Y'know, I understand your thinking here, but some of the commentary is coming from a place of seeing something not live up to past expectations.I would say, that if you're not enjoying the series at this point, this should have broken the thin ice for you. There's more of the same on the way... so I'm not sure why anyone's would hang on at this point if you continue to be disgruntled.
steaming pile of poo killed it.
.
What do we know about Corvan 2? Memory Alpha says it's a planet from TNG's 'New Ground' episode.... but also says it provides 40% of the Federation's dilithium. Same planet?
No, they don't. Just like Trek has always done with a lot of other things, ignore it when it's not necessary.It wouldn't have been necessary, if it wasn't for DS9 mentioning it in the Tribble episode, and ENT making the loss of ridges canonical in its fourth season. Now at minimum they need to show ridgeless human-looking Klingons somewhere.
The Klingons of TOS bear little resemblance, and I'm talking how they are characterized, to their TNG counterparts.Appearance is one thing, but the characterization from TOS to the movies to TNG era seemed to elaborate and build on itself. These Klingons are nothing like what would grow into what we see in TOS.
It wouldn't have been necessary, if it wasn't for DS9 mentioning it in the Tribble episode, and ENT making the loss of ridges canonical in its fourth season. Now at minimum they need to show ridgeless human-looking Klingons somewhere.
What do we know about Corvan 2? Memory Alpha says it's a planet from TNG's 'New Ground' episode.... but also says it provides 40% of the Federation's dilithium. Same planet?
They didn't arrive until Tuesday.I thought it strange that a planet that provided 40% of the Federation's dilithium crystals didn't have better defenses like a small fleet of ships for protection.
I thought it strange that a planet that provided 40% of the Federation's dilithium crystals didn't have better defenses like a small fleet of ships for protection.
Y'know, I understand your thinking here, but some of the commentary is coming from a place of seeing something not live up to past expectations.
You can write that off as nostalgia goggles but it's a real thing.
There's no denying it now...and no reason to keep punishing yourself if that's what you're holding out for.
Starfleet believes a good defense is an deus ex machina defense.
It wouldn't have been necessary, if it wasn't for DS9 mentioning it in the Tribble episode, and ENT making the loss of ridges canonical in its fourth season. Now at minimum they need to show ridgeless human-looking Klingons somewhere.
Its defenses were built by the same company that made the Mars Defense Perimeter.
Isn't dilithium renewable by TNG?
No, they don't. Just like Trek has always done with a lot of other things, ignore it when it's not necessary.
The Klingons of TOS bare little resemblance, and I'm talking how they are characterized, to their TNG counterparts.
Being cannibals was very unsettling, and this kind of radical departure
I would say, that if you're not enjoying the series at this point, this should have broken the thin ice for you. There's more of the same on the way... so I'm not sure why anyone's would hang on at this point if you continue to be disgruntled.
But how is he going to pay the REEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNT?
At the risk of being called pedantic, the Klingons are technically not cannibals.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.