And now you're implying I'm some kind of joyless freak for asking tough questions about the movie. If you don't want to engage with my points, don't engage with them. There's no need to publicly question my ability to enjoy entertainment while you don't reply to me.I wasn't telling you to dumb down your analysis, I was just commenting.
I honestly have to wonder like you can ever enjoy anything.
So, again: "was there a Sir Morgan in-universe, or did Ares lead his entire life from birth? The Brits are pretty rigid about who's a Knight and an MP and all that. Was Ares just goading Morgan on like he was Ludendorff? If so, then I agree with those who said his true form, flashbacks included, shouldn't have been Professor Lupin."Posing as. That's my only criticism of the movie is they skipped too quickly to the beam warfare instead of having Ares do his subtle window trickery some more. It's actually quite clever, what's gong on there and the importance of having Ares be a Brit, but it's brushed by far too quickly.
Obviously. But, to me, whose ass she was kicking - no, killing - matters, at least a little bit. (And again, when the movie wants you to cheer numerous German deaths while never once wanting you to cheer an Allied death - I don't think Ares really counts as an Allied casualty, in his larger context - your statement that "the German soldiers were just soldiers who weren't judged anymore than Steve Trevor was" is objectively false.)And yes, there was cheering during the action sequences, but (again, to me) that was more finally seeing a female superhero kicking ass in her own film regardless of whose asses she kicked.
After all, shouldn't action movie feminism aspire to a bit more than being just as mindless as male-centric action movies? Look, I'm not calling this an immoral or venomous movie along the lines of Bayformers or London Has Fallen. It's fine, a perfectly average, competent popcorn flick with a terrific lead performance. But, again, in a movie discussion thread, I reserve the right to discuss the movie I paid good money to see.

Yes. Someone who doesn't know what the mere concept of marriage is, and has zero knowledge of human history or contemporary world politics, not to mention a complete ignorance of the human capacity for being cruel to others is, intellectually speaking, a child. Children learn about the viciousness of the species in part by going to school, and experiencing childish fights and meanness that gradually educate them about how even adults, who should know and be better, can also be mean and awful to each other. It's a key aspect of social and emotional development - but, as the only child on Themiscyra, Diana never even learned that. Which, yes, makes her profoundly childish and ignorant, and that's a very dangerous trait for a warrior who unconcernedly kills her opponents - regardless of how many books on eroticism and anatomy she's read, or her ability to consent to sex.Also... child in intellectual terms?![]()