I don't exactly welcome them, but I don't see much point in objecting to their existence either. Not least because none of them actually exist yet...
Those were good, but let's not overstate things. Two of the best sequels.Everyone should remember that Cameron made the best sequels of all time with Aliens and T2.
So he's telegraphing that the Main Villain will never have any serious moments where his demise could happen in A2,A3 or A4. Whatever situation he's in, he escapes. This sounds like 80s Hollywood, you have one script, change locations, maybe add one unique element and blammo, you have your "new" movie.James Cameron have revealed that Stephen Lang's Col. Quaritch will return as the main villain for all four of his planned Avatar sequels.
He also said that the four movies are "one big story", and "a greater narrative broken up into four complete stories".
It wasn't the only source, it was just a *really* big deposit, all concentrated in one place. Easier and more profitable to mine than anywhere else they'd found elsewhere on the moon.I found it hard to believe that the only source of anti gravity minerals (help Earth how exactly?) was under the tree, and that they had to fell (and then the bigger job of clearing it away) the tree to get at it. The message got in the way of the story.
I heard somewhere that this movie was inspired by Frank Herbert's "Pandora" series, which was more interesting.
The secret is I knew it wasn't the only source of unobtainium, or whatever they said it was. If Cameron had decided to tell a story instead of preach, his antagonists would more likely found it preferable to mine the stuff elsewhere without having to go to war to do it. It's always easier to mine when natives aren't trying to kill you—rightfully so. I mean, who's got the high tech here and can travel 4 light-years? What's setting up shop away from natives?
Would have been a better movie if it envolved real estate developers with their hearts set on building resorts for human vacationers.
Avatar, Titanic, Terminator 2, Aliens, Terminator. Avatar is the highest grossing movies of all time, Titanic WAS the highest grossing movie of all time for 12 years, before being pushed to number two by Avatar. He is also a notorious control freak. The studios don't tell Cameron what to do or how to do it.Cameron wanted a trilogy, he has since then allowed the studios to turn it into a 5 movie story against his idea and spread it out, returning the main dead villain to life etc
Something tells me he either has little or no control over his creation anymore and this will be 90% their decision, or he doesn't care after netting a massive paycheck and...well same outcome.
But then since this won't hit the cinema until the 2020's, either no one will remember the original or won't care.
Way more but any adaptations would likely invite the ire of the religious right.I heard somewhere that this movie was inspired by Frank Herbert's "Pandora" series, which was more interesting.
Everyone should remember that Cameron made the best sequels of all time with Aliens and T2.
People should not assume the Avatar sequels will succumb to the same sense of diminishing returns as most franchises.
I'm not saying they'll be great, but that Cameron being underestimated and mocked as people wait for his films has becomes so predictable that I can't see myself jumping on that bandwagon, no matter how much conventional wisdom would support it.
Certainly, but the issue is that Cameron wants to make three sequels right away instead of slowly building up through each one. Saying the paper-thin, one-dimensional villain from the first is going to be the primary villain for all three doesn't help either.People have now become used to the cadence of sequels. It used to be that a film franchise had a shelf life of 3 (trilogy) if you're lucky after which it usually jumped the shark. Now we have not only franchises with more than 3 films but multiple franchises that move in parallel and cross-over. So the blockbuster landscape is more akin to television series and spinoffs these days. You can question whether Avatar has enough breadth to justify this sort of treatment, but it's not that radical an idea.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.