• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Scruffy-looking untitled Han Solo film thread

Tuskin38 said:
I'll assume they're just named after the characters and won't actually be like those characters.
Click to expand...
I don't know, having Imperial officers as a comedic double-act could be great, like those two Royal Marines in the Pirates of the Caribbean movies.
 
I think I'm more impressed that Ron Howard even knows enough to make that reference than anything else. I mean you have to be pretty deep into Star Wars fandom to have even heard of Tag & Bink. When it comes to the weird and/or obscure, they're right up there with Jaxxon, the Hoojibs and Trioculus.
 
Last edited:
Reverend said:
I think I'm more impressed that Ron Howard even knows enough to make that reference than anything else. I mean you have to be pretty deep into Star Wars fandom to have even heard of Tag & Bink. When it comes to the weird and/or obscure, they're right up there with Jaxxon, the Hoojibs and Trioculus.
Click to expand...
Oh, man, Trioculus. That was a story.
 
I'm always going to have a soft spot for those stories since they were my first experience with Star Wars outside of the movies. Actually they might have been my second, I can't remember if I saw the Ewok movies, or read the Jedi Prince (Trioculus) stories first.
 
Ugh. I hate stupid subtitles like that. Just call it Solo and trust your audiences to know that it's connected to Star Wars.
 
Tuskin38 said:
I think it fits perfectly.
Click to expand...

Of course it fits perfectly. It's the star of the movie. It's like calling the first Jack Reacher movie.... Jack Reacher. But, it's not particularly GOOD. Or exciting. It doesn't really say what it's about, just who is at the center of it.

What if it was Han Solo at Star's End? (which is a great book.)
Or Kessel Run.
Or Han Solo's Great Big Wookie Adventure.

This title feels like it was chosen by committee trying not to do anything to risky.


fireproof78 said:
Let us judge the film by its content not its title.
Click to expand...

I don't know about you, but, I'm judging the title.
 
Tuskin38 said:
Not at all, it says exactly what it is, a film about Han Solo.

Marketing.
Click to expand...


Do you really think that a Han Solo movie was going to be a hard sell? Do you imagine the following scene taking place anywhere in the world?

"Gee, honey, want to see the new Star Wars movie?"
"I don't know... what's it about?"
"Solo."
"Solo? Like the cups?"
"No. Solo, like the character."
"Napoleon Solo? The Man From UNCLE? They made another one?"
"No. Han Solo."
"Who?"

I would argue the title merely says who is at the center of the movie, not what the movie IS. Let's look at the Bourne movies. Which title gives you a sense of what the movie IS:
The Bourne Identity
Jason Bourne.

This is the biggest brand in the WORLD and this is the most exciting and inspiring title they could come up with? Marketing geniuses.
 
I don't understand your point of view

Solo the perfect name, it doesn't need explanation, it doesn't need a subtitle.

Everything is explained in the single word.
 
Norwegians national soft drink since the 30's.

34d880391fb7af7cd945c1bcb0fe7dcb.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top