Yeah, but the physical design of Starfleet ships, while visually plausible, make no real engineering sense.
I think alot of the backlash was because all the 24th century fans wanted a new show in that era or later - and anything else (much like ST: D is for some of those same fans) was/is a huge disappointment to them.
Of course not.
The design worked so well initially because interested viewers could identify, or at least make a good guess, at the location and function of all the ship stuff by looking at it. The Enterprise looks rationally constructed (for its time). That's all.
And, for every 2-3 fans who are whining about "why don't they take some risks in ship design," the showrunners know damn well there's another 10-20 "fans" who would lynch them if the Starfleet saucer and nacelle design went away.
Fun fact: hippo is actually Latin for "horse" and a hippopotamus is a "water horse." So, are you trying to compare a horse to a horse?Honestly, I hate the Akira design but I rather like the NX class. They have some broad similarities but massively different proportions and details -- like a hippo vs. a race horse. Also, the NX is loaded with all sorts of subtle design homages to the pilot and TOS Enterprise, because Doug Drexler and the design team were determined to cram in as many authentic details as they could despite the execs' insistence on an Akira-based look. It's a design that's more impressive in fine detail than in broad strokes.
That's assuming the shape of the ship even has much of an influence on how effective the FTL drive works.
I'm not saying you're wrong but given that all this tech is fictional, it's pretty much open for debate how much variety in ship shapes is too much.
Isn't when you get down to it that the first Enterprise is just a flying sauser with jets connected to a engine looking thing. I can see why they went with that look in the 60's.
Wow, you really don't realize how insulting it is to say your opinion is "certainly" the right one at the same time you acknowledge mine is different?
It's also not clear if you accept that one influence is retrofuturism.
Which may explain the negative response to them.I don't "accept" anything of the sort, and the very phrasing is condescending. I see nothing retro in these designs, and you have yet to explain what specific design elements seem retro to you and in what ways. Hell, if their goal was nostalgia, wouldn't they have based them on "The Cage"? Their total dissimilarity to TOS uniforms seems like a pretty clear indication that they aren't meant to invoke the past.
Which may explain the negative response to them.
I never have. Otherwise I would never enjoy anythingThere's always negative response to everything new, especially before anyone's actually seen it in context. Nearly everything that people end up loving after they finally see it gets a negative response in advance. And it's not everyone; it's just a vocal minority. The people who yell and complain inevitably make more noise than the people who are fine with it. It's important not to mistake volume for consensus.
Um, actually the response across the board is very positive for the uniforms, with the exception of the Talifans. Just a few Trekkies here and there. Not sure where you are seeing negative response. The gallery at SDCC in particular was a monster hit with the elaborate uniforms on display.Which may explain the negative response to them.
I think the only thing that I watched and wanted to watch in the last few years that was so bad I gave up on it was "Terror Nova" and the American version of "Life on Mars."
Personally, continuity questions aside, I think the uniforms look very good. I've always liked blue uniforms. I'm not sure about the use of metallic highlights to indicate department, since they aren't as easy to tell apart as the old red/gold/blue, but it's a pretty snazzy design overall. And I like the white medical uniforms, which have a TMP feel.
Didn't those both star Jason O'Mara? Either it's a coincidence, or maybe you just don't like him.![]()
I did notice the Jason O'Mara connection. Which is why I was pleasantly surprised how much I did like him on "Agents of Shield." Perhaps the lesson is he should never be a series lead but instead a supporting character.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.