Gene's vision, "Can I get this show on the air for more than one season."
You're forgetting "awkward sex" and "trinkets."
Gene's vision, "Can I get this show on the air for more than one season."
Importantly, it was Riker's program, so take his spank bank with a grain of salt.
You're forgetting "awkward sex" and "trinkets."
Yeah, Archer is one of the most bigoted lead characters in the entire franchise at the start of the series. He takes quite a while to warm to T'Pol being a true equal in Enterprise's crew roster and Trip also harbors a lot of resentment for the Vulcans early in the series. A lot of that is understandable and we get more in-depth explanation of the origins of their attitudes in "First Flight," but bigotry is still bigotry no matter how otherwise noble and upstanding a character may be.
IDK about that Sisko seemed to really hate English-Frenchman in the DS9 pilot.Yeah, Archer is one of the most bigoted lead characters in the entire franchise at the start of the series. He takes quite a while to warm to T'Pol being a true equal in Enterprise's crew roster and Trip also harbors a lot of resentment for the Vulcans early in the series. A lot of that is understandable and we get more in-depth explanation of the origins of their attitudes in "First Flight," but bigotry is still bigotry no matter how otherwise noble and upstanding a character may be.
Problem with Archer's grudge is that he was only supposed to have that in the pilot. His whole arc in that episode is learning to get over his rigid outview and embrace T'Pol's help. That's what the ending was all about. But then the next episodes immediately press the reset button and it's more of "you God damn Vulcans" spiel. It would be like if DS9's second episode suddenly had Sisko not having confronted the loss of Jennifer.Yeah, Archer is one of the most bigoted lead characters in the entire franchise at the start of the series. He takes quite a while to warm to T'Pol being a true equal in Enterprise's crew roster and Trip also harbors a lot of resentment for the Vulcans early in the series. A lot of that is understandable and we get more in-depth explanation of the origins of their attitudes in "First Flight," but bigotry is still bigotry no matter how otherwise noble and upstanding a character may be.
Although in real life Archer wouldn't get over his prejudices and negative beliefs about Vulcans in just the space of one mission. He spent practically his entire life being told or otherwise believing that Vulcans kept his father from reaching his goal of seeing a Warp 5 engine fly and that's a good three or four decades of inculcated cynicism and bigotry. It may have been much neater and cleaner for Archer to put his bigotry to rest after the end of the premiere episode but it's more realistic to see him struggle with those feelings in ensuing storylines.
It just feels more believable for him to gradually overcome his preconceived notions rather than have the events of one or two episodes turn him into a paragon of tolerance.
I understand your explanations, but I don't agree. There is simply no way Starfleet was reduced in numbers as far as those who knew tactics and ship to ship combat. Like mentioned above, tactics were required reading at the Academy, and there is simply no way a majority of those in Starfleet are not able or forgot how to fight.
I agree and it's already turning fans away from even watching this iteration of "Star Trek" any further. In the previous Trek series the nature of the characters created a distinct impression that we were watching people from the far future, in this Trek I'm seeing same boring characters that surround us in 2017.
Maybe two different people with, you know, different ideas and experiences and stuff? Like real people?Commander Landry: I see we’re unloading all kinds of garbage today. All right, Starfleet says we have to feed the animals.
Captain Kirk: Well, here's one thing you can be sure of, mister: leave any bigotry in your quarters. There's no room for it on the bridge.
(The difference between Star Trek and Battlestar Trek: The Expanse)
Ben Sisko in “The Pale Moonlight”. Noble people losing their values during wartime. Silent Leges, anyone?I agree. It seems like some of the characters aren't being conceived with much thought. They are Starfleet. We saw better behavior a hundred years prior to this in ENT.
Ben Sisko in “The Pale Moonlight”. Noble people losing their values during wartime. Silent Leges, anyone?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.