• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Voyager is the worst series.....Baloney!

Well when TNG started it was one of the few prime-time shows to be in the Sci_fi genre, by the time DSN and VOY rolled around there was more competition.

And as has already been pointed out there had been a slight downwards trend in viewing audiances of the years esp. live audiances.
 
VOYAGER is like the STAR WARS prequels.

Those who don't like it, have to make a lot of noise with definitive judgement.

A lot of put-down of VOYAGER is usually with the ajenda of pumping up DEEP SPACE NINE.

The criticisms of VOYAGER, and opinionated people's ideas of how it could have been better......are awful in my opinion.

Seeing the Voyager beat-up and battle damaged? Seeing the Starfleet & Maqui people have more friction?? Seeing everyone feeling more dispair at their plight??

How depressing! Really?! That's what you wanted? Please! That's for the geekiest of geeks. For most, who just want an hour of escapism without having to invest in too much sci-fi b.s., VOYAGER delivered.

VOYAGER was an antidote to DEEP SPACE NINE. Ratings don't lie-- DS9 wasn't cutting it. DS9 lost a good chunk of the TNG audience. Time has proven DS9 hasn't ever earned a wider audience, or is fondly remembered beyond its small hardcore audience. So, continuing that "darker" Trek was NOT the way to go.

To use the STAR WARS analogy again-- VOYAGER was like THE FORCE AWAKENS. It had to bring viewers back. It had to harken back to a more palatable version of Trek.

***************

Now, if I had to criticize anything about VOYAGER....it would be that it lacked spark and energy. That's because of the theory of "Franchise Fatigue" that was real. I don't think a female captain factored into the ratings, or criticism.

VOYAGER was just a TV show. But it was a well written, well cast, well produced series, and to pretend anything different is silly.
Why is it bad that people want to talk about how they feel the show is better? I get that if you love "Voyager" you might get tired of having you show compared to "DS9" but we are talking about shows that exsit as part as the same franchise so people are naturally going to compare the quality of the shows just like people compare "TOS" to "TNG" and so forth.
Also to some just being good escapist entertainment isn't enough. A lot of people do want shows to try and push the envelope and take chances. It's not enough to be good but you want something to be great. I don't mind "Voyager" being a popcorn adventure show, personally and I think it works on that level but why is it also wrong to wish it could have been more?

Jason
 
Why is it bad that people want to talk about how they feel the show is better? I get that if you love "Voyager" you might get tired of having you show compared to "DS9" but we are talking about shows that exsit as part as the same franchise so people are naturally going to compare the quality of the shows just like people compare "TOS" to "TNG" and so forth.
Also to some just being good escapist entertainment isn't enough. A lot of people do want shows to try and push the envelope and take chances. It's not enough to be good but you want something to be great. I don't mind "Voyager" being a popcorn adventure show, personally and I think it works on that level but why is it also wrong to wish it could have been more?

Jason
All Star Trek Series are popcorn escapism. There isn't one Trek show that is "more important" than another. They all have their "deep, contemplative" and their comedy episodes, etc.

They all have high production value, ambitious writing, and high caliber acting(especially Voyager). Berman era Trek series often sought threatre-trained actors for their casts. Almost all of Voyager's cast had established themselves on or off Broadway, except for one or two.

I disagree that these sorts of threads are constructive, as they are mostly divisive. For me personally, when one show is bedraggled over and over again by the same people on here, it makes me not want watch the show they're always praising(say DS9, a show I've always loved) and now whenever I watch DS9, I keep finding more and more cliché, more eye-rolling moments, more stuffy expo dumps, etc. That wouldn't have happened to me otherwise.
 
Why is it bad that people want to talk about how they feel the show is better? I get that if you love "Voyager" you might get tired of having you show compared to "DS9" but we are talking about shows that exsit as part as the same franchise so people are naturally going to compare the quality of the shows just like people compare "TOS" to "TNG" and so forth.
Also to some just being good escapist entertainment isn't enough. A lot of people do want shows to try and push the envelope and take chances. It's not enough to be good but you want something to be great. I don't mind "Voyager" being a popcorn adventure show, personally and I think it works on that level but why is it also wrong to wish it could have been more?

Jason
Whining over and over about not liking Voyager isn't going to change it though, is it? Like for me I don't value your arguments just on their lack of merit, so although someone has an absolute right to express their displeasure and they do, it is a talk they are not going to win out on. I've never posted on the DS9 board but I might pop over there and trash the show, lol. I have been very harsh about Discovery and it hasn't even started, but it does offend people, so you have to expect that. People notice too when the same ones are beating the same drum..
 
All Star Trek Series are popcorn escapism. There isn't one Trek show that is "more important" than another. They all have their "deep, contemplative" and their comedy episodes, etc.

They all have high production value, ambitious writing, and high caliber acting(especially Voyager). Berman era Trek series often sought threatre-trained actors for their casts. Almost all of Voyager's cast had established themselves on or off Broadway, except for one or two.

I disagree that these sorts of threads are constructive, as they are mostly divisive. For me personally, when one show is bedraggled over and over again by the same people on here, it makes me not want watch the show they're always praising(say DS9, a show I've always loved) and now whenever I watch DS9, I keep finding more and more cliché, more eye-rolling moments, more stuffy expo dumps, etc. That wouldn't have happened to me otherwise.
I totally agree Prax. It's all rather redundant now too because the shows have done their run. I looked over the ratings Quark put in his post and read through the comments. It didn't gel with me because ratings have context to the landscape of the times and programming, but also so many viewers are worldwide. Yet I also note Next Gen, DS9, and Voyager ran for seven seasons. That does mean something. How the new kid on the block, Discovery, is going to compare will simply be hard to read let alone compare.
 
All Star Trek Series are popcorn escapism. There isn't one Trek show that is "more important" than another. They all have their "deep, contemplative" and their comedy episodes, etc.

They all have high production value, ambitious writing, and high caliber acting(especially Voyager). Berman era Trek series often sought threatre-trained actors for their casts. Almost all of Voyager's cast had established themselves on or off Broadway, except for one or two.

I disagree that these sorts of threads are constructive, as they are mostly divisive. For me personally, when one show is bedraggled over and over again by the same people on here, it makes me not want watch the show they're always praising(say DS9, a show I've always loved) and now whenever I watch DS9, I keep finding more and more cliché, more eye-rolling moments, more stuffy expo dumps, etc. That wouldn't have happened to me otherwise.
In away I would say all tv and movies and music are escapism entertainment. I do think that some do try a little harder and sometimes take more risks that might not go over well with viewers just because they want to raise the bar and be something that people might not be used to and might not even like. Maybe they want people to think about a issue or just do something that hasn't isn't been done on tv or a specific genre or in case of TOS that would be tv and sci-fi of that era and with DS9 it was basically the Trek franchise.
"Voyager" when it was started I think was taking the "DS9" aproach of shaking up the Trek franchise again by going to the Delta quadrant so they wouldn't fall back on using familiar aliens or even familiar things like starfleet always being around. Like I said I even think they had some success with his idea in the first two seasons when Pillar was there. After that I feel like the show no longer had any bigger purpose other than to do a hour of typical trek entertainment. Sometimes they would do a issue show but not the point were I felt like that was what they wanted the show to be about.
Also there is no reason to get upset that someone doesn't like the show. What show on tv doesn't have people who dislike it? DS9 even has people who hate it. It doesn't really change anyone's opinion but that doesn't matter. Talking about is for fun because, one people like to complain,two people like to think how things could be different and three people like to defend stuff they like. The whole internet exisit for those reasons. Well that and porn.

Jason
 
Whining over and over about not liking Voyager isn't going to change it though, is it? Like for me I don't value your arguments just on their lack of merit, so although someone has an absolute right to express their displeasure and they do, it is a talk they are not going to win out on. I've never posted on the DS9 board but I might pop over there and trash the show, lol. I have been very harsh about Discovery and it hasn't even started, but it does offend people, so you have to expect that. People notice too when the same ones are beating the same drum..
Some people don't consider themselves just as DS9 fans. Some think of themselves as Star Trek fans which means every show or movie in the franchise is going to be of intrest to them. Where else are they supose to talk about their Voyager opinions if they don't talk about them in the forum created for people to talk about the show? As for being offended I supose that is a natural human reaction but like I said we are just talking about a tv show which means that on some level it doesn't matter if anyone likes it or dislikes. We can only make it have as much meaning as we want it to. I can't speak for everyone but I do value entertainment a lot and I said in other thread once that the only things that matter in life is fun and love. Still I like to feel like I am someone who is tolerant enough that people might not like some of the things I do so I try not to let it bother me if they insult my favorite show or movie. In fact I kind of like it that people are different and we all have different ideas. When someone complains about something I like it might not always change my mind but it does offer me a new insight into the show by seeing it from another perspective.

Jason
 
The whole internet exisit for those reasons. Well that and porn.
:lol:

I often hear people say that DS9 was just telling TNG stories until Pillar left after season 2(and somewhat s3). Could you give some examples of how the overall storytelling of Voy changed after season 2?
 
:lol:

I often hear people say that DS9 was just telling TNG stories until Pillar left after season 2(and somewhat s3). Could you give some examples of how the overall storytelling of Voy changed after season 2?
A few example's I would have would be how the Kazon and Vidians were droped from the show. I know the Kazon weren't popular but I liked their look and the basic idea that they are basically low level street gangs. I feel they could have been fixed. The more important problem though is that it made the Delta Quadrant feel like a big empty nothing filled with just random alien's of week. The Kazon and Vidians were partially created to give the DQ feel like a connected and living area of space much like familiar alien and starfleet do in that part of space.
It does bring up the question how "Voyager" could be flying in their space for seven years but that is one of those issue's like how can the Enterprise get back to earth in a single episode in season 5 if it is way off into deep space. It's something you either ignore or you come up with some idea to make it work. Also even if you want to move on then have something new to replace them. The Hirogen,Maelon and the Borg kind of feels that gap but the Borg are hurt by overuse and the others were hurt by not being used enough.. I will say that season 4 does feel a lot like the first two seasons in that you add Seven,Paris and torres become a couple you have several ep's with the array that allows them to contact earth and you create the Hirogen but after that the show sort of reverted back to season 3.

Also the first two season's you had a legit vilian in Seska and I even liked Culla. Seska could have been the show's Dukat and Suder could have been it's Garak. I feel like they were created to serve a bigger ongoing role for the show but when they killed them off we didn't get anything like that until the Borg kids and to be honest they didn't do much for me.
The starfleet/maquis stuff was used more in the first two season than in the later season's. First ep after the pilot is Torres becoming chief engineer over Carrey and then you had the ep were they steal the tech to get Voyager home behind Janeway's back and it blows up in their face. Seska turns out to be Carddisian and then becomes a bigger villian in season 2. You had the Hogan character and the spy who got killed by Neelix. Torres has to defuse the Cardisian missile she lauched while being with the Maquis or Suder being brought aboard as a Maquis or the "Learning Curve" ep were Tuvok has to train some of them to fit into starfleet life a little better. Then there is the ep were Janeway tries to take a more Maquis aproach and we meet the Trabe who used to enslave the Kazon.

Jason
 
Not my favorite Trek but after watching re-runs on BBC America I've come to appreciate it a bit more. There are some stand out episodes that are classic Trek and wonderfully acted. Picardo deserves more credit with what he did with "The Doctor" character.
 
Not my favorite Trek but after watching re-runs on BBC America I've come to appreciate it a bit more. There are some stand out episodes that are classic Trek and wonderfully acted. Picardo deserves more credit with what he did with "The Doctor" character.


Picardo was one of the best things about VOY.

Whining over and over about not liking Voyager isn't going to change it though, is it? Like for me I don't value your arguments just on their lack of merit, so although someone has an absolute right to express their displeasure and they do, it is a talk they are not going to win out on. I've never posted on the DS9 board but I might pop over there and trash the show, lol. I have been very harsh about Discovery and it hasn't even started, but it does offend people, so you have to expect that. People notice too when the same ones are beating the same drum..


Isn't a lot of this "whinning" actually someone critising some aspect() of the show. I can say "Living Witness" was one of the vest of episodes of VOY yet critise it for the huge plot hole regarding the EMH backup module despite being told a few episodes previously they couldn't create a backup of the EMH. See what I did, I gave it both praise and critisim.
 
When it was on fire, it really cooked in a way that none of the other shows did.

I'm one of those realist/glass half-empty types that sees all the flaws in Voyager. :p But on occasion, usually when I'd least expect it, Voyager would do one of those episodes where I'd just be left going, "Wow, just..... wow."

There are actually a lot of those individual moments across the seven seasons. I guess a lot of peoples disappointment with the show stems simply from the reality that those moments were not more frequent.
 
I have to wonder too if there isn't a hindsight distortion. In reality when you watch an episode in a series you don't sum it up as a whole or are ready to compare it with other series also in their entirety. I also call bullshit on some of these criticisms.. not the viewers right to have one, but the context that it has been recreated in. Example, it is sheer nonsense Voyager did not replenish and repair. I never thought it was a problem when I watched an episode and when I finished watching the entire series, or now.

The glass can be half full and half empty sort of works but I tend to think of filtering. When you take in Voyager if you see if for what it has become in relation to other shows, or as a failing, then that is what you will mostly see. The devil's advocate not to criticise just an aspect here and there but to view it as 'worst' will be what you get from it. Goes the other way for someone who enjoyed it. Mostly a fan is not going to become a hater though and the disappointed can enjoy that, lol.
 
At the end of the day it all comes down to personal tatse. Even with shows/film series that I like. There are certain elements/episodes/films etc.. that I don't care for as much. And it can be enjoyable to debate those elements and what you think might have made it better. Now we have no real way to know if any of these ideas would make the show better or worse or have no impact.
 
I have to wonder too if there isn't a hindsight distortion. In reality when you watch an episode in a series you don't sum it up as a whole or are ready to compare it with other series also in their entirety. I also call bullshit on some of these criticisms.. not the viewers right to have one, but the context that it has been recreated in. Example, it is sheer nonsense Voyager did not replenish and repair. I never thought it was a problem when I watched an episode and when I finished watching the entire series, or now.

.

But to some, they wonder how they can repair themselves so the ship looks like it had just left Utopia week after week. When we are told they can't replace a photon torpdeo. By extension that means large scale replication is a facility they don't have. So no replacement hull plates, shuttles, interior corridor panels etc..

Now it's not my fault as an audiance member if I critisie the writers for ingoring a self-imposed limitation. Limitations can be good as they force the writers to come up with creative ways to overcome problems.

But let me ask you a question, do you never see flaws or issues which you think could have been done better in shows that you watch?
 
Have you ever read sentneces taht mix lettres in the wrods but yuor brian cmoes to the rghit maening in the end? I must be wired like that because Voyager and her interior corridor panels, let alone how shiny her hull was, didn't bother me. I was satisfied to believe they traded, discovered and claimed resources along the way. It's not like they were the only warp capable vessel in the quadrant that needed upkeep. They were not unique to having to beg steal and borrow to keep going, other local space ships did too. And I remember them building the Delta Flyer, and her replacement was also mentioned as not taking that long to construct. Made sense to me. I also didn't use a week as a time frame of reference watching one episode to the next. For all I knew it was months, a year, between an episode and when they didn't have something to when they did.

Honestly, that was small stuff in my reckoning. If I get hung up on something background it's usually watching TV people eat a meal and getting annoyed they never finish it.

Let me ask you? What did you expect when Voyager needed a resource? Many episodes mention such and if that was not good enough, then what? If as one example, an episode like 'Tattoo' where an away team is looking for minerals to help the warp core becomes the reason they send a team to a planet and then something more interesting happens.. is that not enough? Really I could find many examples of Voyager obtaining resources if I put my mind to it ;)

Regards flaws in TV shows.. you betcha like everyone else I can see them. Just read this post if you get this far, I'm analytical and one can't escape the whole picture when one waffles on.
 
It's pretty well known that UPN meddled with the VOY premise almost from the get go. The freedom to tell stories the way the Producers wanted that DS9 and TNG had being in syndication was not afforded as much to VOY or ENT. UPN was not exactly a powerhouse broadcast network either which accounts for some of the latter Trek's ratings decline.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top