You 're confused.This is a joke, right? The most bland, lifeless Trek is "worth following"?
You 're confused.This is a joke, right? The most bland, lifeless Trek is "worth following"?
Agree with pretty much all of this except the part about the Beebs writing it all themselves. They didn't, but the problem was that they hired writers who, IMO, lacked imagination (except Mike Sussman). But because of the suits and the Beebs, the show had no real direction in the first two seasons which I'm sure affected the writing.My reading of why Enterprise failed is basically that Berman/Braga alienated all of the Trek writers by that point, meaning they had to write the first three seasons all by themselves. At the same time, the studio was heavily interfering in the "creative process" (if you can call it that) mostly for the worse. E.g., the studio was even more risk averse than Bannon/Braga (killing the idea of the first season being set on Earth, for example), which is why we got two more seasons of Voyager with a different cast rather than a real prequel. By the time the show began retooling, fans lost interest.
But I think that what is more important for DSC than internet polls is the amount of overall "interest" in DSC. Because so many of the people who vote that they don't like the show in those polls, are likely still avid watchers. This forum is kind of proof of that. Many of the people who profess to not like the show (and I'm not disputing that they don't), still watch. Call it the "Howard Stern Syndrome".
If true, I just hope this doesn't signal the start of a Marvel-on-Netflix-style series spamming. How many of those series' are actually any good?
Quality over quantity, please.
I think Trek can sustain 2 shows, but probably no more. Trek is still popular, but it's not 1995 popular, so we have to pace ourselves. Especially if they alternate the airing times during the year so that only one is actively being shown at a time.
Hence the "If..."
I think Trek can sustain 2 shows, but probably no more. Trek is still popular, but it's not 1995 popular, so we have to pace ourselves. Especially if they alternate the airing times during the year so that only one is actively being shown at a time.
You 're confused.
Babylon 5 was "Lord of the Rings (in SPAAACE!)" in the first place; and hell, JMS later work "Crudsade" was a real close rippoff (Time fame and some minor issues changed) of the Anime series "Space Battleship Yamato" - hell the Excalubur's main gun had all the power and pitfalls of the Yamato's Wave Motion Gun EXACTLY.I'm fairly sure that Babylon Five was lifted by SOMEONE to create Deep Space Nine as there's ample evidence it was a concept in the hands of people who made the latter after submission by JMS.
This, by contrast, seems more like the kid who insisted they ripped him off to make the animated Tribbles sequel.
Again, why are you bringing ST: YOY into the discussion?This is a joke, right? The most bland, lifeless Trek is "worth following"? The Trek show that was so boring, it was on the verge of cancellation every season because nobody was watching?
I think you're off your meds, to be quite frank. And this is coming from someone who has been watching Enterprise for the past week while he works...
Apart from the first two episodes Discovery has had a much stronger start than Enterprise ever did.Enterprise was a show chasing past success and never catching up.
Discovery is so far, IMO far more entertaining and creative,
Apart from the first two episodes Discovery has had a much stronger start than Enterprise ever did.
While I am no fan of the first two episodes of Discovery they at least had some action in them.
Unfortunately they had Klingons talking...
Somebody alert the irony police...No one here has been posting about Star Trek Enterprise recently except for you.
Oh, but yeah - Discovery is pretty dull so far. Twenty years ago? It might have seemed modern.
Discoverys start pretty much blows Enterprise away even with the unrecognisable Klingon ships and horrible monologue.I have a major in DS9 and a strong minor in TNG,
I believe Disco has a stronger start than ENT, a stronger first 6 episodes than TNG, I still find the start to DS9 more entertaining, but that may just be me being a fan wanker.
Best the staff do what they think is best, some fans are going to complain no matter what they do.
Not really called for. It's pretty clear from the context he means "following the TOS Enterprise", not the TV show, "Enterprise".I think you're off your meds, to be quite frank. And this is coming from someone who has been watching Enterprise for the past week while he works...
Not really called for. It's pretty clear from the context he means "following the TOS Enterprise", not the TV show, "Enterprise".
Can I get an "AMEN!!!"?
Not really called for. It's pretty clear from the context he means "following the TOS Enterprise", not the TV show, "Enterprise".
...stories that were inconsistent with "Gene's Vision..."...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.