Are they considered any good?
What authority did Arnold have a year before TNG? Roddenberry had no authority on TVH, so why would Arnold?As said, TMP is an insight into the pure Roddenberry ideal of Trek. II-IV are superb in expanding on the screen/script material, though you can apparently spot which page of IV McIntyre was on when Richard Arnold said "Stop that".
The later ones do their best to cope with "As on screen" limits, but with decreasing success.
What authority did Arnold have a year before TNG? Roddenberry had no authority on TVH, so why would Arnold?
I've always been curious about the astonishing luck that someone had in naming Sulu's "new ship" Excelsior in the TWOK novel. I mean, even if it was in the actual script for the scene that got cut they certainly weren't thinking "Excelsior will be a ship in the next movie as a rival / replacement for the Enterprise". And if it WASN'T in the script and VM invented it whole then I also can't imagine someone going back to the novel of TWOK and grabbing the name from there. (They certainly didn't elaborate on Saavik's back story from either the novel of script of TWOK.) Then nine years later Meyer makes TUC and gives Sulu the Excelsior, lining up with a plot thread that had never even been whispered on screen. Remarkable.
There's an old urban legend that the TMP novel was ghostwritten by Alan Dean Foster, which as I understand it originated both with a misprinted foreign edition, and the fact that ADF actually did ghostwrite the Star Wars novelization that was credited to George Lucas. TMP isn't written anything like an ADF novel, and if you know even a bit about Roddenberry, it's obviously him. Tells include the weird, juvenile sexuality, futurism, and sexual futurism, and my favorite, long lines of italic text, emphasizing whole sentences at a time. That's something you might do (as an underline) in a script to emphasize some description of particular emphasis, but is generally considered excessive in a novel.
Rimmer: After intensive investigation, comma, of the markings on the alien pod, comma, it has become clear, comma, to me, comma, that we are dealing, comma, with a species of awesome intellect, colon.
Holly: Good. Perhaps they might be able to give you a hand with your punctuation.
If I recall correctly, the Excelsior subplot in TWOK was both scripted and filmed, but obviously cut. Someone on here had posted a link to the audio not long ago.
So given that the novelization was built off the early script drafts, and given that Nick Meyer was involved in the writing and direction of both films, it's actually not too crazy.
The TMP novelization is fascinating. Lots of quirky stuff about New Humans (oh, 70's Gene...you're so interesting) and other little sub plots. There were scenes from earlier versions of the film (EVA sequence, etc) that are featured, as well as a jarring and graphic expansion on the transporter accident. It's a nice companion piece to the movie.
TWOK expands a lot on Saavik and David and goes into a LOT more detail exploring the Regula 1 scientists and their plot line. There's a really graphic chapter that describes, in unnecessary detail, what happened when Khan arrived at the station looking for Genesis.
TSFS is mind numbing and self-indulgent. Most of the novel doesn't follow or relate to the movie at all. It's really only the last several chapters that resemble anything that the movie was.
I haven't read TVH since the late 80s. Nothing too interesting there.
The TFF novelization is a great companion piece to the film, and fills in so many of the plot holes rather nicely. Big expansion on Sybok's character and motives, Nimbus III, and other character's "secret pains."
The TUC novelization is very similar in terms of being complimentary to the feature film. Nice subplot about how certain incidents leading up,to the events of the film had increased tensions to the brink of open war.
Yes. 1) I too thought it was ADF.There's an old urban legend that the TMP novel was ghostwritten by Alan Dean Foster, which as I understand it originated both with a misprinted foreign edition, and the fact that ADF actually did ghostwrite the Star Wars novelization that was credited to George Lucas. TMP isn't written anything like an ADF novel, and if you know even a bit about Roddenberry, it's obviously him. Tells include the weird, juvenile sexuality, futurism, and sexual futurism, and my favorite, long lines of italic text, emphasizing whole sentences at a time. That's something you might do (as an underline) in a script to emphasize some description of particular emphasis, but is generally considered excessive in a novel.
Agree, TMP novel is good.I read the Motion Picture novel. It's a fascinating look at how Gene Roddenberry imagined the Star Trek universe.
....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.