In the middle of watching the 1966 Batman movie; @Christopher , refresh my memory--Did you ever do a review as part of your review of the series here?
In the middle of watching the 1966 Batman movie; @Christopher , refresh my memory--Did you ever do a review as part of your review of the series here?
Lots of people have covered wider expanses of ocean in comparably small craft, like the ancient Polynesians..
Looks like my affiliate pre-empted Kolchak too, but fortunately I already binge-watched it on Netflix last month. So I'll post my thoughts here for the benefit of anyone who's interested.
Anyway… Simon Oakland would’ve made a really good live-action Fred Flintstone, wouldn’t he?
Yes he did, because if McGee came around asking Cassidy questions, and Cassidy not only denied having ever met him, but told McGee that he had a lookalike who'd been in town recently...David's cover would be blown, McGee would know that the man he encountered was indeed a surviving David Banner.
Batman [The Movie]
Released July 30, 1966
Joker is definitely having a bad mustache day in cinematic quality. And between Catwoman's role in the film, all of the Penguin gimmickry, and so many riddles, Romero Joker's less distinctive motif gets him lost in the shuffle somewhat, relegated to firing torpedoes on command like a henchman. And performance-wise, he comes off as a straight man next to Gorshin's Riddler...an unbecoming role for the Joker to find himself in.
This installment gave us some of the most memorable bits of business from the West version of the Caped Crusader....
They show Bruce hitting the costume change lever on his way down the Batpole at multiple points in the film, so we know that however it works, it's a manually triggered mechanism. And isn't this the first time we see the Batpoles' steam lift?
So Robin isn't allowed to drive the Batmobile but he can fly the Batcopter? Granted it seemed to be partly automated, but he was definitely manning the controls per Batman's instructions.
For all of TV Batman's respect for (often inept) law enforcement, the film isn't terribly flattering to the military in that scene of the Caped Crusader calling the admiral.
And Bruce's fighting skills should draw a lot of suspicion to him...maybe it's the lack of visible sound effects that fools the bad guys.
The whole dehydrator gimmick isn't only absurd, it's rather disturbing if given a moment's serious thought. How can they reconstitute the thugs when they have to use such crude means as sweeping their dusty remains off of a carpet, especially with Catwoman spilling them all over the place when pouring them into the vials? Why even have an option for heavy water to come out of what's supposed to be a drinking water dispenser? And of course, none of the depicted water containers have nearly enough capacity on display to account for so much body mass.
"Quickly, via Batcycle to the Batcopter." Do they always have the Batcycle sitting there camouflaged by the road? If not, when did they have a chance to plant it? As a detour while they were taking the Bat-Gassed Penguin to the Batcave?
And the voice of LBJ is none other than the recently departed Van Williams, a.k.a. the Green Hornet.
So Robin isn't allowed to drive the Batmobile but he can fly the Batcopter?
The Catwoman's secret identity--Maybe she's harder to recognize when she's not doing that weird thing with her eyebrows?
There was certainly a relationship between Punk and New Wave, but New Wave was more than a commercial rebranding. Punk took perverse pride in its own crudeness, both in terms of theme and aesthetics, whereas New Wave was far more sophisticated lyrically and far more experimental musically (and not just in terms of synthesizers). I feel that New Wave has more in common with Psychedelic Rock than Punk myself.New wave was an outgrowth of the punk scene...a record industry re-branding of the more commercial elements of punk because more notorious / badly behaving acts like the Sex Pistols had given punk a bad name in the entertainment business.
It's been a long time since we've seen traditional Zombies. Not that I don't like the Romero variety, but the Zombie Apocalypse has worn out its welcome big time-- I think most kids today don't even know what a "real" Zombie is.Tonight we actually see what a zombie is supposed to be--not a flesh-eating ghoul--but a worker...a golem.
There was certainly a relationship between Punk and New Wave, but New Wave was more than a commercial rebranding. Punk took perverse pride in its own crudeness, both in terms of theme and aesthetics, whereas New Wave was far more sophisticated lyrically and far more experimental musically (and not just in terms of synthesizers). I feel that New Wave has more in common with Psychedelic Rock than Punk myself.
However unlikely it is that Bruce Wayne has one, atomic reactors are a real thing. The dehydration technology doesn't exist, and even if it did, rehydration into a living, thinking being require massive suspension of disbelief...all the more so when it's highly unlikely that you'd manage to keep all of the person's dust together. Now if it changed people into little blocks shaped like RPG dice...that would be a bit easier to swallow.If anyone can accept a rich guy with an active atomic reactor under his mansion (never mind how he obtained all it takes to construct a reactor), the entire dehydration technology should be accepted.
It's all in the first video that I posted. Robin mans the controls, and Batman gives him orders like "increase sink rate" and "take her up"...seems like he was piloting it. OTOH, Robin leaves the cockpit to go down the ladder, so there's some auto-pilot in play there.Anyway, he was just holding it steady, wasn't he?
However unlikely it is that Bruce Wayne has one, atomic reactors are a real thing.
The rebranding was successful...that's why that style was split off and renamed. The early new wave artists came from the punk scene and were considered punk acts at the time, before the new genre was named. I think that part of the problem is that the term "new wave" continued to get slapped on acts that came around too late, relatively speaking, to be considered part of a genre that had "new" in its name. In my own collection, such bands that come around 1982-ish and later tend to get labeled "synthpop" to distinguish them from the acts that were called "new wave" when it was actually something new.There was certainly a relationship between Punk and New Wave, but New Wave was more than a commercial rebranding. Punk took perverse pride in its own crudeness, both in terms of theme and aesthetics, whereas New Wave was far more sophisticated lyrically and far more experimental musically (and not just in terms of synthesizers). I feel that New Wave has more in common with Psychedelic Rock than Punk myself.
For a period of time in 1976 and 1977, the terms new wave and punk were somewhat interchangeable. By the end of 1977, "new wave" had replaced "punk" as the definition for new underground music in the UK.
In the United States, Sire Records chairman Seymour Stein, believing that the term "punk" would mean poor sales for Sire's acts who had frequently played the club CBGB, launched a "Don't Call It Punk" campaign designed to replace the term with "new wave". As radio consultants in the United States had advised their clients that punk rock was a fad, they settled on the term "new wave". Like the filmmakers of the French new wave movement (after whom the genre was named), its new artists were anti-corporate and experimental (e.g. Ramones and Talking Heads). At first, most U.S. writers exclusively used the term "new wave" for British punk acts. Starting in December 1976, The New York Rocker, which was suspicious of the term "punk", became the first American journal enthusiastically used the term starting with British acts, later appropriating it to acts associated with the CBGB scene.
Music historian Vernon Joynson claimed that new wave emerged in the UK in late 1976, when many bands began disassociating themselves from punk. Music that followed the anarchic garage band ethos of the Sex Pistols was distinguished as "punk", while music that tended toward experimentation, lyrical complexity or more polished production, came to be categorized as "new wave". In the U.S., the first new wavers were the not-so-punk acts associated with the New York club CBGB (e.g. Talking Heads, Mink DeVille and Blondie).
New wave is much more closely tied to punk and came and went more quickly in the United Kingdom than in the United States. At the time punk began, it was a major phenomenon in the United Kingdom and a minor one in the United States. Thus when new wave acts started getting noticed in America, punk meant little to the mainstream audience
Probably the same people who call Led Zeppelin Heavy Metal. I don't really see The Who as an influence on Punk. The Troggs, maybe.Funny thing about the merits of punk: while several punk groups (and certain "journalists") often referred to The Who as a central influence, you could count on half of one hand the number coming within a country mile of Townshend's gifts as a songwriter.
I'd find those blocks very hard to swallow.Now if it changed people into little blocks shaped like RPG dice...that would be a bit easier to swallow.
Eh, "new" and "modern" are words that tend to get applied and stick long past their shelf life (19th-century Feminists are still called the New Woman and the Modern Lovers aren't so modern anymore). I think the early New Wave crowd was associated with Punk because there was no place else for them to be, because, aside from being new, they really didn't have much in common. As the quote says, Punk was more from the Garage Band scene whereas New Wave had the elements of experimentation and complexity that I mentioned. I kind of see them as diametrically opposed, myself.The rebranding was successful...that's why that style was split off and renamed. The early new wave artists came from the punk scene and were considered punk acts at the time, before the new genre was named. I think that part of the problem is that the term "new wave" continued to get slapped on acts that came around too late, relatively speaking, to be considered part of a genre that had "new" in its name. In my own collection, such bands that come around 1982-ish and later tend to get labeled "synthpop" to distinguish them from the acts that were called "new wave" when it was actually something new.
However unlikely it is that Bruce Wayne has one, atomic reactors are a real thing. The dehydration technology doesn't exist, and even if it did, rehydration into a living, thinking being require massive suspension of disbelief...all the more so when it's highly unlikely that you'd manage to keep all of the person's dust together. Now if it changed people into little blocks shaped like RPG dice...that would be a bit easier to swallow.
Oh, sure, it evolved as new artists picked up on the traits and tropes the genre-- just like Elvis Presley and the Bruce Springsteen are both Rock'n'Roll. Then there was Folk Rock, Art Rock, Glam Rock....^ I see what you're saying, but as far as applying the label to later artists goes...I find that there's a blurry threshold somewhere around '82 where the new synthpop acts feel less like part of the new wave that had come before and more derivative of it.
With newspaper the National Register under a new publisher, pressure is put on Jack McGee to prove that the Hulk is real.
January 6
January 9 – In Saudi Arabia, 63 Islamist insurgents are beheaded for their part in the siege of the Great Mosque in Mecca in November, 1979.
- Global Positioning System time epoch begins at 00:00 UTC.
- The president of Sicily, Piersanti Mattarella, is killed by the Mafia.
January 11 – Nigel Short, 14, becomes the youngest chess player to be awarded the degree of International Master.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.