IIRC, the killer issue was that they were willing to omit her from episodes so she could do other projects, but couldn't officially state that, whereas the other producers would only hire her if it was officially guaranteed that she would be free. Impasse.Well given the fact Tracy Scoggins was not in every ep I don't think time off was the issue.
Wow, that must have been something else. One point to add to the 'fog', though. Of the entire cast, Christian was the only one who failed to sign a one-month extension of the option pick-up and that was before any discussion of time off being needed. So she was unemployed already even though she was offered a contract.But there is immense fog over the entire issue... and I say that as someone who was dealing with all the relevant people at Blackpool on the weekend the balloon went up.
We didn't really know anything about it at the time; too busy trying to keep the con and the awards on the rails. In hindsight though it explains moments when Joe and Claudia were suddenly prickly.Wow, that must have been something else.
Maybe he couldn't afford to offer enough. Kickstarter time!He tried for two years a while back to buy the show back and was unsuccessful. WB doesn't seem inclined to do anything with the property but refuses to let anybody else do anything, either.
Warner's is playing the spoilt child. "it's mine and you can't have it even if it's not doing anything and I don't want it"
Maybe. But they also seem to be leaving money on the table deliberately. Word (and mind, this isn't anything I've personally verified) is that during the #FreeBabylon5 campaign, some local stations asked about getting the show for reruns and were told that it wasn't available. It seems that one has to ask the division that made B5 for permission (as Go90 did) rather than the usual WB division-pure politics. Likewise, I've heard from two reputable sources that Big Finish asked about licensing the show to do audio dramas and they were also told that no license was available. So the question is, why would they seemingly want the show to fade from the public consciousness?They might be thinking it'll be worth something at some point in the future given all the remakes/reboots/reimaging/film adaptations of 70's/80's shows we have been getting recently. Give it another 5-10 years and it'll be the 90's stuff doing all that.
That is weird. I know the show isn't quite at the Star Wars or Star Trek level, but I would still think there would be enough fans out there that they could make some money off of it.Maybe. But they also seem to be leaving money on the table deliberately. Word (and mind, this isn't anything I've personally verified) is that during the #FreeBabylon5 campaign, some local stations asked about getting the show for reruns and were told that it wasn't available. It seems that one has to ask the division that made B5 for permission (as Go90 did) rather than the usual WB division-pure politics. Likewise, I've heard from two reputable sources that Big Finish asked about licensing the show to do audio dramas and they were also told that no license was available. So the question is, why would they seemingly want the show to fade from the public consciousness?
"Well, yeah, I did create the series, executive produce it, write 91 out of 110 episodes, and I do control many of the rights. And no deal can go forward without my involvement. By contract, if it doesn't happen with me, it doesn't happen."
"First, WB does not have anything going with B5 at the moment, and would not DO anything with B5 without my direct involvement. (Interestingly enough, I had a meeting just a few days ago with the HEAD of WB Television, and they confirmed that there's nothing in the pipeline, in or out of the studio, and won't be until and unless I authorize it."
You’re assuming it was Warner Brothers decision. Maybe it was jms himself who didn’t want anyone else to play in his universe. He does have a thing about having full creative control. He also appears to have a significant say in what gets produced – and if he isn’t involved, it don’t happen.
Even if JMS does indeed have to be involved for somebody to do something new (and there's no reason to doubt, only to question how much involvement), there's no indication that he has to be consulted in order for WB to refuse point blank.
JMS doesn't have any say at all whether WB licenses reruns which have reportedly been repeatedly declined. Most recent case in point: he found out about Pick TV in the UK picking up the show from a fan. Much earlier, he was also unaware of Mongoose licensing (and then having that license withdrawn) comic books. My source for that is Sprange himself. It was DC comics that put the kibosh on that project.
As for the kerfuffel with Jerry Doyle...well, one shouldn't speak ill of the dead. Suffice to say that his behavior left much to be desired.
Exactly - and where are they getting that from. You/we are only ever hearing one side for the last 20+ years - jms’s side. Warner has never released a comment or statement. I’m not saying jms is lying, but to get a more balanced and accurate view of things – or at least to discuss what’s going on in a more informed manner – you really do need to hear from the others involved rather than just focusing on some aspects of what one side is saying, and ignoring stuff like he can basically veto new material from being made. . . . . I mean, him being able to do that is at least worth mentioning in this kind of conversation.But from what others have said earlier it sounds like WB is not letting JMS do stuff with it either.
Which is their right. Just like it’s jms’s right to say, reveal or imply whatever he wants. I’m not saying Warner HAVE to make comments or give statements. But without them we’re all left with an incomplete picture. So speculation becomes the norm, and almost inevitably that will result in some degree of bias and/or inaccuracy in perceptions – especially if things like this are left out the discussion. I mean, does this sound like a studio who have abandoned their IP (emphasis added by me).I personally tried to get WB to make any kind of statement about allowing B5 in reruns about 25 times during the #FreeBabylon5 campaign. Their side of the story is that they refused to answer in any way, shape or form.
Anyway, they call every so often and want to do something with B5 and asked "Do you want to do a feature film?" and I thought about it for a while and I said, "No." And here's why: A) I don't trust movies that much but B) most important, I can't see the structure of a B5 movie right now as long as long as Andreas and Rick insist on staying dead. As much as B5 was about the stories of Sheridan and Delenn and those guys, there's the Londo and G'Kar arc that was the clothes line from which I hung all that. And without G'Kar.maybe in a year or two I can start to see the structure of it but right now I can't do something big right now. I'd love to but I can't.
WB: "Do you want to do something else? Whatever you want to do, let's do."
You want to do another one for two, maybe five million and I say, "You know what? No." The fans of Babylon 5 have stood with the show for so long and when you have me write stuff with financial handcuffs on, it leads you to having creative handcuffs on. You can't have extras, you can't have fights, you can't have stunts, you can't have a lot of stuff. [unintelligible] You know what? I've got a lot of movies going giving me a certain credibility there...I'm gonna roll the dice. I told Warner's: "Big budget feature film or nothing." I own the movie rights
You keep conflating that JMS said he had to be involved with his having veto power over any new projects and there's no basis for that assumption at all. The only thing we know he had veto power over was the quality of merchandise. For all we know, under most circumstances his involvement would be to collect a check as creator.Are Warner stopping jms from making a movie by withholding the tv rights – and is jms stopping Warner from making new tv, online or audio material by witholding his authorisation. . . . . Again, I dunno, but it’s potentially an interesting question.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.