There is an episode of the podcast The Orb which discusses director Cliff Bole. Part of the episode reflects on the unwillingness of some directors to work with child actors. The decision to use Jake in a script was probably done with the directors in mind.On that note, does anyone know why that was? What was the deal with Cirroc Lofton's contract? How was he ostensibly a regular despite appearing in less than half the series?
On that note, does anyone know why that was? What was the deal with Cirroc Lofton's contract? How was he ostensibly a regular despite appearing in less than half the series?
There is an episode of the podcast The Orb which discusses director Cliff Bole. Part of the episode reflects on the unwillingness of some directors to work with child actors. The decision to use Jake in a script was probably done with the directors in mind.
It's likely they wrote themselves into a corner with Jake. They didn't write for him consistently, thus he didn't really get full development. The whole thing about writing and journalism was interesting, but it meant that he would be more or less confined to being an observer and interpreter, not an agent. And the last season was very lopsided: after a few connected episodes, there was a slew of bottle shows to pay the bills with paramount, followed by the 10 episode arc. Jake wasn't big enough to carry his own episode; he didn't have a place in the war; and the writers crammed the arc with so much detail as to be suffocating at times.The behind-the-scenes of Cirroc Lofton's situation on this show is something I've wondered about a lot. Since they lost interest in him so completely the last season or two, did they discuss just cutting him from the cast and sending Jake to study at the Pennington School? That's totally what you'd do today. Back then, it felt like an outgrowth of an attitude that: your regulars are your regulars. You have committed to these characters, and you're sticking with them unless something weird happens that forces a shake-up. (I wish TV would swing back this way a little, now we're too far in the direction of "characters come and go constantly as story dictates!")
Maybe I'm misremembering the episode, but wasn't Jake the voice of reason in “Valiant” and Nog the one with questionable motives?
I think I remember reading somewhere that the Sisko/Jake relationship was crucial to Avery Brooks because it's something we never see represented in entertainment -- a black man being a great single father to a son. It was a corrective to what we see portrayed much more frequently, the story of the absentee black father. I had never considered the Sisko/Jake relationship in that context before -- and it sort of blew my mind that I hadn't. I already liked the Sisko/Jake relationship, but that made me appreciate it even more.
The same could be said for Benjamin Sisko. He's been literally shipped out of the series.Always thought that in the end, Jake should've been traded with Nog as series regular.
I am neither disliking nor particularly fond of the character.
In the post-DS9 relaunch novels, he rarely appears, whereas Nog is a series regular now.
He's like Andrew Robinson, not a full on regular. They had a large cast of regular actors and yet they still managed to give even semi-regular actors a presence so powerful, that even today we're amazed that they weren't full time.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.