• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

NFL 2016-2017

Vote for which teams you think will be in the Super Bowl. Pick 2.

  • Patriots

    Votes: 6 75.0%
  • Steelers

    Votes: 2 25.0%
  • Packers

    Votes: 4 50.0%
  • Falcons

    Votes: 4 50.0%

  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
As an Oaklander, I can't really blame Mark Davis. It's the smart business decision. The incompetence of the mayor's office and Oakland city council has been a huge problem for years. Decades. When Jerry Brown was the mayor, he tried to get the city council and other Oakland leaders to talk about news stadiums for the A's and Raiders. The council wouldn't even discuss it. Blame the NFL and Davis all you want but this is squarely on the shoulders of Oakland's "leadership."
 
As an Oaklander, I can't really blame Mark Davis. It's the smart business decision. The incompetence of the mayor's office and Oakland city council has been a huge problem for years. Decades. When Jerry Brown was the mayor, he tried to get the city council and other Oakland leaders to talk about news stadiums for the A's and Raiders. The council wouldn't even discuss it. Blame the NFL and Davis all you want but this is squarely on the shoulders of Oakland's "leadership."
It's more the financial ramifications on Las Vegas and their "leadership" decisions.

But, the NFL means money so I'm not surprised. Just very frustrated by it.
 
But, the NFL means money

That's what it likes municipalities to think. But because these public financing deals are generally done through issuance of 20-year bonds, after inflation they generally wind up losing a metric fuckton of money.

Cities should not be in the business of subsidizing private enterprise. If Mark Davis wanted a mallpark of a stadium in Las Vegas, he could have done what every other developer does -- go to a bank and ask for a loan. Not suckle at the taxpayers' teat.
 
That's what it likes municipalities to think. But because these public financing deals are generally done through issuance of 20-year bonds, after inflation they generally wind up losing a metric fuckton of money.

Cities should not be in the business of subsidizing private enterprise. If Mark Davis wanted a mallpark of a stadium in Las Vegas, he could have done what every other developer does -- go to a bank and ask for a loan. Not suckle at the taxpayers' teat.
No argument here.
 
Cities should not be in the business of subsidizing private enterprise. If Mark Davis wanted a mallpark of a stadium in Las Vegas, he could have done what every other developer does -- go to a bank and ask for a loan. Not suckle at the taxpayers' teat.

It is terrible that cities fall for this time after time. But, if I'm Davis (or the NFL/MLB/NBA/NHL/MLS), I'm not going to say no if a city offers me a billion dollars in incentives to come. *Not sure of how stable a long term market Las Vegas will be. But that's another story.

Las Vegas is just the current sucker. Either Oakland/St. Louis/San Diego will be next when they realize they want another NFL team.
 
Oakland looking into ways to force the Raiders out early, hope they find one.

Oakland's on the hook for $13 million a year in debt service on the Coliseum until 2025, not surprised they'd like to boot them. It would save the Coliseum Authority a shit-ton of money each year to not have to convert it back and forth from football to baseball usage and back.
 
Do the Raiders still have to pay till 2025 if Oakland tears the thing down and builds a new baseball park for the A's?
 
Yes, because debt is debt and those 30-year bonds still have to be repaid no matter what.
 
Yes, because debt is debt and those 30-year bonds still have to be repaid no matter what.

Wouldn't it be Oakland on the hook for those bonds since they were the ones who issued them?
 
I think it'll be great to be able to go to Vegas for a weekend and see a game just like you'd see a show.

It'll be a very different dynamic.
 
I think it'll be great to be able to go to Vegas for a weekend and see a game just like you'd see a show.

It'll be a very different dynamic.

Have fun paying a hundred bucks for a parking spot.
 
None? No infrastructure improvements.
Infrastructure costs are nothing close to the near quarter of a billion dollars or more, that cities are typically asked to come up with on order to get an NFL stadium built.
As an Oaklander, I can't really blame Mark Davis. It's the smart business decision. The incompetence of the mayor's office and Oakland city council has been a huge problem for years. Decades. When Jerry Brown was the mayor, he tried to get the city council and other Oakland leaders to talk about news stadiums for the A's and Raiders. The council wouldn't even discuss it. Blame the NFL and Davis all you want but this is squarely on the shoulders of Oakland's "leadership."
I'm sorry for the Oakland fans, but I applaud the city of Oakland for not selling out it's taxpayers to make a billionaire, more of a billionaire.
That's what it likes municipalities to think. But because these public financing deals are generally done through issuance of 20-year bonds, after inflation they generally wind up losing a metric fuckton of money.

Cities should not be in the business of subsidizing private enterprise. If Mark Davis wanted a mallpark of a stadium in Las Vegas, he could have done what every other developer does -- go to a bank and ask for a loan. Not suckle at the taxpayers' teat.
Amen.
 
Tony Romo is retiring.

Say what you will about him, but he was a gamer. The guy never stopped.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top