• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Discovery's uniform insignia...combadge?

I want the crew to be drunk all the time. Whenever they open a channel to another starfleet vessel they are greeted with rolleyes and facepalms.
 
Yeah. Brain wiggled. You would think I would know that having worn the tng uniform with that badge a time or three. Sigh. Tá.
Yeah well, they were in the process of introducing a new uniform, but it got scrapped at the last minute; they kept the original TNG uniform and as we saw, gave some of the actors the DS9 costumes. I can't recall why the shifted. Only the combadges were kept at the end.
 
Star Trek isn't about technology, so I'm unclear why people are getting hung up on that anyway.

Exactly. Roddenberry's original pitch for the Trek concept specifically said as follows (partially bolded by me for emphasis):
Star Trek is... said:
The time is "Somewhere in the future." It could be 1995 or maybe even 2995. In other words, close enough to our own time for our continuing characters to be fully identifiable as people like us, but far enough into the future for galaxy travel to be thoroughly established (happily eliminating the need to encumber our stories with tiresome scientific explanation).

That's what Star Trek means to me. IMO, certain later Trek productions struck out on both counts, with sanctimonious, perfect characters that can't be related to as real human beings, and too much focus on imaginary technology and reliance on nonsensical technobabble gibberish to get out of the predicament of the week.

Kor
 
Yeah well, they were in the process of introducing a new uniform, but it got scrapped at the last minute; they kept the original TNG uniform and as we saw, gave some of the actors the DS9 costumes. I can't recall why the shifted. Only the combadges were kept at the end.

They had made the action figures too. Only shot the deleted Geordi torture scene with them, and I think basically they just decided they were too different, especially placed in a familiar from TV setting, and would have had a knock on for the upcoming Voyager as well as on Ds9. Brand awareness was different to the TOS movie era.
 
Exactly. Roddenberry's original pitch for the Trek concept specifically said as follows (partially bolded by me for emphasis):


That's what Star Trek means to me. IMO, certain later Trek productions struck out on both counts, with sanctimonious, perfect characters that can't be related to as real human beings, and too much focus on imaginary technology and reliance on nonsensical technobabble gibberish to get out of the predicament of the week.

Kor

So....what you are saying is Trek moved to California?
 
I know allot of people would have preferred a new show set in the 25th century.
In an interview, when talking about ENT, Rick Berman said that a TV exec wanted to have the next Trek show(back in 2001) set in the 25th century, to which Rick answered "What would that mean? Tighter uniforms and smaller tricorders?" As in, it would just be more of the same old same old.
 
In an interview, when talking about ENT, Rick Berman said that a TV exec wanted to have the next Trek show(back in 2001) set in the 25th century, to which Rick answered "What would that mean? Tighter uniforms and smaller tricorders?" As in, it would just be more of the same old same old.

If so, figures. The tighter uniforms bit is hella funny.
 
In an interview, when talking about ENT, Rick Berman said that a TV exec wanted to have the next Trek show(back in 2001) set in the 25th century, to which Rick answered "What would that mean? Tighter uniforms and smaller tricorders?" As in, it would just be more of the same old same old.

Exactly so.

It's not all that likely that we'll see stuff outside of the 23rd century again, except maybe in brief glimpses.
 
In an interview, when talking about ENT, Rick Berman said that a TV exec wanted to have the next Trek show(back in 2001) set in the 25th century, to which Rick answered "What would that mean? Tighter uniforms and smaller tricorders?" As in, it would just be more of the same old same old.

Didn't we get tighter uniforms and smaller Tricorders in Enterprise anyway?
25th century is no harder to do than the 24th was going from the 23rd.
 
Didn't we get tighter uniforms and smaller Tricorders in Enterprise anyway?
25th century is no harder to do than the 24th was going from the 23rd.

That; we did. Yeah, I believe so, cause really who knows how the 25th century is like. It's as much speculation as the 22nd, or 23rd or 24th or 29th, 31st, etc, what we've seen so far. And even events like mid and late 21st century that are even closer to us. Besides it's a scifi show, just make the best prediction on stuff that you can and then focus on the storytelling.
 
Didn't we get tighter uniforms and smaller Tricorders in Enterprise anyway?
25th century is no harder to do than the 24th was going from the 23rd.
They switched from the Motorola '86 Brick version in TNG to late 90's popout version in ENT. That, and Vulcans find tight fitting uniforms to be logical. Oh, and 31st century timecops share in this logic.

I think in a producer's mind ENT has potential vs a 25th century series as it's both a sequel to First Contact and a Prequel to the rest of the shows.

The "First Contact" part of First Contact was an interesting story that imo deserved to be expanded upon.

Oops, I forgot. 22nd century Suliban-Temporal-Renegade-Genetically-Enhanced-Mercenaries also find a snug 'fit logical. So do 22nd century Andorians.

So do 20th century human 22nd century Augments. Except they like to cut lots and lots of strips out of their clothes to express themselves.
 
if this is set 10 years before TOS why the hell would they use combadges? I'm interested to see what the communicators look like.
 
Didn't we get tighter uniforms and smaller Tricorders in Enterprise anyway?

I don't think the uniforms were tighter, but we got a lot more topless/underwear scenes.

The temperature was also apparently dropped significantly whenever a female was in a tight top.
 
I don't think the uniforms were tighter, but we got a lot more topless/underwear scenes.

The temperature was also apparently dropped significantly whenever a female was in a tight top.

That may have been genetics. That or my family are part Vulcan.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top