• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

How do you feel about human augmentation?

This might be the one instance when all that Kirlian aura crap is worth anything.
A severed finger won't have one.

Actually I think it was CSI or something some enterprising crook took the finger skinned it and used that finger as a "glove" over their actual finger to fool a device.

Hmm. I wonder if the Kirlian aura would remain.
 
This may sound controversial, but I would require everyone to be physically augmented, just to make sure that everyone will be normal, i.e. a world full of "Captain America(s)", rather than a world of "Khan(s)", you know. Otherwise, there will be the inevitable "pecking order", and that normal illnesses will be a thing of the past. As for "enhanced augmentations": that might have some restrictions on it, especially on the military applications end.
 
I would have thought enhanced soldiers that can fight better would be a bonus for the military and they'd love that.
 
This may sound controversial, but I would require everyone to be physically augmented, just to make sure that everyone will be normal, i.e. a world full of "Captain America(s)", rather than a world of "Khan(s)", you know. Otherwise, there will be the inevitable "pecking order", and that normal illnesses will be a thing of the past. As for "enhanced augmentations": that might have some restrictions on it, especially on the military applications end.
And what happens when Captain America goes 'rogue' as in the Civil War movie?
 
I would have thought enhanced soldiers that can fight better would be a bonus for the military and they'd love that.
No they would love enhanced soldiers that fight better and don't question orders - mindless super automatons, the 'I was only obeying orders' soldier.
 
Last edited:
No they would love enchanced soldiers that fight better and don't question orders - mindless super automatons, the 'I was only obeying orders' soldier.

They would wouldn't they?

Well hey we might have genetic testing of workers in the USA. So that DNA database hmmmmm so many ideas.
 
Cash is already on the way out. .
I happened to be reading a book about this, The Curse of Cash by Kenneth S. Rogoff.

He suggests that governments phase out cash. Coins would still exist, but we would mainly use debit cards and such.

The author does mention cryptocurrencies. I have wondered if one or more of these will become well established.

If you try to envision the future, you may consider what may have disappeared. For example, old fashioned newspapers are a dying industry.
 
I just want one of those fancy glass tablets they have in Deus Ex.

They are completely see through but can be used as a newspaper or a book and have videos on them. The concept looks cool I just wish they were real.
 
He suggests that governments phase out cash. Coins would still exist, but we would mainly use debit cards and such.

Coins are exactly the thing I want to get rid off. Getting specific coins for specific services (laundrette, public toilets) can be a pain in the neck. You may have the money but not the coins - it's almost like a separate currency.

Plus, I don't think dead-tree newspapers are dying. Losing market share, yes, but in the countries I've seen they still go strong. Especially the free ones, of course.

I just want one of those fancy glass tablets they have in Deus Ex.

They are completely see through but can be used as a newspaper or a book and have videos on them. The concept looks cool I just wish they were real.

Pretty darn sure all the big-name companies are working on that. The problem is to translate all your hardware (battery, camera, microchip) into see-through circuitry.
 
Coins are exactly the thing I want to get rid off. Getting specific coins for specific services (laundrette, public toilets) can be a pain in the neck. You may have the money but not the coins - it's almost like a separate currency.

Plus, I don't think dead-tree newspapers are dying. Losing market share, yes, but in the countries I've seen they still go strong. Especially the free ones, of course.



Pretty darn sure all the big-name companies are working on that. The problem is to translate all your hardware (battery, camera, microchip) into see-through circuitry.


I thought most of that was hidden in the edges of the devices where they seem to have some sort of border or darker non clear section.

There's other devices like the pocket secretaries have two metal ends but open to a transparent screen that lights up showing text and graphics. Again I suspect the circuitry is hidden in the ends which are not see through.
 
I thought most of that was hidden in the edges of the devices where they seem to have some sort of border or darker non clear section.

There's other devices like the pocket secretaries have two metal ends but open to a transparent screen that lights up showing text and graphics. Again I suspect the circuitry is hidden in the ends which are not see through.
That is a clever compromise.
 
This includes artificial limbs, organs or prosthetics that enable people to live a somewhat normal life under ideal circumstances.

How do you feel about the whole notion of artificial parts for the human body that allow it to have functions that were once lost again, or enhance functions that are damaged?

If I lost an arm or leg and could get one that functioned just like the old organic one I'd be fine with that. As it stands I do have prosthetics in the form of two lenses attached permanently to my eyes. Long story short I was born with cataracts and the original lenses were needled. This was 1968ish. Since then I have had to wear very thick and heavy glasses. The implants only came in 2007 and it was only because my optometrist suggested the idea to me in an effort to give me a cosmetic change and improve my appearance.

I haven't improved my vision as it's the same as it was with the heavy glasses but now I don't need those, instead a lighter, thinner pair for distance and slightly thick pair for reading / computer or books and stuff.

So in short I'm all for this kind of stuff.

How do you feel about this kind of stuff?

I'm highly receptive to any and all human enhancements that are emerging right now. I've been interested in the subject of transhumanism quite a bit over the course of the last 8 years or so.

The end of the completely biological humans is fast approaching its finale and I'm excited to partake in what's coming. I don't see it any more invasive or strange than using external devices to enhance our abilities. A smart phone in our pockets is just a more efficient and convenient combination of a variety of services we used to obtain through a variety of means, including physically visiting libraries. The next step is complete integration with the prefrontal cortex and we're already seeing this in experimental stage with neural lace experiments coming out of Boston in the last two years.

Whether it's cognitive enhancements, physical prosthetics, artificial organ replacements - I'm all for it. This is the way for humanity to overcome the greatest evil of our existence - mortality.

Most of the prosthetics and organs are still inferior to fully functioning natural equivalents, but as soon as they surpass the latter in every respect - I'll be in line for an upgrade. I'm not disabled in any way, but I'll definitely upgrade any and all parts of my body. This is one of my primary motivations in striving for continuously greater success career wise, because it won't be cheap.

Some of the specific upgrades I'm looking forward to:
* Direct-neural interface, preferably to an internal artificial database as well as enhanced processing capacity, but with an option to update through the cloud (direct to cloud interfaces are a bit too radical of ideas even for me, but we'll see how safe those will be)
* Upgrading every single vital organ to a vastly superior artificial one.
* Upgrading limbs to artificial ones
* Energy use overhaul (nothing specific is on the horizon, but eating can't possibly be the most efficient source of energy)
* Control and option to neutralize specific feelings, traits, instincts. These are mostly outdated considering that I no longer hunt in Africa's savannah.

The ultimate goal is an indefinite lifespan.
 
Last edited:
The ultimate goal is an indefinite lifespan.

Having certain political leaders living indefinitely leaves me with a feeling of dread, the one comfort I have when I consider leaders like President Robert Mugabe and others of his ilk (yes you Mr Trump and Mr Putin) is that one day..they will be dead. Forever.
Imagine a world of immortal Hitlers, Pol Pots and others...no thank you!
 
Last edited:
The ultimate goal is an indefinite lifespan.
No, the ultimate goal is maximum quality of life for the maximum feasible lifespan of a human being. Prolonging life at the expense of quality would simply consign people to a living hell that never really ends.

Immortality is a silly pipe dream. We'll probably figure out how to eliminate the need for SLEEP centuries before we figure out how to prevent death.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top