Amazing...*shakes head*
It's more the financial ramifications on Las Vegas and their "leadership" decisions.As an Oaklander, I can't really blame Mark Davis. It's the smart business decision. The incompetence of the mayor's office and Oakland city council has been a huge problem for years. Decades. When Jerry Brown was the mayor, he tried to get the city council and other Oakland leaders to talk about news stadiums for the A's and Raiders. The council wouldn't even discuss it. Blame the NFL and Davis all you want but this is squarely on the shoulders of Oakland's "leadership."
But, the NFL means money
No argument here.That's what it likes municipalities to think. But because these public financing deals are generally done through issuance of 20-year bonds, after inflation they generally wind up losing a metric fuckton of money.
Cities should not be in the business of subsidizing private enterprise. If Mark Davis wanted a mallpark of a stadium in Las Vegas, he could have done what every other developer does -- go to a bank and ask for a loan. Not suckle at the taxpayers' teat.
Cities should not be in the business of subsidizing private enterprise. If Mark Davis wanted a mallpark of a stadium in Las Vegas, he could have done what every other developer does -- go to a bank and ask for a loan. Not suckle at the taxpayers' teat.
Oakland looking into ways to force the Raiders out early, hope they find one.
Yes, because debt is debt and those 30-year bonds still have to be repaid no matter what.
Wouldn't it be Oakland on the hook for those bonds since they were the ones who issued them?
I think it'll be great to be able to go to Vegas for a weekend and see a game just like you'd see a show.
It'll be a very different dynamic.
They'll have shuttles from the hotels.
Infrastructure costs are nothing close to the near quarter of a billion dollars or more, that cities are typically asked to come up with on order to get an NFL stadium built.None? No infrastructure improvements.
I'm sorry for the Oakland fans, but I applaud the city of Oakland for not selling out it's taxpayers to make a billionaire, more of a billionaire.As an Oaklander, I can't really blame Mark Davis. It's the smart business decision. The incompetence of the mayor's office and Oakland city council has been a huge problem for years. Decades. When Jerry Brown was the mayor, he tried to get the city council and other Oakland leaders to talk about news stadiums for the A's and Raiders. The council wouldn't even discuss it. Blame the NFL and Davis all you want but this is squarely on the shoulders of Oakland's "leadership."
Amen.That's what it likes municipalities to think. But because these public financing deals are generally done through issuance of 20-year bonds, after inflation they generally wind up losing a metric fuckton of money.
Cities should not be in the business of subsidizing private enterprise. If Mark Davis wanted a mallpark of a stadium in Las Vegas, he could have done what every other developer does -- go to a bank and ask for a loan. Not suckle at the taxpayers' teat.
Tony Romo is retiring.
Say what you will about him, but he was a gamer. The guy never stopped.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.