• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 1x08 - "Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    266
And still Tilly is so not worthy of the subject matter. I'm dreading her faux Captain role in the mirror universe. It will be a jump the shark moment.
Why would that be a "jump the shark moment"? It's not the Tilly from the universe we know being a Captain. Wiseman could very well play the character completely different and the writers could write her different as well. That's kind of the point of the Mirror Universe.
 
Why would that be a "jump the shark moment"? It's not the Tilly from the universe we know being a Captain. Wiseman could very well play the character completely different and the writers could write her different as well. That's kind of the point of the Mirror Universe.

That's very true...and it sort of gets to my disquiet with the whole idea of the Mirror Universe, in general. I mean, think about it. People acting completely out of character and yet, somehow, they end up in similar positions, on the same ship, as they would have in the Prime Universe (or starbase, or whatever...). Historically speaking, it makes no sense. Small changes would've created vast ripples and, pretty soon, the idea of familiar history would've been butterflied away almost completely as the 2nd and 3rd order effects expanded at a logarithmic rate. From the first, botched First Contact to Kirk's era there would've been so many changes, it's stretching credulity that any of our familiar characters would've even been born, much less end up in positions similar to those from the Prime timeline.

Yes, yes, I know, it's a particular conceit of the Star Trek series, but it really requires far too much a suspension of disbelief for me to enjoy it.

And the idea of Captain Sylvia Tilly is too much to bear.
 
And the idea of Captain Sylvia Tilly is too much to bear.
Why would Captain Tilly be exactly the same as the 20-21 year old Cadet Tilly? I think if we see Captain Tilly it will be in the future and not in any form of 2256. I don't think they're gonna go with a 21 year old Captain People change and grow. Was the 21 year old you the same as the 30-something you? Like Mirror universes, time jump episodes are often use to show a different take on a character.
 
Why would Captain Tilly be exactly the same as the 20-21 year old Cadet Tilly? I think if we see Captain Tilly it will be in the future and not in any form of 2256. I don't think they're gonna go with a 21 year old Captain People change and grow. Was the 21 year old you the same as the 30-something you? Like Mirror universes, time jump episodes are often use to show a different take on a character.

You are presupposing a time jump when, so far as we know, we're only being treated to a Mirror Universe duology.

Sure, we change. However, the contours of one's personality is more or less fixed by the time one hits one's late twenties. Tilly has a bit to go before she matures so it is certainly possible that she'll grow, mature, and become a more appealing character. In fact, I'd say that's a probable outcome. It's just that, for now, she is completely, wholly unappealing to me.

I suppose it is possible that she'll learn life's hard lessons and that'll take some of the silliness out of her, without totally stripping away her cheery demeanour. If so, so much the better. I have had commanders who've had great senses of humour. I have, however, never had a vapid one. Right now, that is Tilly, in my estimation. A walking cluster of Millennial clichés, much as Wesley was for my generation. And so, in part, my opinion is based on what I think is an attempt at pandering by the writing staff; somewhat in poor taste, methinks (as was Wesley, lest anyone think I'm simply picking on Tilly).

Perhaps my opinion will change later. I am open to that. After all, Stamets is now my second-favourite Discovery character. After Context Is For Kings, Tilly actually beat him, in my estimation. So...we'll see. For now though, I cringe at the possibilities...
 
Lets make this a true story then....
Vulcan exist, and burnham was raised by vulcans from childhood, with all that strict vulcan training. She is now an adult, would i expect burnham to behave more like a vulcan than a human? Yes! Yes i would...
Actually, she was raised by a Vulcan and his human wife, and then after having spent a considerable amount of her childhood among humans. Most of your "expectations" in this case are the lack of Vulcan stereotypes in Burnham's characterization, which doesn't really say anything about her or about you except that people are almost always more complicated than you expect them to be.

On the other hand, Burnham's personality when she first came aboard the Shenzhou is fairly close to the "more like a Vulcan" concept you're going with. She's definitely evolved a lot since then, but her tendency to suppress her emotions and do the purely necessary thing is VERY evident all through Discovery and it's one of the things that I really REALLY like about Burnham so far. There are a few moments where she is visibly and justifiably freaking out (e.g. Mudd jumping out of the space whale and killing everyone) but still manages to keep her cool long enough to do what she has to do.
 
You are presupposing a time jump when, so far as we know, we're only being treated to a Mirror Universe duology.
Yes it's a guess on my part. I think Stamets, because of the tarigrade DNA experiences things non-linearly. Past, present and future become a jumble. That's why he was immune to the time loop. The writers have set up a time jump episode, IMO.

I have had commanders who've had great senses of humour. I have, however, never had a vapid one. Right now, that is Tilly, in my estimation. A walking cluster of Millennial clichés, much as Wesley was for my generation. And so, in part, my opinion is based on what I think is an attempt at pandering by the writing staff; somewhat in poor taste, methinks (as was Wesley, lest anyone think I'm simply picking on Tilly).
I don't see Tilly as vapid. None of the Millennials I know act like Tilly, so I'm not sure which "cliches" might in play there. Likewise I'm not sure what generational cliches were in play with Wes either. I was in my late twenties when TNG debuted, so I guess Wes isn't my "generation". Tilly's type is "multi-generation" in my experience, I've run across Tillys all my life. (Wesleys, not so much), so I don't see the pandering.
 
Yes it's a guess on my part. I think Stamets, because of the tarigrade DNA experiences things non-linearly. Past, present and future become a jumble. That's why he was immune to the time loop. The writers have set up a time jump episode, IMO.

That would be very, very interesting, methinks, and a nice switch-up.

I don't see Tilly as vapid. None of the Millennials I know act like Tilly, so I'm not sure which "cliches" might in play there. Likewise I'm not sure what generational cliches were in play with Wes either. I was in my late twenties when TNG debuted, so I guess Wes isn't my "generation". Tilly's type is "multi-generation" in my experience, I've run across Tillys all my life. (Wesleys, not so much), so I don't see the pandering.

Well, that's why I used the term "clichés." They're not necessarily wholly representative and yet, from a certain point of view, could be seen as being somewhat representative of some facets of the demographic. I was 17 when TNG came out. It reeked, to me, of a certain clichéd stereotype of Gen-Xers (the smart kid who deals with adversity (father dying) by plugging away at academics and becoming the Uber-Brainiac). It descended into parody after a while and, personally, I was just happy when he was written out. If they weren’t going to send him through a normal life’s experience—just let him finish the Academy and get on with life, for cryin’ out loud!—then better to get rid of him.

Oh, I’ve met Millennials like Tilly. I’ve grown children who sometimes act like she does! I’ve Generation-Z children that act more mature than their elder siblings! :lol:
 
I think the cliche that was Wes transcends generations and was not exclusive to Gen-Xers. IIRC, Wes was an idealized version Roddenberry, who was definitely not a Gen-Xer. I think we project a lot into some characters that the writers did not intend.
 
I don't get the hate for Tilly at all. The "fucking cool" thing came out of nowhere and seemed gratuitously out of character, but that's because it wasn't really written as an in-character moment. It was nothing but a light tap on the fourth wall with no point other than: "Hey, did you people out there realize that we can use profanity since this is not broadcast TV?" (Not that I have any problem with profanity, if it feels natural, which this didn't.) And it wasn't only Tilly; the whole exchange felt painfully awkward and shoehorned in. As far as what really counts goes, I've liked her character. That scene in the mess hall where she was bargaining with Burnham and the computer over what to have for breakfast was quite endearing to me, as have been others.

But I guess nobody likes every character, and that's why they make it an ensemble cast, so there's at least someone to suit each individual's taste. I don't particularly like Saru or Stamets, personally, although that is not to say I entirely dislike them, or haven't found anything about them dramatically compelling, because I have. My least favorite as yet is actually Tyler, and I hope the rumors/theories about him are in some fashion true, so his character can get a bit of a reboot. As he is now, he's not working for me even a little bit. Seems bland and superficial in his performance...which, again, I hope has been pointedly intentional up to now. Looking forward to tonight!

My favorite character is, of course, Michael. Wonderful concept and performance thus far, IMO.

-MMoM:D
 
Last edited:
At first I couldn't stand Tilly when she was introduced in ep 3, but she's gown on me during the course of the season, as she has with others here, I've noticed. It's okay for her to be upbeat about things, as only a young cadet can be, so long as it isn't corrupted by naïveté. She was skirting the line early on but I think it's working for her now.
 
I don't get the hate for Tilly at all. The "fucking cool" thing came out of nowhere and seemed gratuitously out of character, but that's because it wasn't really written as an in-character moment. It was nothing but a light tap on the fourth wall with no point other than: "Hey, did you people out there realize that we can use profanity since this is not broadcast TV?" (Not that I have any problem with profanity, if it feels natural, which this didn't.) And it wasn't only Tilly; the whole exchange felt painfully awkward and shoehorned in. As far as what really counts goes, I've liked her character. That scene in the mess hall where she was bargaining with Burnham and the computer over what to have for breakfast was quite endearing to me, as have been others.

But I guess nobody likes every character, and that's why they make it an ensemble cast, so there's at least someone to suit each individual's taste. I don't particularly like Saru or Stamets, personally, although that is not to say I entirely dislike them, or haven't found anything about them dramatically compelling, because I have. My least favorite as yet is actually Tyler, and I hope the rumors/theories about him are in some fashion true, so his character can get a bit of a reboot. As he is now, he's not working for me even a little bit. Seems bland and superficial in his performance...which, again, I hope has been pointedly intentional up to now. Looking forward to tonight!

My favorite character is, of course, Michael. Wonderful concept and performance thus far, IMO.

-MMoM:D

Oh, I wouldn’t say I “hate” Tilly. She’s simply unappealing. That is all. It's certainly not the language. God knows, we swore enough in the service that, if anything, I find the lack of profanity to be unrealistic of my military experience!

I do know some Trekkers who absolutely despise her but, to be honest, I don’t think there’s enough there to despise without slipping into assumption-territory and inferences which may or may not be true. When I say she’s “unappealing,” she is literally that: nothing appeals to me about her characterization, which I find too close to Wesley (a character I simply found cringeworthy and a really big missed opportunity in terms of showing how a character could evolve over time into something more mature and deep. I would’ve loved to’ve seen a character arc that involved him going to the Academy, graduating, and getting his first assignment). My opinion of Tilly may or may not change and I’m open to that possibility. Just isn’t there now.

To be honest, I find the cast of Discovery to be a mixed bag. I came into the show thinking I’d sympathise with Burnham, would find a nice Spock/Data analogue with Saru, and would find a throwback to Kirk’s style of command in Lorca. Not one of those predictions occurred.

I think Burnham is fatally flawed and I have absolutely no sympathy for her. I think the writers made a horrible, characterologically fatal decision in making her a mutineer. No character arc is likely to convince me she’s not better off rotting in prison, short of a temporal reboot (and that would be a cop-out).

Saru is…boring. And, as I’ve said elsewhere, problematic. I’m not certain they thought out very well how a society like the Kelpians could’ve evolved. It reads like a good idea on paper; on execution…less-so.

Lorca, so far, comes close to my original estimation and is, indeed, my favoured character thus far. But that is tempered by the sneaky suspicion that the writers are setting him up for a fall. That would be a shame, in part because it would do away with the only three-dimensional character I’ve seen thus far in the series.

Stamets has grown on me, a lot more than I expected. But, even so, I still find it odd that we do not have a “proper engineer” on the ship. I get that it’s an experimental vessel, but…

Ash, like Lorca, seems more “real” to me, perhaps because of my military background. Nonetheless, I figure the Ash=Voq theory will turn out to be fact, however implausible or unrealistic it seems right now (unless they go the Manchurian Candidate route…) and I’m not looking to invest too much more in him.

Who else is there? The others are ciphers and very undeveloped. It’s early-days, I suppose, but when I think of Discovery, I get a very vague impression, like I’m viewing a scene through fog. Not a whole lot of detail for many of them. It could be that it’s because they’re attempting a serial-like method of storytelling and that will, of necessity, leave some characters underdeveloped. Very well. I just hope it doesn’t feel like this half-way through the second season!
 
Tilly is my favorite character for one reason and one reason alone - she is the only character which feels like she's being given natural development as a human being. Burnham, Stamets, Lorca, Tyler, and Saru are getting development, but the development basically exists only to further the plot (whether the plot of the week or the overall plot arc) forward.
 
Lorca, Stamets and Saru are my three favorite characters thus far and Tilly comes in fourth. I like Sonequa Martin-Green a lot and she's doing the best she can with the material the writers have been giving her, but in all honesty Michael Burnham has mostly been a disappointing character with flashes of great potential and an undeniably intriguing backstory. The writers are not doing Sonequa justice and her character needs to get a lot better and more focused and soon if she's going to remain interesting to watch into Season 2.
 
At first I couldn't stand Tilly when she was introduced in ep 3, but she's gown on me during the course of the season, as she has with others here, I've noticed. It's okay for her to be upbeat about things, as only a young cadet can be, so long as it isn't corrupted by naïveté. She was skirting the line early on but I think it's working for her now.

Yeah, I get the vibe they were trying to convey. Young, idealistic, fourth-year in the academy, ready to take on the world... Sure. And I've known enough 2nd Lieutenants and Ensigns to know that it can be pretty pervasive, at times...at least until the first assignment introduces you to the Real Military (TM) and your ideals start to lose their lustre.

She's in a weird position, in my head. At the tail-end of her education and yet placed in a position where she has to act like she's permanent party, on active duty. That must mess with your head, I should think. I guess it depends on where, in her fourth year, she is. If she's literally an exam from graduation, then this isn't as much of a big deal as one might initially surmise. If she's at the beginning, though... We simply don't know enough about how Starfleet Academy works to judge. Kirk appears to've gotten a similar "early assignment," as did Saavik. So, it may be more common than not.

As for naïveté, well, there seemed to be a lot of that floating around on the Discovery, until Lorca laid down the law. His dressing down of Stamets comes to mind.
 
Kirk was assigned as a cadet to the Republic as early as 2250, before his stint as a student instructor at the Academy. He and Ben Finney served aboard the Republic not very long after Kirk first entered the Academy and it may well have been his very first assignment aboard a Federation starship.
 
Kirk was assigned as a cadet to the Republic as early as 2250, before his stint as a student instructor at the Academy. He and Ben Finney served aboard the Republic not very long after Kirk first entered the Academy and it may well have been his very first assignment aboard a Federation starship.

Right, but I'd like to know how common that actually was. Seems like a very strange way to educate an officer corps. When does one have time to get your education done? Unless, that is, they have flexible cohorts or, now that we know there are holograms during the era, I suppose distance learning isn't out of the question, at least for the academic portion of it.
 
Kirk was assigned as a cadet to the Republic as early as 2250, before his stint as a student instructor at the Academy. He and Ben Finney served aboard the Republic not very long after Kirk first entered the Academy and it may well have been his very first assignment aboard a Federation starship.
Going by what's said in the actual episode, "Court Martial" (TOS), that is simply not true:

STONE: Let us begin with your relationship with Commander Finney. You knew him for a long time, didn't you?
KIRK: Yes, he was an instructor at the Academy when I was a midshipman, but that didn't stand in the way of our beginning a close friendship. His daughter Jamie, who was here last night, was named after me.
STONE: It's common knowledge that something happened to your friendship.
KIRK: It's no secret. We were assigned to the same ship some years later. I relieved him on watch once, and found a circuit open to the atomic matter piles that should've been closed. Another five minutes, it could have blown up the ship.
COMPUTER: Ship's nomenclature. Specify.
KIRK: United Star Ship Republic, number 1371.
STONE: Continue.
KIRK: I closed the switch, and logged the incident. He drew a reprimand, and was sent to the bottom of the promotion list.
STONE: And he blamed you for that?
KIRK: Yes. He had been at the Academy for an unusually long time as an instructor. As a result, he was late in being assigned to a starship. The delay, he felt, looked bad on his record. My action, he believed, made things worse.

[...]

SHAW: With reference to Records Officer Finney, was there in his service record a reported disciplinary action for failure to close a circuit?
ENSIGN: Yes, ma'am.
SHAW: Was the charge in that instance based upon a log entry by the officer who relieved him?
ENSIGN: Yes, ma'am.
SHAW: And who was that officer?
ENSIGN: Ensign James T. Kirk.

He wasn't a cadet, he was an ensign, and it was some years later. The Okudas made a mistake, there. Meant to get back to all that, hopefully will soon.
 
Really liked this episode. It wasn't perfect, but good.

The good:
1) Rectified my beef from last week about forgetting the admiral. Combined with the stardate kerfluffle, it leads me to believe that this episode was originally supposed to air after ep 6 & last week's got switched in somehow.

2) Good stuff planetside. Thought Saru had been taken over at first, but I liked that twist. Much better for the character to do it the way they did it. Now he has to deal with it.

3) Loved the L'Rell/Admiral stuff. Sad that a bit got cut. I mean, an advantage of it being on sream should be less pressure to cut. Have a feeling they thought the cuts added more mystery. For me, if the Admiral is dead, L'Rell doesn't rush to take control of the body.

The not as good:
1) Episode felt a tad rushed, more like the 2 pilot episodes.

2) I have no issue with 'needs of the many' being used again. As stated, it is not exclusive to the final WOK scene. Plus, it is a Vulcan axiom. Plus, that was a LONG time ago, some viewers are unaware.

I gave it an 8.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top