148 pages is a non-starter for a feature or a two-hour pilot. The first thing any producer will do is tell you to get it down to under 120. The feature I rewrote I brought down from close to 150 pages (the draft before I took over) down to 117, and the producers now want it down to like 100.
Hour-long TV episode scripts should be between 53 and 62 pages, with the former being the target length for networks with commericals (AMC) and the latter streaming (Netflix). The pilot I've just written is 53 because I want to maximize my potential channels for a sale, and it's easier to add material than cut it.
Valenti, you've basically made it impossible for me to read your work because you're voiced so much concern about people lifting your ideas that if I am working on anything which is even remotely similar to one or more elements in your idea I'm basically inviting an accusation. TNG did a story very similar to something I pitched to the show, and I accept that it was simply a coincidence. Given your posts here I'm unconvinced you'd cut me the same slack.
Personalites again are more important than ideas. This is what killed Star Trek and Star Wars soon enough. Makes no sense to me. If someone says they have a replacement for Star Trek I would want to read it. If you can resist that that than you're exclusionary and arrogant and I don't want to have anything to do with you either.
You guys are hung up on a number. It's an initial rough draft, not the polished script. I'm going to do narrative drafts to resolve issues with the plot, characters and dialog, then I'll do budget drafts to reduce the budget by minimizing the number of sets and visual and special effects shots. My plan was always to get a script done first, regardless of page count, then polish it and tighten it up repeatedly after some feedback from people in my writers group and others. That's why I'm waiting to do further drafts before giving it to @Valenti.148 pages is a non-starter for a feature or a two-hour pilot. The first thing any producer will do is tell you to get it down to under 120. The feature I rewrote I brought down from close to 150 pages (the draft before I took over) down to 117, and the producers now want it down to like 100.
Perhaps, but sci-fi shows have a long history of two-hour pilots, especially Star Trek. TNG, DS9, Voyager, Enterprise and even Discovery all had one. It may be frowned upon in general, but for this type of show, it's kind of a tradition. Now the caveat here is that these are two parters, so if I want to do something like this, I may want to find a good place in the script to divide it into two parts. This might actually work in my favor, though, as it would allow me to split post production into two parts.With extremely rare exceptions, they do not do two hour movie pilots anymore.
It's good to have solid themes and concepts to base your show upon, but at the end of the day, if the show doesn't have anyone you care about, nobody's going to watch it. Look at the most successful sci-fi shows and you'll see an ensemble cast with well-developed characters beloved by the show's fans.Personalites again are more important than ideas. This is what killed Star Trek and Star Wars soon enough. Makes no sense to me.
We`re not, you don`t seem to understand you`re WAY off length.You guys are hung up on a number
It's an unedited rough draft. Of course it's too long. You see an argument where none exists. What is it you think you're telling me that I don't already know? How to subtract? This is exactly what I was talking about then I said that you were "hung up on a number". I'd have never even mentioned the page count if I knew you were going to harp on it like this.That you're close to 50 pages over that means it's much too long and needs to be cut down radically.
Sorry, but you can`t argue this...
You're confusing me with Valenti...And, honestly, I've yet to meet anyone whose self-proclaimed "paradigm shift"ing idea was anything of the sort. Hyping your work in such a manner during in a pitch meeting might work, but when trying to get people interested in reading your stuff it mostly just sounds arrogant. Well, to me, anyway.
Suffice to say that my idea/concept is the ultimate expression of it and since it is unique unto itself, it has never been done or postulated so as to be derivated from.
As per this post, the statements you've made here previously re your concerns about having ideas taken, I'm going to have to give it a miss, not least in part because I'm already consulting on two prospective sci-fi TV projects I'm under NDA on, and don't want to risk reading something that might bear a resemblance to one of them.I'll ask you again, Maurice. Would you like to look at my pitch?
No, those were two different paragraphs: one referring to the topic length (your script) and the other to the idea of paradigm shifts (Valenti). Sorry if that was not clear.You're confusing me with Valenti...
Harlan Ellison sued for 'In Time' and won. Am I right? .
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.