The motto is universal. Just change one word and it could work for Discovery too:
Space: the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Discovery. Its continuing mission: to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no one has gone before.
Not really. I said I enjoy Discovery and I do. At the same time, I can still wish that parts of the show were different. There was a lot of good about Old Trek too. Not all of it needs to be rejected.
Yeah, but it wasn't DS9's mission either. They were at a crossroads, so while they did see new life and new civilizations, that life generally came to them. Their mission was prep Bajor for induction and hold down that corner of (future) Federation space.
I didn't take it as either being comfortable in their locations so much as disoriented and unaware of where they were.
I too heard the Stamets aboard the MU flagship mutter "I did it!" right after he awoke, but in the context of the scene this is immediately after Culber tells Prime!Stamets that all he has to do to return to his body is open his eyes. Cue close-up of MU!Stamets opening his eyes, saying "I did it!," and stumbling out of bed before the camera tracks sideways to hold on a Sickbay monitor showing the Terran Empire logo, center frame. If that's not cincimatic language for "oh shit Stamets is in the wrong body. Dun dun dun." I don't know what is.
The Stamets aboard Discovery expressing concern about the mycelial garden is harder to explain if hes really MU!Stamets, but I did notice he brushed off Tilly informing him of Culber's death by saying "I know" in a dismissive tone. It's hard to believe Prime!Stamets would so casually dismiss his feelings for his partner not thirty seconds after saying goodbye forever (as far as he knows.)
I will rewatch it, but I didn't see any disorientation.
The close up of the logo could be used to indicate that they unknowingly switched, or it could be to center the audience so that we know where MU Stamets is, since we hadn't seen him or his lab before in the MU.
I wouldn't say (without a confirming rewatch) that it was dismissive. If he was "at peace" with it due to the discussion with Culber in the mycelial network, then he might have more pressing issues to deal with (the dying spores, getting home) and would leave personal issues for later, especially having been comatose for a long time.
Actually the MU Stamets woke up on the flagship and said "He did it!". The visualization (showing it fade from PU Stamets in quarters trying to open eyes to MU Stamets on bed opening eyes) made you think they switched places but what they said and how they acted appeared as though no switch occurred.
Agreed.
Yep absolutely agree. Section 31 stuff (which was hinted at) was dropped as well.
Mirror Universe arc seems like them retooling what they had to work with after the Fuller ideas were not working out after the first few episodes. (I would almost make a bet the Klingon makeup led to severe cutting back of Klingon War as well)
I think the fans were the only ones reading in Section 31 hints where there were none. NCC-1031 is arguably because Fuller loves Halloween. Black badges openly declaring who belongs to section 31 doesn't seem like a Section 31 method to me. Etc, etc.
To be fair though, that is a problem with many of the Trek characters from past series.
In After Trek for this week, Frakes was asked how Mirror Riker would be different from PU Riker. He joked that "he would sit differently." I laughed, but it kind of emphasized for me that the TNG characters were all group-think utopians with just minor surface differences. Riker has his sit down move, plays trombone, and likes having sex with lots of other characters.
Picard likes making sanctimonious speeches and drinking tea, and so on.
I think these characterizations are the most surface-level generalizations one can imagine for these characters. They may have been idealistic utopians, but there is much greater depth to them than you are allowing for here. It's a little insulting to these beloved characters.
Even in TOS, before serialization was a glimmer in Trek's eye, the writers put in "character moment" scenes into most episodes. Basically these were seemingly throwaway interactions between two characters which had nothing to do with the plot of the week, but had everything to do with establishing the characters as plausible, well-rounded human beings (well, sapients, being inclusive of Spock). This tradition continued in TNG. DS9 perfected it (think about the "lunch dates" that Garak and Bashir had). Even VOY and ENT had this, although it was often irritating (the perpetual friction between Neelix and Tuvok for example).
That's a lot of what I'm missing in Discovery. And even though the show as a whole has been getting better, it's been getting worse in this respect. Early on Stamets and Tilly were given some legit scenes which were plot-independent and helped establish their characters, but this has completely fallen to the wayside.
I think this is one drawback of the streaming service. Without the minimum required 42 mintues per episode, TNG and DS9 (and maybe even Voyager) would have missed out on the little character moments, often called "Pillar filler" that Michael Pillar created to get short episodes up to the minimum. Often these were little character moments, because they were easiest to film and integrate into the full episode because they didn't have to be critical plot elements. I could use a few more "Pillar filler" moments in Discovery's shorter episodes (or in all its episodes why not).
Not necessarily - Like PU Georgu; PU Lorca could be dead (killed with his crew in the U.S.S. Buran incident.) There isn't allways a 1:1 correspondence of events.
You forgot one of the primary ST: D showrunners: Kristen Boyer - who, as I understand it is a HUGE ST:VOY fan; and has penned a lot of the ST:VOY novels. And if I'm not mistaken she's the one who on set told Jason Isaacs he could ad lib an expletive using 'God' because in GR's Star Trek Universe, religion is passed <--- Which is a clear indication that if she did watch TOS, she didn't pay a lot of attention to it, because not only did Doctor McCoy use a lot of religious exclaimations; they did have a Chapel on the 1701; were holding a Wedding ion said Chapel (in TOS - "Balance of Terror"); and actually had a couple of episodes with straight up religious themes.
So yeah, I still say, there's a lot of ST:VOY influence in ST: D and it's starting to show and have (IMO) a disappointing/somewhat negative effect one the resulting episodes of late.
As for PU Lorca being dead, yeah, there isn't always a 1:1 correspondence, but like Ted Sullivan said on last week's "After Trek", without a body you can't be sure, and the writers don't want to limit future writers in being able to bring someone back if they need to - hence you can't be sure he is dead.
The showrunners clarified that Boyer's objection to Lorca saying "god" was not an overall ban on religious words in Discovery, but instead because Lorca character in particular would not use the word (either because of his character in general, or because of his MU origin status we don't know).
It appears to me that actually the Terran Empire keeps the existence of the Discovery and the Mirror Universe a tightly held secret - thus Georgiou immediately killing of all those that witnessed evidence of its existence.
It actually doesn't make any sense that the Shenzhou or Rebels even had files at all on the Discovery.
The ISS Discovery, as far as we know, isn't itself classified. Some of its work may be (provided it has a spore drive), but it doesn't seem to have anything directly to do with working on or knowing of the ability to cross over into parallel universes. Also, since the "rebels" are made up of former members (at least the Vulcans or half-Vulcans seem like they can be full citizens of the Empire given Spock's status on the ISS Enterprise) or slaves of the Empire, it is reasonable some of them had access to ships/personnel files when they rebelled. Maybe even someone like MU Lorca.
Lorca is not a scientist, he's a captain. It would be way, way easier if he had some sort of "briefing" by Stamets in how this all worked than if he had to figure it all out himself while also being busy impersonating his prime self. He certainly should have known MU Stamets as well - considering he used to be close to the emperor, and Stamets may have worked on her ship for quite awhile.
Yeah, but we don't know when Stamets (either MU or Prime) started work on the Spore drive/spores/Discovery. Based on episode 3, the Discovery is brand new when PU Burnham arrives on it, so it could all have been spun up after the start of the Klingon War, and if so, then so too could MU Stamets work have really started after the war (i.e., gone from academic thought puzzles to real world). And we know that the Buran happened early on in the war (I forget the exact timing). So MU Lorca might have transitioned over to the Prime Universe before MU Stamets and the spore tech was even a thing - plus Stamets isn't on the ISS Discovery, so they are even more separate in the MU.