enterprise ended star trek as we know of it. What we have now is simply a re imagining of it. and thus has no real impact on ourselves.
It has exactly the same impact it always did - it's enjoyable fiction.
enterprise ended star trek as we know of it. What we have now is simply a re imagining of it. and thus has no real impact on ourselves.
The occasional nod would be fine. Actually, the biggest nod of having Greenwood appear as Pike would be cool. Although, not sure that the ages line up correctly. Greenwood is 60 and Hunter was about 38 when he appeared. Oh well.Being as the Kelvin timeline keeps making all those cool little nods towards all of the Trek series, I can't help but feel Discovery may get the same treatment. And that would do for me, being as they're separate timelines.
I'm afraid there will never be a narrative convergence as I see it due to legal issues. The Kelvin timeline exists to allow two corporations access to one franchise. Discovery could have aired much sooner if it wasn't for complex legal agreements keeping the corporations and their versions separate and without further legal action.Assuming there is a successful fourth movie after Beyond and that the new TV show is a success, at what point does the new movie franchise converge with the new TV show? Granted, I know this is a lot to assume, and I'm hoping mostly that the movies and TV shows are independently successful, but at what point does the tension between the alternate universe and the "Prime" universe become something that is explicitly addressed?
Discovery will dodge the bullet mostly because it's set pre-TOS and won't step on anyone's toes too much, but Prime universe prequels set in Garrett-era Trek would face a host of difficulties, not least of which are the red uniforms and overall aesthetic. Sure, you can make updates and changes, but at some level certain parts of Trek are more fixed than others.
I understand the animosity to new Trek, but perhaps there should be some kind of narrative convergence after the next movie, a way to integrate the new movie timeline into future Trek TV without destroying everything that has come before and leaving the door open for a new potential future that takes the best of both.
Fuller mentioned that Discovery could have been set within either continuity:I'm afraid there will never be a narrative convergence as I see it due to legal issues. The Kelvin timeline exists to allow two corporations access to one franchise. Discovery could have aired much sooner if it wasn't for complex legal agreements keeping the corporations and their versions separate and without further legal action.
Fuller mentioned that Discovery could have been set within either continuity:
Really, when we developed this story, it could take place in either Prime or the Kelvin [timeline] – the timeline was relatively inconsequential, but there was the cleanliness of keeping our series independent of the [Abrams] films. That way, we don’t have to track anything they’re doing; they don’t have to track anything we’re doing – and you can have two distinct universes.
If it was considered, then Kelvin/Prime crossovers can't be as unimaginable as some think (it's already happened in IDW's comics and the Star Trek Online videogame). Source.
“Really when we developed the story it could take place in either Prime or Kelvin so the timeline was relatively inconsequential,” he explained. “But there was the cleanliness of keeping our series independent of the films. That way we don’t have to track anything and they don’t have to track what we’re doing.
...Jar Jar Abrams...
Just a long, long, time OG Trekkie who took offense at Mr. Abrams creative (destructive) endeavors.With your originality, you should go to Hollywood! Great things are waiting for you there!
Sigh, this again.Just a long, long, time OG Trekkie who took offense at Mr. Abrams creative (destructive) endeavors.
Just a long, long, time OG Trekkie who took offense at Mr. Abrams creative (destructive) endeavors.
Good for you. I personally don't even consider them Star Trek (they seem more like Transformer movies to me). My earliest memories are of watching TOS as it aired. I went to my first convention in 1977.But name calling serves no purpose. I gotta be honest, I much prefer what Abrams did with the franchise vs. what Berman and company did. Been watching since 1975.
Well I went to school with Gene Roddenberry and introduced him to Majel! AND I'm best buds with Dorothy Fontana. So ha! How bout that! My creds are the best creds so I win.Good for you. I personally don't even consider them Star Trek (they seem more like Transformer movies to me). My earliest memories are of watching TOS as it aired. I went to my first convention in 1977.
I personally don't even consider them Star Trek (they seem more like Transformer movies to me).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.