• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Discovery and "The Orville" Comparisons

Orville is just too swallow, Captain Lorca would have just kill the krill children because the krills were targeting federations children


This is not mature or deep.

This would just be TV that would be worthless suckage.

Anyway, "Krill" may be my least favorite Orville episode but I enjoyed it. All of the episodes have been good - light fun in some surprising ways, but good in most of the same ways that Trek was when Trek was worth a spit.

I have no beef with McFarlane's POV about religion; it's fairly widespread, if still a minority view, among younger folks.
 
Last edited:
This is not mature or deep.

This would just be TV that would be worthless suckage.

Sisko did the same thing to the The Maquis colony making it unhabitable to stop their terror attack and it worked when he threaten to do to the rest of their colonies.
 
I've actually come to hate the Orville....
In general, I've observed a tendency for people to glorify the Orville as a mean to downgrade DSC..... I know this is a specific Orville VS DSC thread, but I see it everywhere.... just feels wrong for Trekkies to do really, feels like flirting with another woman but your wife... ;)
I just really don't care about The Orville at all... what I've seen from it looks funny and really conveys the spirit of TNG, but this all 'watch me gush over Orville while thrashing DSC'-thing annoys me like hell...
 
I will give credit to the episode.

It nicely shows the heroes attempts to wage war, "Right" is a doomed cause even if I admire them for minimizing the collateral damage.
 
Sisko did the same thing to the The Maquis colony making it unhabitable to stop their terror attack and it worked when he threaten to do to the rest of their colonies.

Excuse me, but so the fuck what? "Sisko did it" does not make something good.

Pretending that Star Trek is mature storytelling is a kind of fannish self-flattery that the corporation is more than willing to humor for the sake of money. Just enjoy the Space War and be happy with that.
 
I've actually come to hate the Orville....
In general, I've observed a tendency for people to glorify the Orville as a mean to downgrade DSC..... I know this is a specific Orville VS DSC thread, but I see it everywhere.... just feels wrong for Trekkies to do really, feels like flirting with another woman but your wife... ;)
I just really don't care about The Orville at all... what I've seen from it looks funny and really conveys the spirit of TNG, but this all 'watch me gush over Orville while thrashing DSC'-thing annoys me like hell...
So, you're still going to watch it, right? ;)
 
Excuse me, but so the fuck what? "Sisko did it" does not make something good.

Pretending that Star Trek is mature storytelling is a kind of fannish self-flattery that the corporation is more than willing to humor for the sake of money. Just enjoy the Space War and be happy with that.

Versus "what?"

Shakespeare was a comedian who wrote trashy dramas and propaganda.

What is "Mature"?
 
I divorced Trek a while ago after catching her in bed with Sheldon Cooper.
They were just playing doctor.

nSkp7ZP.jpg
 
Excuse me, but so the fuck what? "Sisko did it" does not make something good.

Pretending that Star Trek is mature storytelling is a kind of fannish self-flattery that the corporation is more than willing to humor for the sake of money. Just enjoy the Space War and be happy with that.
Utter ridiculous, you actually think Orville is as mature as Star Trek.
 
Agreed! Axanar, Orville, it's all 'real' Trek while DSC sucks and betrays the very foundation of Trek.... give me a break. Just makes me dislike Axanar and Orville because of this attitude.....

Personally, I try not make a judgment on the quality of a show due to its fans.

Prelude to Axanar was a decent idea with very little story behind it that thrived for no other reason than its format. Based on the script I read, Axanar proper would have been a piece of trash with beautiful effects.

Orville is entertaining but there’s something that doesn’t quite sit right with me. Part of it, I think, is from the over abundance of 20th and 21st century pop culture references in a show set the 25th century. I had some serious issues with the last episode but it’s not enough to make me tune out.

Discovery is an interesting concept. I like the characters for the most part and the idea of a science ship being conscripted for war is a cool idea. It’s a little flawed in its execution, not only in the show’s main premise but also in the Klingon culture. (I don’t give a fuck about the makeup.) Also, the writing could be a little stronger.

These three are also markably different concepts. Despite how one may feel about the people in charge, Axanar is a fan film. Period. Orville is a sci-fi action adventure series that plays homage to Star Trek of the past. Discovery is an attempt to bring Star Trek into the 21st century, warts and all.

Low blow there. :p

LOL... Have you seen some of the Facebook comments? My comment ain’t far off.
 
Utter [sic] ridiculous, you actually think Orville is as mature as Star Trek.

I think you've fixed on a peculiar and inapplicable standard here - "mature" - which seems to mean something mysterious to you. I say "mysterious," because the story examples you've offered illustrate no maturity at all.

Cynicism is not mature. Acquiescence to evil behavior because Reasons is neither mature nor admirable. Yet these are the things you cite.

I'm also not sure your descriptions show an understanding of what Sisko actually did in the episode that you keep pounding away on.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top