Same here.God I hope SM-G goes on to have a remarkable award-winning career, just because of all the shitposts in this thread.
Same here.God I hope SM-G goes on to have a remarkable award-winning career, just because of all the shitposts in this thread.
Sadly, yes.You know, I remember when NuBSG came out and all the disgruntled "fans" were screaming and frothing about how "OMG STARBUCK IS A WOMEN!! HOW DARE THEY!!!" and how that kind of damn bullshit went on for nearly the entire run of the series. I also remember thinking to myself, thank god I'm a star trek fan, because Trekkies would NEVER act that way towards women or POC.
I was wrong...
LOL, your placing of Lorca as more reprehensible than a mass murdering tyrant who served Burnham a murdered Kelpian for dinner tells me all I need to know about you as well. You seem to be OK with that, most likely because the mass murderer is a female POC, which is all that matters to the SJW crowd.Well your derogatory use of the term "SJW" and little alt-right screed tells all I need to know about your opinion - that its not worth a frak.
But hey we all get it, you hate women in lead roles.
LOL, your placing of Lorca as more reprehensible than a mass murdering tyrant who served Burnham a murdered Kelpian for dinner tells me all I need to know about you as well. You seem to be OK with that, most likely because the mass murderer is a female POC, which is all that matters to the SJW crowd.
SJW is an apt description. It can signify, for example, a person who doesn't view a person's actions but rather just always automatically direct their blame towards straight white men. They claim to be fighting bigotry and prejudice, but could pretty much have their picture placed in the dictionary next to the definitions, because they judge everything based upon what ethnic group / orientation / etc. that someone is.
They are cultural Marxists, who divide society into false groupings of "oppressed" and "oppressors", and in their hate-filled world even a dirt poor white from the Appalachians is "priviledged" and should be punished for it.
Oh and BTW, Doctor Who's a girl now...
you use that word as if it were a bad thing.Marxists
Look, this is the situation, I don't care if you originally watched episode one of TOS live and ever Trek episode thereafter. I don't care if you've attended every con, cruise and fan meet-up. I don't care if you have ever model and costume and comic book. YOU DO NOT OWN STAR TREK!! Period. As a women of color I deserve to see a lead in that series that looks like me, that I can identify with. One of the best moments watching the cast members show up to the Hollywood screening of Discovery, joined by former cast members, was Nichelle Nichols passing the torch to Sonequa Martin-Green and telling her "Treks yours now" the other was seeing Michelle Yeoh reaction to young Asian women cosplayed as her character. And those girls finally having a character they can identify with.
Representation fucking matters. Michael Burnham matters. And the fact that so many of you cannot see that...it's sad really.
Says the guy who just marginalized an entire group of people based on hyperbole and generalization.Indeed so, and before that "The Master" became "Missy". You probably think that it in some way disturbed me, because in the hate-filled world of a SJW, everything is weighed by race / sex / orientation.
I enjoy Dr. Who, and still enjoy Dr. Who. Unlike people like you, their gender or race doesn't matter to me. SJWs are the bigots and fascists trying to shut down free speech and divide society based upon race and sex, not me.
I just learned you have to use that word at least twice before it countsFucking
Marxist is a bad thing. They have murdered more innocent people than all other political philosophies combined.you use that word as if it were a bad thing.
also, cut the SJW crap, honestly. the usage of that term is like tattooing 'right-wing extremist nutjob' on your forehead, nobody will take you seriously
Could we pretty please not bring politics into this. I'm to the left of Bernie Sanders and I actually agree with Feron on many of his critiques of the show when he doesn't see everything through some weird ideological lens.
Finally depicting a same-sex relationship aside, I don't see anything particularly more "progressive" about this incarnation of Trek from earlier versions.
go on, make me laugh, try to define itMarxist is a bad thing.
Marx·istgo on, make me laugh, try to define it
And I agree with you that so far aside from the Stamets / Culber relationship (which I am completely cool with, BTW) that there has been very little truly progressive in this show. In fact, if the producers had self-identified as conservative to the viewing crowd, I am sure that a number of things would have been loudly protested.
A Pakistani guy portrays a character who is secretly an evil terrorist / spy inside?
The exaggerated features of the new Klingons?
LOL, I have never claimed to "own" Star Trek.Look, this is the situation, I don't care if you originally watched episode one of TOS live and ever Trek episode thereafter. I don't care if you've attended every con, cruise and fan meet-up. I don't care if you have ever model and costume and comic book. YOU DO NOT OWN STAR TREK!! Period. As a women of color I deserve to see a lead in that series that looks like me, that I can identify with. One of the best moments watching the cast members show up to the Hollywood screening of Discovery, joined by former cast members, was Nichelle Nichols passing the torch to Sonequa Martin-Green and telling her "Treks yours now" the other was seeing Michelle Yeoh reaction to young Asian women cosplayed as her character. And those girls finally having a character they can identify with.
Representation fucking matters. Michael Burnham matters. And the fact that so many of you cannot see that...it's sad really.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.