I'm reasonably sure that PTSD is a clinical diagnosis that few people here would be qualified to make. Were there someone in this discussion qualified to make such a clinical judgement, I would submit that she or he would not yet have enough evidence to make a diagnosis.
Is there not scope to see Burnham's actions as human (with all the concomitant potential for stupidity and rationality and everything in between) without trying to pathologise them? Not trying to stick my head in the tardigrade's mouth here, I'm just asking
Is there not scope to see Burnham's actions as human (with all the concomitant potential for stupidity and rationality and everything in between) without trying to pathologise them? Not trying to stick my head in the tardigrade's mouth here, I'm just asking
