• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 1x08 - "Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    266
This is a saying that Vulcans believe in and thus are wont to repeat at times they think it's appropriate. We've seen Spock, T'Pol, and now (semi Vulcan) Burnham, use the expression when the situation involves sacrifice.

The problem with this hypothesis is that Burham didn't say the line entirely by herself. Ash Tyler said part of it as well, which made it seem like it was some in-universe ad lib which just happened to correspond with what we know Spock is going to say in STII.
 
I can't believe I forgot to mention this during my review, but this whole "Voq is Tyler" theory is officially deader than JFK, because the episode showed us Tyler's all-too-human vital signs.
 
Obviously we know the federation will not lose the war to the Klingons since its a prequel. At least with enterprise we knew the possibility of losing to the Xindi was there because of the time travel involved in the story. It's unfortunate to be presented with a storyline that has such a predictable conclusion.
Let's say we do know which side will prevail. (But do we really? I don't remember offhand it being said anywhere that the UFP definitely never lost a war to the Klingons...was it? And it could be a draw, which you did allow for in "will not lose" I suppose.) Even so, we do not know how they will pull it off, nor do we know who will live and who will die (and who will switch sides) by the time they do. Is that not more dramatically important? When you watch a WWII movie do you feel the story suffers from knowing that the Allies and not the Axis will win?
Makes sense for Cornwell to have taken a shuttle to the negotiation site: the episode where she went there took place right next to the negotiation place to begin with, that is, right where Sarek's runabout stalled. Why she didn't take a shuttle from her own ship is very, very unclear, though.
I interpreted that her cruiser sent her over to Discovery in a shuttle from that ship, then it returned and the cruiser departed, with her intent being to stay aboard and "analyze" Lorca at greater length, until that was derailed. Haven't rewatched that one yet, though. Is there a flaw in that?

Has Kol always had that elaborate face paint and I'm just barely noticing it now?
Yes. Are you sure it's the only thing you haven't fully noticed?

It's nice to see that Burnham and Tyler's little love connection wasn't forgotten about as a casualty of Mudd's crazy time loop shenanigans from last week, and I find it interesting that Tyler recognizes the "needs of the many" but also can't escape the pull of what he calls the "needs of the few". Also, if the writers did truly intend to set up the "Voq is Tyler" thing, they're failing spectacularly, because the only thing this scene does is further cement him as fully human and make it harder and harder for people who buy the "Voq is Tyler" theory to justify and explain said theory
I'm not exactly sure what you mean. I saw nothing in this episode that changed anything on that front, whether it be true or false. Did Ward and Skye's developing romance or his jumping out of an airplane to save Simmons or his passing an unbeatable lie detector test in season one of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. prevent him from turning out to be a HYDRA plant? Nope. (I know I've made this comparison before. I hope I haven't spoiled that surprise for anyone here. It was four years ago, after all.)

The "obvious" Tyler-is-Voq clues—or red herrings, depending on whether the cat in the box turns out to be alive or dead—of this installment were in his scene with Saru in the wigwam. Was the "deception" Saru sensed only in regard to his and Burnham's ploy, or could there be more that he is hiding? Was his baring-his-soul-and-wrestling-with-his-demons bit authentic or was it merely part of the deception? Or both?

What exactly did you see here that counter-indicates him being Voq any further than in previous episodes? And if he is not, and they don't want us to think that he is, why do you think we haven't seen him again since Tyler showed up? He seemed like a pretty significant character. And now we're told by the character with whom he was last seen explicitly plotting a comeback: "Oh him? Yeah, he's definitely gone forever." Cool story, L'Rell.

I'm sorry, but I don't buy this "I wish to defect" claim from L'Rell.
I was sure it was going to be a double bluff at first, i.e. just L'Rell's devious method of getting Cornwell to talk. But by the end she certainly seemed pretty damned sincere in her avowed opposition to Kol, even if she seemed willing to instantly throw Cornwell under the bus when it became untenable. And...did she do that or not? I'm not sure Cornwell is actually dead. I'm also not sure now that L'Rell (and Voq too) won't genuinely switch sides and fight with the Feds against Kol. I think it's all up in the air, and that this is quite by design. I found this strand of the episode as confusing and disorientating (without re-watching yet) as others, but I don't think it's just down to sheer sloppiness. We can make guesses at what's happening, but that's it. We won't know until next week. (Or at least, I'm hoping they won't draw it out over the hiatus! They might though, in which case we'll have a couple months to debate about it some more.) We're intended not to be able to tell what's false from what's true.

Admiral Cornwell's supposed death is more than bit suspicious, but because I don't buy L'Rell's sincerity, I also can't buy into the notion that it was staged, either
Well, exactly. Cat in a box. Is it dead or alive? At this point, it could still be either. If she is sincere, then we've also just received confirmation of how convincing she can make a staged fight look. (Remember her fight with Tyler in "Choose Your Pain"?) If she is not, why exactly did she confide so much in Cornwell only to immediately spook and abort the whole pretense when questioned, and why does she not at least try to explain to Kol that she was merely attempting to do what he and his goons had been unable to do up to that point (make her talk) just as she'd told him she would in the first place?

Why did L'Rell assume that Kol killed her crewmates?
Because he's running this ship (and outfit) now. Who else would have done it, or had it done? And I agree with others who have said that her horror is not merely at their deaths, but additionally at the treatment (or lack thereof) that their bodies have received.

Huh; apparently I was wrong that the creatures did something to change Saru's behavior, and he went a little bit nuts on his own. Interesting twist on the usual storytelling formula typically used for these kinds of stories in Trek
They removed/suppressed the instinctive fear he had lived with constantly since birth. He liked it, and wanted to remain free of it. I agree it was an interesting twist.

The scene in sickbay between Saru and Burnham was really interesting because it gives us a lot of insight into Saru's character and why he behaves the way he does; it also makes me really want to know more about what led him to join Starfleet in the first place
Agreed there as well. I also think @Vger23's comment above about this incident likely leading him and Burnham to have greater empathy for and understanding of each other.

* Mary Chieffo has quickly become my favorite Klingon. Aside from the fact that she's clearly much better at speaking in those prosthetics (her dialogue is much more fluid), I like that she's far more complex than many of the other Klingons. She really does believe in honor. Plus, I can't wait until L'Rell kicks Kol's ass.
L'Rell is without question the most charismatic of the Klingons. With all that make-up somehow Chieff is managing to convey much about the character, not just with her voice and words, but also with her eyes. More her, please.
Indeed. She reminds me of Mara in "The Day Of The Dove" (TOS), and it even seems possible she might end up playing a similar role in the resolution of the conflict here.

And yet Tyler is scanned and treated at sickbay with no issues whatsoever. No 'heartbeat's all wrong, his body temperature is...' The monitor over his bed - human organs, all where they should be and looking correct. (And what little we see of Saru's monitor shows a totally different anatomy, so they weren't just cut-and-pasting.) The blood coming out of his mouth after Saru belts him - human crimson, not Pepto Bismol pink or even semi-violet. So if he is you-know-who, he hasn't simply had his head ridges and teeth filed down; he is literally in a fully human body, to the point scanners can't pick him up.
Who ever suggested it was something so "simply" superficial? L'Rell said he would have to "sacrifice everything." That doesn't sound like merely his ridges and his teeth, to me.

Darvin's tells may have only been triggered by the tribbles' proximity in the first place. They "seem[ed] to have a tranquilizing effect on the human nervous system" according to Spock, and conversely an antagonizing effect on the genetically-altered-with-augmented-human-DNA-Klingon nervous system. Darvin had passed as a human up to that point, and then did so again for the next century per "Trials and Tribble-ations" (DS9). Do you find it plausible that he wasn't scanned in all that time, except that once? Did he never use a transporter? Wouldn't it make more sense that this would have been anticipated and somehow compensated for or circumvented, and the only unforeseen element in play was those troublesome tribbles?

While the particular strain(s) of the Augment virus we saw in "Affliction"/"Divergence" (ENT) did not alter Klingon bio-signs, the story revolved around altering the virus. There the goal was to mitigate its effects, but the spies of House Mókai may have quite different goals, and they've now had more than a hundred years to tinker with the concept further. Who knows what results they've come up with in that time? We've certainly seen other mutagenic viruses that transform the subject completely into another species at the genetic level, with the appropriate internal organs and all. It is not so farfetched as it may seem at first blush. See "Extinction" (ENT) and "Favorite Son" (VGR).

The mind-sifter/ripper that Kor had in "Errand Of Mercy" (TOS) was capable of "record[ing] every thought, every bit of knowledge in a man's mind" and leaving the body an "empty" "mental vegetable" that could be a potential vessel for someone else to inhabit. Not to mention assorted other mind/body-swap techniques seen elsewhere in Trek. This is a long-established thing in the ST universe. The same ST universe where DSC is set.

I can't believe I forgot to mention this during my review, but this whole "Voq is Tyler" theory is officially deader than JFK, because the episode showed us Tyler's all-too-human vital signs.
Dude, I've been expecting to see exactly that all along. It's the most straightforward and obvious way (short of seeing Voq dead, which I still expect we might even see) to allay everyone's suspicions after raising them. Again, mutagenic virus, mind-sifter body swap, or something else that we "never knew possible" as per "The Butcher's Knife..."

To be clear, is your position that not only is he not Voq, but they have never wanted us to think he might be any point? I can buy the former but not the latter.
 
Last edited:
Also, if the writers did truly intend to set up the "Voq is Tyler" thing, they're failing spectacularly, because the only thing this scene does is further cement him as fully human and make it harder and harder for people who buy the "Voq is Tyler" theory to justify and explain said theory

The problem is two fold.

First - a Voq hidden as Tyler - self aware or not - to me, mind you, would feel like one of those crazy reveals from an old soap or perhaps a Scooby-Doo villain unmasking.

Folding it into the concept of the augment virus feels also unnecessarily complex for viewers who never needed to connect the Klingons from 1960 to these. Sure, Enterprise did it, but at the turn of the century ridge brow Klingon were still popping up theaters and Voyager and DSN's Klingons had just left the airwaves.

So Tyler as Voq? Shouldn't happen. But because I'm so certain they won't do it, they most certainly will.
 
Folding it into the concept of the augment virus feels also unnecessarily complex for viewers who never needed to connect the Klingons from 1960 to these.
But they've specifically said they want this show to connect up with TOS. I'm willing to bet that, like just about everything else in the show which has made fans cry foul, they have a plan for how the Klingons as seen here tie together with the ones we see in TOS. And that they won't just leave it for us to head-canon.

Personally, I thought the ENT storyline was unnecessary then. But I think it likelier than not, since it was done, that now they will want to include some sort of through-line from it to TOS in DSC, and that it's been thought out from the time the show was in development.
 
This. :lol:


My guess? By keeping the times the same as broadcast television, they make it possible to run it on their regular channels in the future, with commercials, should they wish to do so and without cutting anything.

Probably not. There's been at least three episodes that were 48-50 minutes long, when standard broadcast shows are now about 42 minutes.
 
Burnham and Tyler are convinced Saru “has been compromised” so she runs off to use the transmitter. If Saru “got compromised” then how do they know they really got permission? Why can’t Saru know about their plan? NONE OF THIS MAKES ANY SENSE!!

Tyler took command of the mission and ordered Burnham to adjust the transmitter.
 
That was also kinda weird. She didn’t know they were dead? Her friends are missing, for days, some of them maybe for weeks. Did L’Rell just figure they went on holiday?

And HOW did the admiral escape? Doesn’t really seem like they’re running a tight ship security wise.

L'Rell left everyone behind on the Sarcophagus Ship when she left with Voq. So she hadn't been back on the ship since Kol took it at the end of that episode. Kol probably killed most/all of the followers of T'Kuvma, and that's the realization she has when she sees the bodies.

The escape was the initial escape in the hallway that they saw.
 
Oh, and let's not forget that Tyler is chief of security. That would likely grant him access to ship's systems to tamper with them to prevent being recognized, if that would indeed be an issue.
 
Last edited:
Probably not. There's been at least three episodes that were 48-50 minutes long, when standard broadcast shows are now about 42 minutes.
Well, that tells you how long I've been out of the broadcast TV loop. 42 minutes? 18 minutes of commercials. Yeesh.
 
If Tyler is Voq, there is no way he would allow discovery to be destroy. He is going to hand it over to the Klingon.
Which Klingons?

Voq is the Torchbearer, who inherited T'Kuvma's people, and then lost them, their space hearse, and cloaking tech, to Kol from the House of Kor, who is continuing to assimilate the extended klingon Empire.

The Klingons fighting the Federation are the enemies of Voq.
 
One thing I didn't realized I missed until I saw it was viewscreen communication, with the Gagarin during the battle.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top