Why debate this now?
I wish I had this sentiment as an auto reply to so many threads.

Why debate this now?
Why debate this now? The show premieres next month -- we'll find out the actual answers then, and presumably these fragments will make sense once we know the context.
Since when was it a bad thing to explore possibilities?
She's arguably way more qualified for command than Kirk was at the end of Trek XI.But I wonder how one year as XO makes her qualified for command...
In the TNG S1 episode "The Arsenal of Freedom" Riker says he turned down Command of the U.S.S. Drake to serve as First Officer aboard the 1701-D; so yeah that guy just didn't want a command.They were trying to give Riker a command pretty quickly as well. He just kept turning them down.
Pfft. Starfleet order #612 states that if your father died heroically fighting someone and you come up against them, you get an immediate promotion to command in order to ensure you have the proper chance to avenge them.She's arguably way more qualified for command than Kirk was at the end of Trek XI.
Which means that if he didn't turn down the offer, he would have gone from Lt. Commander straight to Captain.In the TNG S1 episode "The Arsenal of Freedom" Riker says he turned down Command of the U.S.S. Drake to serve as First Officer aboard the 1701-D; so yeah that guy just didn't want a command.
Really? Wasn't he First Officer/Commander on the Hood, too?Which means that if he didn't turn down the offer, he would have gone from Lt. Commander straight to Captain.
I had to look it up.Really? Wasn't he First Officer/Commander on the Hood, too?
I had to look it up.
According to Memory Alpha, Riker was a Lt. Commander while serving on the Hood, and was both promoted to Commander and posted to the Enterprise in 2364.
For the sake of argument, if we stretch it to the maximum, having DeSoto promote him to Commander really early in 2364 then having his assignment to the Enterprise in really late 2364, that still means they offered him a ship of his own with only a year as Commander under his belt. (Which would also have been after only one year at Lt. Commander.)http://www.startrek.com/database_article/riker-william
But this suggests that whilst both occured in 2364 - the promotion to Commander occured, and then the transfer to the Enterprise happened afterwards but neither were dependent on the other.
Which means that if he didn't turn down the offer, he would have gone from Lt. Commander straight to Captain.
For the sake of argument, if we stretch it to the maximum, having DeSoto promote him to Commander really early in 2364 then having his assignment to the Enterprise in really late 2364, that still means they offered him a ship of his own with only a year as Commander under his belt. (Which would also have been after only one year at Lt. Commander.)
Short version point...Burnham's potential promotion is not unprecedented, which was the whole reason it got brought up in the first place.![]()
Exactly what Christopher is saying. You don't have to hold the rank of "Captain" in order to be a "captain" of a vessel.Small ships can be captained by officers of commander rank or below (and in real navies, usually are). Cf. Worf and Dax commanding the Defiant. The Making of Star Trek says that Kirk's first command was a destroyer-equivalent vessel, but it doesn't specify whether he held captain's rank at the time.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.