• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Seth MacFarlane’s The Orville

Looks more like a saturation thing to me. The top image looks heavily saturated, while the bottom one appears as though it is under more normal lighting and has been desaturated (not saying you did that).

Both clips were on youtube, one right after the other :shrug: If anything was done, it wasn't by me :lol:
 
McFarlane Skyped in to NYCC yesterday and indicated that he's optimistic about renewal:

When the topic of the show’s future came up and whether he was optimistic about getting a second season, MacFarlane responded, “I’m exhaling for the first time since we started.”

I know very little - okay, I know nothing - about what Fox expects from its shows or what network ratings mean these days, but with that little caveat it sure looks to me like The Orville is in iffy territory.
 
We have a six-star rank: Admiral of the Navy. Dewey was promoted to it. The Army version is General of the Armies of the US.
 
Last edited:
McFarlane Skyped in to NYCC yesterday and indicated that he's optimistic about renewal:



I know very little - okay, I know nothing - about what Fox expects from its shows or what network ratings mean these days, but with that little caveat it sure looks to me like The Orville is in iffy territory.

Maybe. But I hope it makes it. Just as I hope Discovery makes it.
Both: Warts and All.
 
22365393_10214472444834968_6180577654195715672_n.jpg
 
The good news - for the moment - is that The Orville is currently Fox's third most successful show with the 18-49 demographic (behind Empire and The Simpsons) and the network's second most successful show in terms of overall viewership (behind Empire).

Complete network chart here.

It's hard for an old guy like me to get my mind around how low viewership numbers are now and what's considered a "success." For example, Discovery is showing to a subscriber base that started out somewhere below two million and that CBS hopes will top 4 million in the near future. None of the current crop of sf or fantasy shows are playing to the kinds of numbers that Trek - or Xena or The X-Files - did in the 1990s and as a result none are truly mass phenomena as those shows were. The Internet connects people and enlarges our sense of ourselves as the audience in a wholly different way than the good old days when my hair was dark and I had all my teeth. :D
 
Last edited:
It's hard for an old guy like me to get my mind around how low viewership numbers are now and what's considered a "success." For example, Discovery is showing to a subscriber base that started out somewhere below two million and that CBS hopes will top 4 million in the near future. None of the current crop of sf or fantasy shows are playing to the kinds of numbers that Trek - or Xena or The X-Files - did in the 1990s and as a result none are truly mass phenomena as those shows were. The Internet connects people and enlarges our sense of ourselves as the audience in a wholly different way than the good old days when my hair was dark and I had all my teeth. :D
The irony is that there are probably more people watching stuff than ever before...
...just not at all the same time or the same way.
 
I read how difficult it is for the SNL people to spoof a tv show that everyone knows. The last one was probably Lost.
 
Last edited:
I like Picard in the white, and could totally see him as one of the stuffy Admirals giving orders to Kirk, Janeway, Archer and Sisko as contemporaries in a Fleet during one of the movie era 5 year missions or a reimagined TOS. ;)

Now thats one elseworlds I would *love* to see.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top