same exact highly predictable and tiresome behavior.
 
Hey if you want to characterize a total lack of sense, logic, or coherence as nerdrage nitpicking that is up to you. I look at it as few to none of the main characters motivations and actions making any sense. I didn't set out to dislike STID, and I didn't intend on nitpicking it, it's simply that beyond the veneer of action, conflict, and raw emotion, the movie just isn't any good. Burying your head in the sand and ignoring the real quality issues, dismissing them as fannish nitpicking demonstrates true fanboy activity.

You may have truly enjoyed the movie, but you can't seriously argue these are not problems with the movie.

The movie is filled with idiotic nonsense.




Doesn't mean I don't enjoy watching it for the good it contains either.

That's not being a fanboy. That's being a normal human.
 
Still not nearly enough and definitely not recently.

I'll be inviting a few friends over to watch a film of hers at some point...
Silkwood. Mamma Mia. Julia & Julia. Adaptation. A Cry In the Dark. Defending Your Life. And so, so many others!... You'll find your own favorites. ;)
 
Interesting news. My instant reaction is they know Discovery is a failure that cannot be remedied (particularly if half of S2 is the same low-yield pap) and might not even see Season 3. Hence putting out news of a whole slew of new concepts, some of which may be a trial balloon to see how fans react.

Kurtzman's involvement doesn't bother me; somehow I don't think he was responsible for the worst decisions of the JJprise movies or certainly the DISC trainwreck.

Looking forward to what they come up with.
 
Interesting news. My instant reaction is they know Discovery is a failure that cannot be remedied (particularly if half of S2 is the same low-yield pap) and might not even see Season 3. Hence putting out news of a whole slew of new concepts, some of which may be a trial balloon to see how fans react.
Yes, because when something's a failure is when Hollywood tends to go all in on a franchise.:rolleyes:

Dislike Discovery all you want but it's clearly considered a success by CBS.
 
- Spock and Kirk have known each other for about 12-18 months, part of that time hating each other - but Spock reacts (and the audience is supposted to react) as though they have had a 15 year friendship?

This bit bothers me as well. It's not even just the length of time they'd known each other, but how Kirk actually is. Based on the events in the timeline, Kirk is not the same character he was in the original. I don't think Spock could have developed anywhere near as much respect for this Kirk based on his actions and character to date at he would for prime Kirk.
 
This is another one of those scenarios where Discovery cannot win - if we'd had no other new Trek, it would be because Discovery was a failure. If we do get new Trek, it's because Discovery is a failure.
I'd think if they thought Discovery was a failure, why would they sign the guy involved in developing Discovery (the first person hired in the process of making the series, the one who found Fuller to develop it further) to continue to develop Star Trek for them.

But hey, what I do know: Literally nothing.
 
It's certainly not a failure. It's hitting CBS's targets. It's simply a far more limited and uncertain success than its fans like to insist.

Pretty soon we'll start hearing about "Parrot Analytics" around here. ;)
 
Yes, because when something's a failure is when Hollywood tends to go all in on a franchise.:rolleyes:

Dislike Discovery all you want but it's clearly considered a success by CBS.

Evidence?

There are many reasons to go all-in on Trek that have nothing to with DISC. In fact, one would be to make sure that other projects are in the hopper if/when DISC fails.
 
I'd think if they thought Discovery was a failure, why would they sign the guy involved in developing Discovery (the first person hired in the process of making the series, the one who found Fuller to develop it further) to continue to develop Star Trek for them.

But hey, what I do know: Literally nothing.

If all is going swimmingly with DISC, why the Harberts/Berg firings? I don't think Kurtzman's had much to do with the show, and in fact I think that's part of his appeal!
 
If all is going swimmingly with DISC, why the Harberts/Berg firings? I don't think Kurtzman's had much to do with the show, and in fact I think that's part of his appeal!
Kurtzmann's company produces Discovery. He hasn't had a lot involved creatively or the day-to-day, but the expansion of his role indicates faith in him as a producer, which suggests faith in the product he produced. After all he probably won't be involved as a showrunner on any of the four new shows - the Starfleet Academy one even has a named team who are developing it.

(Obviously, there isn't similar faith in the Discovery showrunners; but for all the chaos behind the scenes, the show was, from what I've read, widely streamed show.)
 
As I said before, CBS indicated before Discovery premiered that regardless of the success or failure of Discovery, they were planning to make more Trek content. Thus I don't think we can conclude anything about the success or failure of DIS by CBS's own internal metrics. I do think the likely significant dropoff in All Access subscriptions as soon as DIS was over made them conclude they needed MOAR TREK as soon as possible though.
 
I can't figure out whether Kurtzman is some figurehead with no creative control or the prime architect of Discovery. Oh, well. I hope it gets better and these new shows are good.
 
If all is going swimmingly with DISC, why the Harberts/Berg firings?

Obviously I have no personal knowledge of the situation, but rumor has it that Harberts and Berg were douche bags to the rest of the writers/staff and when word finally got back to the PTB they canned them for it.

:shrug:.

Might not be the whole story, but it makes sense as far as it goes (similar rumors persist about some of the early TNG BTS staffers).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top