• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Wars: The Last Jedi - Grading & Discussion

Grade the movie.


  • Total voters
    290
That's exactly it. TFA reignited that SW-feeling for me in way that TLJ didn't. I'm not even sure I exactly care about what'll happen next. As a few people wrote: What's left for movie 9? Not much.
The fact that fans can't imagine is a good thing, in my opinion. Fans thought they had Episode II all figured out as well and it ended up not coming out to expectations. Regardless of quality of the story, it went differently than expected.

I am not particularly invested in the rest of the story, but I'll be seeing it regardless.
 
In my opinion her character was pointless and took away from the relationship between Finn/Poe and Finn/Rey.

Well, that was the point: to do anything to keep the most natural character union--Finn and Rey--separated with a nonexistent "romance" with the forgettable Rose.

Add to that, I felt her character was the most "Disneified" in the film that I almost would expect animated birds, chipmunks and anthropomorphic brooms or salt shakers to talk to her in the morning an clean her quarters while she's out taking time away from Finn/Poe/Rey.

That kind of character (aside from the clumsily handled casino sequence) sort of breaks the fourth wall, as she acts like a giddy fan, and not someone attached to a military organization. No Star Wars film ever had that kind of "taking you out of the movie" character.
 
That kind of character (aside from the clumsily handled casino sequence) sort of breaks the fourth wall, as she acts like a giddy fan, and not someone attached to a military organization. No Star Wars film ever had that kind of "taking you out of the movie" character.
Respectfully, I would say that Jar-Jar did that for me more than anything else in the SW films.
 
XCV330 said:
And he took on a dark-jedi or whatever the hell Kylo is and survived. Even Luke didn't manage that (twice)

Luke didn't manage taking on a dark Jedi equivalent and surviving?

When they're in hyperspace about to board the Supremacy, someone says they've managed to cloak the stolen ship.

I suppose we're to assume "no ship that small has a cloaking device" has been thrown out? That there have been technological advancements in this area?
 
Last edited:
And Luke? Still don't quite know why he died at that moment. Would have liked some physical consequences for that force projection, like draining him etc. But the way I see it, he just decided he was at peace and passed.

From earlier in the film:

KYLO: "You're not doing this. The effort would kill you."

Claudia said:
Hm, but when Luke exited the shaft and hung on to that pole, the lightsaber (and his hand) flew by beside him.

I don't think that's what that was.

mos6507 said:
This was one thing I think was missing from Rogue One, for instance. There are no true force-sensitives in it (oustide of the Darth Vader scene at the end)

Chirrut was Force-sensitive. He sensed Jyn's kyber crystal, talked about the Force moving darkly when Cassian was planning to kill Galen, shot down a TIE fighter...
 
Last edited:
I don't know if I already ranked the films or not, but here we go:
RotS/TLJ
AotC/TESB
TPM
RotJ
ANH
TFA

I'm not ranking R1 because, for me, it's a separate thing from the Saga films.
 
The Emperor and Vader were brilliant villains. I expect better from Star Wars. Star Wars needs a Hans Gruber level villain. Not a whiny hipster.
They were cartoon characters, spouting nonsense about evil, power and the dark side. Kylo Ren's "please!" when he's asking Rey to join him in TLJ was better than anything any of the other Star Wars villains ever said. It was genuine.
 
That's the true magic of editing. Let's all take a moment to watch the scene as scripted.

Yeah, you can tell from some of the other deleted Han & Leia scenes that they hadn't fully nailed down how the romance dynamic was going to work during shooting. Lucas has always said he's most at home in the editing bay, so it's no surprise that most of his films seem to transform significantly in the edit.
Respectfully, I would say that Jar-Jar did that for me more than anything else in the SW films.
What, more so than Gormaanda? (and yes, believe it or not she's canon!)

The lesson here is that Star Wars isn't meant to be taken all that seriously and there's a lot of people that would do well to just lighten up about the whole thing. ;)
 
Last edited:
This has been an interesting thread. The first time in a long time where I’ve read 52 pages. People are passionate and mostly respectful and that is a great and precious thing. I thought I might (respectfully) weigh in. I’ve loved star wars since I first saw it about 2 years after its release. I was born in 1975.

I like Rogue One for the fan service, but will probably never watch it again. I liked Force Awakens in the cinema, then didn’t like it when I thought about it - the reason being that I knew every single beat in advance. Another Death Star ... yawn ...

There are some well justified nit picks about this movie but all I know is that I sat in the cinema and I didn’t have a fucking clue what was going to happen next. From Leia being spaced on down. That’s more entertaining to me than ticking off some checklist of things I predicted or didn’t predict would happen. These petitions etc strike me as incredibly childish. If you want that, shouldn’t you just get out your old Kenner toys and do it yourself?

As soon as they announced the sequel trilogy, we knew that the events of the OT were going to be rolled back. JJ is a hack, he ruined Trek because he didn’t understand it’s fundamentals, but he did understand the fundamentals of Star Wars - that no one gives a shit about Vong- whatevers coming from another galaxy, or squabbling imperial factions. These films had to be about guys in black and white armour having bigger ships and chasing our plucky band of heroes. What JJ gets wrong, however, is every lead character is a Mary Sue who hasn’t earned their position, from Cadet Kirk becoming a Captain so quick to Rey needing no training; he’s not that interested in world building, and verisimilitude can take a jump out the window as long as something pops on screen. I’ve been a victim of lost (and nu-BSG) and mysteries rarely turn out to be worth the build up or are unanswered in the end anyway.

So, some of these problems were carried over into TLJ. But Luke Skywalker was not one of them. It simply doesn’t make sense to accept that the stuff that happened or we were told about in the Force Awakens wouldn’t affect Luke Skywalker. He’s in hiding, so we know it did. The established trope is that the old hero refuses to help, he’s out of this business etc. In this movie as the Luke and Rey scenes played out, I started to wonder if he actually would really come back with Rey. As I said, in this movie you didn’t know what was going to happen.

So, now we’ve established he’s in hiding, what’s he doing? Is he going to fly in to the rescue and punch the villain out like Superman in Justice League? Yawn. Is he going to receive a message from Leia “it’s been 2 hours, are you ready?” Yawn (but kinda cool TWOK! Yay!). Is he going to stand on a burning bridge “You shall not pass!” quadruple yawn.

No, he’s going to find a Luke Skywalker solution. Like he did in ROTJ, where he put down his lightsaber. As someone has already said, he’s the lightest Jedi there is, Luke’s a good man, and he’s now a wise man, and he used that wisdom to come up with a magnificent ruse that had me cheering in the cinema. It was the ultimate brains over brawn.

Admittedly, people might be a little bit happier if it had played out exactly as it did in the film, but, instead of vanishing, Luke had just looked at the twin suns with a satisfied wry old smile, and we could all be sitting here speculating about “can you imagine what he’s going to be capable of in the next one??!!” But I suspect Luke had to die, to make room for the new characters, probably a business decision, which happens in this business. As to the manner of his “death”, how could it not be him becoming one with the force? Obi-Wan, Yoda, even Anakin. How could you write anything different for Luke fricking Skywalker? Imagine they’d had a bridge fall on him ...

It was my Luke Skywalker on screen. From the OT, not any EU stuff. He was older and more cynical (me and you both, Luke) but he solved the problem and saved the rebellion.

There’s been so much force-inflation since 1983, I suspect some people wouldn’t have been happy with anything other than Luke pulling a star destroyer out of orbit with his mind.

But that crap belongs in video games, it’s empty spectacle, not dramatic truth, and we all know how video games translate to the big screen.

That’s why Luke’s last stand will ultimately be remembered as a great moment in Star Wars.

Why is Wrath of Khan the best Star Trek film? Because stuff happened in it. Stuff that would reverberate for 2 more films/the rest of the series.

I think they’ve written themselves into a wonderful corner and am looking forward to seeing what comes next.
 
I don't think you know how old Adam Driver and Daisy Ridley actually are currently, nor do I think you know how old Natalie Portman, Jake Lloyd, and Hayden Christensen were during the filming of the Prequels.

Adam, as of this moment, is 34, and Daisy, as of this moment, is 25; that's a 9-year age difference for characters that are 10 years apart (when TFA was being filmed, Daisy was 22 and Adam was 31).

With Padme and Anakin, she was 14 in TPM, 24 in AotC, and 27 in RotS, while he was 9 in TPM, 19 in AotC, and 22 in RotS, which is an age gap of 5 years, whereas Natalie was 16 during filming of TPM and Jake was 8. During filming of AotC, Natalie was 18 and Hayden was 19, and the two actors were both 22 during filming on RotS.

Okay, thanks for this very informative posting - but you still didn't understand the wording "they look like"... which isn't the same as fact. ;)
 
Okay, I've been a Star Wars fan since the age of 2 or 3. I saw RTOJ in the cinema aged 4 and I had seen ANH and Empire numerous times on Betamax before that.

After seeing TLJ on the opening night, I left the cinema very disappointed and frustrated at this mess Rian Johnson has made. With massive plot holes it ruined both characters from both the OT, ST and wasted the ground work that TFA had set up.

So here are the parts of TLJ I had issue with.
1. The exchange between Poe and Hux, the first cringworthy attempt of humour in this film. Works fine for a comedy but wasn't needed.
2. Luke chucking his lightsaber over his shoulder, WTF! An attempt at a cheap laugh and it completely ruins the ending of TFA for me. They could have at least have had Luke acknowledge it then throw it back in Ray's face, this would have had the same affect without looking silly.
3. Leia flying through space like Mary Poppins, I can't describe how much I hate this part.
4. The Maz Kanata scene, ridiculous and looked more like a video game! What a waste of what could have been a great character, sadly not the last time this happens in TLJ.
5. I didn't enjoy the plot with Finn and Rose on Canto Bight, it was pointless, weak, didn't make the most of the characters and wasted the potential of DJ. Seemed like Rian Johnson was just filling time.
6. The death of Snoke, I didn't mind that so much but there were no answers to who he was and because of this it didn't really have any impact on me.
7. Wasted the use of Phasma again, even more so than in TFA.
8. BB8 controlling an AT-ST, reminded me of George Lucas going overboard in the Prequels.
9. Luke's death pissed me off, I would have like to have seen him survive the new trilogy. Do we really have to kill off all the Legacy characters in order for the new characters to thrive?

When TFA came out I felt like a kid again, it felt like the Star Wars I grew up with. Yes it wasn't perfect and it was basically a reboot of ANH but I didn't care. I loved it, went to see it twice at the cinema, bought the Blu-Ray the day it came out and have watched it numerous times. I understand the criticism that JJ Abrams took for playing it safe but with TLJ it feels like Rian Johnson has done the opposite to the extreme, going out of his way to plot twist and shock to the detriment of the story and this didn't feel like Star Wars for me to the point that I wouldn't be bothered if I didn't watch this again. I will of course buy the Blu-ray when it comes out but I won't be rushing to buy it.

The only saving grace for me was that the actors were exceptional, especially Mark Hamill and I really hope he makes some kind of return in Episode 9. But to be honest, I think Rian Johnson has ruined so many great characters both Legacy and new trilogy that I don't hold out much hope for Episode 9.

I'm now praying for the film I didn't really want, Han Solo. I hope this delivers as this is the biggest risk Disney is taking with Star Wars!
 
Last edited:
The thing about Rose is that she's an in-universe fangirl. That's how she introduces herself, starstruck, almost asking for an autograph. So for fans to hate her is to hate having their own archetype represented in-universe. Talk about a lack of self-reflection. The film is, if nothing else, incredibly self-reflexive.

I hadn't really thought about it that way, but there's a point there. I wonder if that was the intent--to put a Star Wars fan in the movie. I'll admit that while Rose didn't piss me off like she did others, I didn't like that romance out of nowhere at the end. Just because a man and woman have an adventure together means they HAVE to make out? And Rose kind of almost killed the rebellion for that. Had Luke not put in a Skype call, the rebellion was toast, because Rose stopped Finn from sacrificing himself for the rebellion.
 
I agree it was vastly more interesting, but at the same time, you can't fault the fans for not liking it. Nobody likes having their favorite character deconstructed that way. We want our heroes and legends! Imagine if a Trek movie "deconstructed" Kirk and showed us a character who was never really the hero we thought he was or imagine a DC movie that "deconstructed" Superman and gave us a character unworthy of adulation. I doubt those fans would be too happy either.

Kirk was deconstructed significantly, and it just happened to be in the most popular and effective Trek film.
 
Kirk was deconstructed significantly, and it just happened to be in the most popular and effective Trek film.

I assume you are talking about Wrath of Khan. I am not sure Kirk was really deconstructed in that movie. Yes, he was older and felt like he was past his prime but the movie did not fundamentally change the character. He still believed in the Federation. He still believed in his crew. And he was still the hero. To draw a parallel with TLJ, Kirk never said something like, "It's time for the Federation to end."
 
Kirk was deconstructed significantly, and it just happened to be in the most popular and effective Trek film.
Kirk was deconstructed significantly but not once did he stop being the hero we grew up with.
A more fitting analogy would have been a Superman where he didn’t try to save people (like his own father) or even started killing his foes. :whistle:
 
I finally saw this movie (late only because of the restrictions of having small children during the holidays) and loved it. I was aware of the controversy going in, but had fought successfully to remain 100% spoiler free. I left the theater with wife and friends saying "what are the fanboys so pissed about?"

I'm not a huge SW fan. I like it, no doubt. But I don't read EU books about how Kit Fisto became a Jedi or what Jek Porkins back story is and all that shit.

I loved how it seemed like the primary goal of the film was to be unpredictable and to jettison old tropes or upend certain fan expectations. To me, that's always gold. I mean hell, there wasn't a single "true" lightsaber duel even! I hate watching the same stuff over and over. It was a wild, unpredictable ride as a result. It certainly wasn't perfect, but I don't judge Star Wars movies that way. I judge them for the fun of the ride.

This one delivered.

It's fun watching people lose their minds...so that's an added bonus.
 
I assume you are talking about Wrath of Khan. I am not sure Kirk was really deconstructed in that movie. Yes, he was older and felt like he was past his prime but the movie did not fundamentally change the character. He still believed in the Federation. He still believed in his crew. And he was still the hero. To draw a parallel with TLJ, Kirk never said something like, "It's time for the Federation to end."

Well, certainly not that extremely, but a big part of Kirk's character was his bravado, confidence, and youthful exuberance.

In TWOK, his flaws lead to a lot of deaths, including Spock's. He's unsure of himself. His actions in the past finally catch up to him in a very unflattering way (Khan, David, accepting a desk job). His discussion with David is also very in-Kirk like. So, his character was definitely "challenged significantly" if not "deconstructed" in the way you've defined it.

It was a bold move that worked (fortunately!).

I kind of felt the same about Luke. I felt like I was watching a real human being instead of a hero template. It WAS a bit of a bummer, but the way I view things, that's actually part of the fun.
 
What, more so than Gormaanda? (and yes, believe it or not she's canon!)

The lesson here is that Star Wars isn't meant to be taken all that seriously and there's a lot of people that would do well to just lighten up about the whole thing. ;)
But, it's Harvey Korman so...nope, you're right :D

Also, I agree. This franchise gets taken way to seriously ("raped my childhood!" and all that).
Okay, thanks for this very informative posting - but you still didn't understand the wording "they look like"... which isn't the same as fact. ;)
I use to think so, but looking back now, it isn't as stark to my eyes:

zEchMGu.jpg

In TWOK, his flaws lead to a lot of deaths, including Spock's. He's unsure of himself. His actions in the past finally catch up to him in a very unflattering way (Khan, David, accepting a desk job). His discussion with David is also very in-Kirk like. So, his character was definitely "challenged significantly" if not "deconstructed" in the way you've defined it.
Which is why I like Abrams' Trek so blasted much.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top