Same here.The Yuuzhan Vong series did more to kill my love of Star Wars than a thousand Canto Bights...
What a disaster that was, and the books that followed it - ugh.
I was glad to see the EU go....
Same here.The Yuuzhan Vong series did more to kill my love of Star Wars than a thousand Canto Bights...
What a disaster that was, and the books that followed it - ugh.
I was glad to see the EU go....
I don't like those movies, but that's just unforgivable.There were people gloating that his daughter died and he had to step off, it was pretty fucking abominable.
And that was basically just a culmination of years of normalizied shit flinging at him, not just by random people in comments but by bloggers and "news" outlets.
Just give them time, they'll do it too. This all comes from the same place, the ideas that fans own the source material, are owed something from the people who make it and that they know it better than the people who are making it. Which given enough time is actually made by fellow fans. Star Wars, Star Trek, Doctor Who, pretty much any franchise a few decades old are all being made by people who grew up as fans and were able to get into a position where they could work on it. I wonder if part of it is jealousy. The reaction to these fan writers generally seems nastier than with others. It's toxic and it's really what's killing Star Wars and other franchises. It isn't Kathleen Kennedy, Disney, SJWs, women, porgs, etc., it's a group of fans who think the entire world is trying to take away Star Wars from them and they will attack anyone and everyone they see as a threat and it is everyone who isn't exactly like them. They're doing everything they can to kill Star Wars because it isn't the Star Wars they grew up with, which isn't possible to make. They aren't remembering Star Wars, they're remembering childhood and they'll never be able to recreate that. So even assuming their delusions came true and Kennedy got fired, they would just hate whoever replaced her and the one who replaced them and so on until their hate filled lives finally end.Cheering the death of someone's child because you don't like their movies is a level of heinous still not yet reached by the SW fandom, though that's probably just through sheer luck of nobody actually dying.
And all this hate and bile was coming from people claiming they know and own what "True Superman" is...
I kind of lumped all of that together - the hand-drawn cartoons and the CG series. I didn't care as much for the mystical stuff, but the slow development of the clones and their ambivalent relationship with the Jedi was fantastic.I also liked the Clone Wars series, especially the episodes that delved into the mysteries of "The Force."
Kor
Are the X-Wing novels also bad?
Are the X-Wing novels also bad?
Same here.
Ping - lightbulb moment !This all comes from the same place, the ideas that fans own the source material, are owed something from the people who make it and that they know it better than the people who are making it. Which given enough time is actually made by fellow fans. Star Wars, Star Trek, Doctor Who, pretty much any franchise a few decades old are all being made by people who grew up as fans and were able to get into a position where they could work on it.
I wonder if part of it is jealousy.
I find the correlation between the "fire JJ Abrams and Star Trek is dead" crown and the "fire Kathleen Kennedy and Star Wars is dead" crowd to be rather depressing.
She is interesting, engaging, charming, intelligent, and Daisy Ridley BELIEVES in the power of Star Wars and is able to carry herself with dignity and grace while zipping through a hellish character arc (seriously Rey has been abandoned/betrayed by EVERYONE she ever believed in, and yet still has held to her inner beliefs and principles).
Like who?
This all comes from the same place, the ideas that fans own the source material, are owed something from the people who make it and that they know it better than the people who are making it.
Which given enough time is actually made by fellow fans. Star Wars, Star Trek, Doctor Who, pretty much any franchise a few decades old are all being made by people who grew up as fans and were able to get into a position where they could work on it. I wonder if part of it is jealousy. The reaction to these fan writers generally seems nastier than with others.
To me the animus seems to be more to the people who admit they weren't big fans of the series before being hired for it (Berman and Abrams in ST, Singer for X-Men, kind of Burton for Batman and maybe Snyder for Superman). Braga and Orci/Kurtzman for ST seem rare when fan writers are pretty attacked.
Yes, but they don't devote their lives to tearing it apart. We've seen a lot of shitty shows and movies, so I quit watching them. I don't keep watching so I can complain about why it isn't better. I don't like The Expansion, but I have no desire to sit in the threads for it to shit on it and it's fans. That's the problem.Don't all critics and most viewers feel they are owed a good product in exchange for their money and time? Why is it an absurd idea that someone who has read or seen a lot of the source material for years would know more about it than someone hired to make a film?
Why would you give a shit? An outside perspective could bring something new and create something great. Harve Bennett & Nicholas Meyer had never seen Star Trek before working on Wrath of Khan. Talented people are talented people, no matter if they're a fan or not. Love of a product doesn't make anyone more qualified to work on it.To me the animus seems to be more to the people who admit they weren't big fans of the series before being hired for it (Berman and Abrams in ST, Singer for X-Men, kind of Burton for Batman and maybe Snyder for Superman). Braga and Orci/Kurtzman for ST seem rare when fan writers are pretty attacked.
The surest way for a movie to end up being a big, incestuous mess of self-referential rubbish is for the production to be dominated by rabid fans of the property who can't approach it from a standpoint of professional objectivity.
Don't all critics and most viewers feel they are owed a good product in exchange for their money and time? Why is it an absurd idea that someone who has read or seen a lot of the source material for years would know more about it than someone hired to make a film?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.