With a plate in his chest to recharge.And that Spock was originally a Martian.
With a plate in his chest to recharge.And that Spock was originally a Martian.
I was thinking the same thing. I just didn't want to be the first person to say it.I can't explain why exactly, but that looks strangely obscene.
^^^^^
He is/(now probably was) an Extra.
I'm sure once this photo hit Social Media:
STD Producer: "Um, can I speak to you?"
Him: "Sure."
STD Producer: "Do you recall the Non-Disclosure clause in the contract you signed?"
Him: "Ummm...."
STD Producer: "You're fired...breach of contract. Also, if you know what's good for you, you'll try and mitigate the situation if you actually want to work in this town again."
Him: "Got it."
End result: See picture above.
Storytelling is not dependent on the aesthetics in the background. You mean to say one detail of stitching on a uniform will ruin one of the best episodes ever written?
The two have nothing to do with each other, something Trek has had a hard time figuring out during the 90's and early 2000's
Klingon Commander: "FUCK!"Once they get their hairpieces, are lit properly, and start swearing, they'll be Klingons.![]()
"F'UcK: Yes, commander?Klingon Commander: "FUCK!"
Klingon Commander: "FUCK!"
What difference does their style of armor make? How does that negate the "science fiction" setting? Being impractical or dangerous has never done that before.That spiky armor they have looks ridiculous. It has no place in a supposed science fiction setting. Even as a medieval fantasy armor, it looks impractical and dangerous to the wearers themselves and their group mates. Isn't Star Trek described as a science fiction franchise? This does not look the part.
If it is one thing speculative fiction is known for it is practicality. Especially in Star Trek, with no zippers or pockets any where.What difference does their style of armor make? How does that negate the "science fiction" setting? Being impractical or dangerous has never done that before.
HD has forever ruined the idea of no zippers.If it is one thing speculative fiction is known for it is practicality. Especially in Star Trek, with no zippers or pockets any where.
That spiky armor they have looks ridiculous. It has no place in a supposed science fiction setting. Even as a medieval fantasy armor, it looks impractical and dangerous to the wearers themselves and their group mates. Isn't Star Trek described as a science fiction franchise? This does not look the part.
The only issue I have with the armor is that it's a bit too similar to Hirogen armor. But I love how it looks like it would be dangerous just to touch. For too long the Klingons have been like the sword guy in Raiders. They make a lot of noise, try to look threatening with their swords, but they're kind of useless as opponents. Hopefully DSC will change that.That spiky armor they have looks ridiculous. It has no place in a supposed science fiction setting. Even as a medieval fantasy armor, it looks impractical and dangerous to the wearers themselves and their group mates. Isn't Star Trek described as a science fiction franchise? This does not look the part.
If you speak with the actors who played Klingons in the TNG era armour, they found that very impractical and dangerous - JG Hertzler says he used to send crewmembers flying if he turned around too fast, especially after he went down to one eye.They're (apparently) Klingons. A race that, for the last thirty years anyway, has been written as taking pride in being impractical and dangerous.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.