I don't care about what some Star Trek revisionists say (e.g. TNG was a "wrong view of the future", which is complete nonsense, or Gene Roddenberry was a drunkard, etc.), I respect the man (The Great Bird of the Galaxy) and his "vision". Gene wasn't a saint, and his vision of the future wasn't an exact prediction. But it's a nice view of the future (in many ways a socialist-like future, which is probably the reason why it now seems to be disliked and rejected by some since we all currently live in a hardcore capitalist society), positive and optimistic, with morality tales that are supposed to make us question things about ourselves (TOS, TNG et al). Roddenberry wanted to show what humanity had the potential and capacity to develop into, not what it is. This series seems to be an antithesis to all of those precepts. It shows rather the negative aspects of humanity instead of accentuating the positive ones and depicting values worth aspiring to. It's a failure in many ways. Sorry, I'm afraid I don't have much positive to say about STD (the show itself doesn't seem to want to be positive, but rather negative). I have to agree with the OP, this series completely veers off course, totally disregarding Roddenberry's ethos.