Oh, you ain't ignoring your way out of the Memory Alpha editing, mate.
We'll know know what they say about people from West Milwaukee.
Oh, you ain't ignoring your way out of the Memory Alpha editing, mate.
Haha so? I was laughing the whole time while I changed it too. People kept bringing up memory alpha's stance on canon as if that carries weight. Memory Alpha's position on the matter is whatever the last person who modified it says it is. It's a Red herring. Defending a questionable canon thing such as the holodeck on discovery with a questionable canon source like the animated series is also counter productive. It's a bait and switch fallacyOh, you ain't ignoring your way out of the Memory Alpha editing, mate.
But the fact that your edites were immediately deleted shows that it does maintain a constant policy and not just the opinion of random editors.Memory Alpha's position on the matter is whatever the last person who modified it says it is.
It was not a random editor who changed it back actually. The original page creator did it. A single person who moderates the changes over the yearsBut the fact that your edites were immediately deleted shows that it does maintain a constant policy and not just the opinion of random editors.
Furthermore we have already demonstrated that the existance of the simulation room in Discovery is not necessarily contradicted by the previously mentioned TNG and VGR episodes even without having to rely on the rec room from TAS.
First of all, if you did this on purpose to make a point about Memory Alpha, then why didn't you... you know, make the point? You had plenty of opportunity to do so over the last 20 or so posts in the thread, but apparently you were happy to leave it unsaid until you were called out on it.Haha so? I was laughing the whole time while I changed it too. People kept bringing up memory alpha's stance on canon as if that carries weight. Memory Alpha's position on the matter is whatever the last person who modified it says it is. It's a Red herring. Defending a questionable canon thing such as the holodeck on discovery with a questionable canon source like the animated series is also counter productive. It's a bait and switch fallacy
Uh, no. The creator of the page was a user listed as Jasonr (now going by MinutiaeMan). Sulfur who deleted your addition only edited the article 18 times out of the nearly 200 edits it received since 2003 and most of these changes seemed to be cosmetic in nature, like link fixes and template changes.It was not a random editor who changed it back actually. The original page creator did it. A single person who moderates the changes over the years
There are no words for tonight's episode? Holodecks are not supposed to exist in this timeline
Writers do not give a shit about canon. Canon be damned!
http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Holodeck
Hello at http://www.startrek.com/sitemap it labels the database as "The Offical Star Trek Canon." which has Star Trek the Animated Series included with it.
This has implications that the animated series is part of canon but I haven't seen any indication that CBS has taken an official position on it (or have they?). Anyway I was wondering if this wording of "The Official Star Trek Canon." can be tweaked so it does not lead to so much confusion about where the animated series stands in the event that CBS has not taken an official position on that.
It's a Red herring.
You should really stop name-dropping "logical fallacies" that you obviously googled for 2 minutes and don't really understand.It's a bait and switch fallacy
"Hello CBS, I haven't seen any indication that CBS has taken an official position on this, so could you please take down this indication that you have taken an official position on this?"I contacted CBS and let them know about it so hopefully they'll fix it
But that is not necessarily the explanation for holo-communication. David Mack's theory was that due to the holo transmissions having taking up too much bandwith and being easier to hack into they were eventually discarded, presumably before TOS. Also due to their instable nature as seen in the previous Discovery episodes they really aren't as pleasant to look at compared to a normal screen to screen communication.Being the generous guy that I am, it's possible that Discovery just has the first holodeck since it is a military ship for the same reasons that the military had the first cell phones and first access to the network that we call the internet today. It's a pretty shakey explanation at best given how the holocommunication devices are common place as well.
So you're asking CBS if the show listed under the official canon section of their licensed website is officially canon? In all seriousness I am looking forward to their reponse.Hello at http://www.startrek.com/sitemap it labels the database as "The Offical Star Trek Canon." which has Star Trek the Animated Series included with it.
This has implications that the animated series is part of canon but I haven't seen any indication that CBS has taken an official position on it (or have they?). Anyway I was wondering if this wording of "The Official Star Trek Canon." can be tweaked so it does not lead to so much confusion about where the animated series stands in the event that CBS has not taken an official position on that.
I had to dig a bit to find the word canon associated with their database. The star trek website was poorly constructed. I'm sure they didn't put much thought into putting that word "canon" in there along with the animated series.But that is not necessarily the explanation for holo-communication. David Mack's theory was that due to the holo transmissions having taking up too much bandwith and being easier to hack into they were eventually discarded, presumably before TOS. Also due to their instable nature as seen in the previous Discovery episodes they really aren't as pleasant to look at compared to a normal screen to screen communication.
So you're asking CBS if the show listed under the official canon section of their licensed website is officially canon? In all seriousness I am looking forward to their reponse.
Edit: Zar beat me to the punch![]()
Perhaps they didn't. I don't think this matter deserved much thought in the first place. Star Trek canon is made up of the series and movies, and TAS is a series.I had to dig a bit to find the word canon associated with their database. The star trek website was poorly constructed. I'm sure they didn't put much thought into putting that word "canon" in there along with the animated series.
As was pointed out previously in this thread information from TAS was incorporated into startrek.com in 2007. CBS has the ultimate control over the page and I doubt that they would allow TAS to be included on the list of official Trek canon if they considered it non-canon.I had to dig a bit to find the word canon associated with their database. The star trek website was poorly constructed. I'm sure they didn't put much thought into putting that word "canon" in there along with the animated series.
I think we've finally found some common ground.The star trek website was poorly constructed.
The exact nature and location of that facility were never specified. Bashir was sleep-deprived, too, and only just realizing that he'd been beamed off the station (or had he?). And at best (for your position), all it would prove is that at least some holodecks—which again, the "Inquisition" facility actually wasn't specifically called by anyone there, though I agree that's what it appears to be—are holosuites, not that all holosuites are holodecks, a conclusion that is separately counter-indicated by the "Take Me Out..." passage.People trying to turn nothing into something again I see. Bashir referred to a holodeck on a ship as a holosuite during episode Inquisition. They mean the same thing
BASHIR: So you beamed me out of my quarters into this holosuite when I was asleep.
SLOAN: I believe we allowed you a full hour.
That's more the spirit!Being the generous guy that I am, it's possible that Discovery just has the first holodeck since it is a military ship for the same reasons that the military had the first cell phones and first access to the network that we call the internet today. It's a pretty shakey explanation at best given how the holocommunication devices are common place as well.
"The Big Goodbye" (TNG) starts off with Troi specifically mentioning that Picard has "been looking forward to the upgrade of the holodeck" and like Riker in "Farpoint" the novelty cited in his comments is about the incredible sensory reality of the simulation. The mere existence and use of such a facility are not portrayed as entirely new or unfamiliar to either. Nor was such intended by Roddenberry, who had come up with the idea by the second season of TOS and planned for it to be built and shown in the third as he relates in the The Making Of Star Trek, originally published between the two:Is it possible that Picard's amazement with the holodeck in series 1 was down to his ignorance of these things? He's a book worm, and the be a fair, a bit of a snob, preferring the genuine article over cheap imitations and naturally shunned the false experiences on offer by these contraptions.
When he finally uses one, he loves it and is immediately converted and becomes an instant holobore, telling all who will listen, and being captain, that's everyone. The rest of the crew is just humouring him.
Here is the Definitely Real response from CBS:In all seriousness I am looking forward to their reponse.
As was pointed out previously in this thread information from TAS was incorporated into startrek.com in 2007. CBS has the ultimate control over the page and I doubt that they would allow TAS to be included on the list of official Trek canon if they considered it non-canon.
In the end it probably comes down to the fact that canon isn't really important to CBS. As a company it is their goal to make money. I'd imagine that the creators are the only ones who really require to know what exactly is canon since they need to know what they are allowed to contradict and what not.
I think we've finally found some common ground.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.