Vulture Marvel Legends

But Tony Stark is Iron Man. In or out the suit doesn't matter for him.I was actually hoping that Stark would only show up as himself, rather than suiting up as Iron Man.
I was actually hoping that Stark would only show up as himself, rather than suiting up as Iron Man.
That's what I'm hoping for, too, but I wouldn't be surprised if there's some kind of team-up actin in the third act.I wonder if that's actually the very end of the movie, after Peter's defeated the Vulture. Like Spidey and Iron-Man talk about what just happened, then they fly/swing off together to tackle a new problem.
The casual wisecracking is my favorite part but I agree this is very refreshing to see and I would love to see more of this for Spider-Man. That's always been one of the core tenets of Spider-Man: Helping people.My favorite part is the cruise ship rescue scene at the end. I get more of a thrill out of seeing superheroes as rescuers than as fighters, and Spidey having to achieve an impossible feat of strength to save people is one of his classic moves.
I wanted to like this trailer, but I'm just not feeling this take on the character right now. Maybe it's all the extraneous stuff that defined the way this movie came into existence or the fact that I'm largely burnt out on the MCU right now, but, at this point, the only reason I have to go see this thing is an enduring love for the character of Spider-Man in general, which saddens me greatly.
Yeah, I'm not a fan of the "new" character at all for many of the same reasons you cited. But you know what? I loved everything else about the trailer, and that love greatly overshadows that one nitpick of mine. I'm so glad Marvel got to get their hands on the character and hopefully they show the other studios that people actually want to see the real characters more than the completely "reimagined, angsty, emo" crap they churn out. Fantastic Four and X-Men, I'm looking at you in particular.I really liked this trailer, especially the casual wisecracking that was better than both Civil War and the Garfield films.
However, I didn't like the brand new character as Peter's confidante who knows his secret. One of the core aspects of the character early on is that he had to carry the Spider-Man burden on his own.
Yes, technically the character is Ned Leeds, but this character only resembles Leeds in name only (and apparently physically looks like a Morales character, but I don't know anything about that series).
Yes, Tony also knows his secret, but having someone his age knowing about Spider-Man is very different from someone who is literally bankrolling it.
Maybe I'm continuing to be an admittedly stubborn and ardent Spidey purist, but while I loved most of the trailer and what Tom Holland has done so far, this part really bothers me.
Yeah, you're right and that's why I'm trying to go into the film optimistically, even if I did get burned the last five times. Honestly, naming the character "Ned Leeds" is probably going to bug me more than the character itself.Yeah, I'm not a fan of the "new" character at all for many of the same reasons you cited. But you know what? I loved everything else about the trailer, and that love greatly overshadows that one nitpick of mine. I'm so glad Marvel got to get their hands on the character and hopefully they show the other studios that people actually want to see the real characters more than the completely "reimagined, angsty, emo" crap they churn out. Fantastic Four and X-Men, I'm looking at you in particular.
I wonder if that's actually the very end of the movie, after Peter's defeated the Vulture. Like Spidey and Iron-Man talk about what just happened, then they fly/swing off together to tackle a new problem.
That's what I'm hoping for, too, but I wouldn't be surprised if there's some kind of team-up act in in the third act.
want to see the real characters more than the completely "reimagined, angsty, emo" crap they churn out. Fantastic Four and X-Men, I'm looking at you in particular.
Part of the problem is that the "classic" Peter Parker story has been told *twice* in recent memory, so they need to be wary of repeating what's already been done. Hence skipping over the origin (though I'd be surprised if there isn't some kind of brief flash-back) hence a younger Aunt May, hence filching some of Miles Morales's supporting cast and setup. That last bit is a bit dicey since once again, we have another PoC character essentially replaced with a white version.Maybe I'm continuing to be an admittedly stubborn and ardent Spidey purist, but while I loved most of the trailer and what Tom Holland has done so far, this part really bothers me.
Uh, yeah, no. Spider-Man has always had his angst, starting off as a teen an all, but it's not a defining aspect of the character, nor is he anything like what we've seen Sony and Warner Bros churn out for everyone they have the misfortune of having the rights to, where they're all trying to make every superhero into Batman, who is -the- definitive angsty/emo superhero.Hate to break it to you, but Spider-Man is the original "angsty / emo" superhero. The X-Men built an entire comic book empire on "angst / emo". Sorry, but that's a core element of these characters and always has been.
No, I missed them. What were they?Anyone else spot the Howard Stark & Bruce Banner cameos? I thought that was very cute.
Yeah, I get all of that. Which is precisely why I would've preferred not covering high school or college at all. But I also understand why they went with that route because an older, mature Spidey wouldn't fit in the MCU because he was never seen before and having Peter get his powers later in life goes against the core origin even more so. In a way, the writers were stuck between a rock and a hard place because they were introducing Spider-Man so late into the MCU timeline.Part of the problem is that the "classic" Peter Parker story has been told *twice* in recent memory, so they need to be wary of repeating what's already been done. Hence skipping over the origin (though I'd be surprised if there isn't some kind of brief flash-back) hence a younger Aunt May, hence filching some of Miles Morales's supporting cast and setup. That last bit is a bit dicey since once again, we have another PoC character essentially replaced with a white version.
It's not just Ganke Lee they're borrowing but Mile's school as well. IIRC in the comics Peter was always a public school kid (what the Ynaks call public school anyway; that means something very different over here) while Miles goes to a charter school (which I am given to understand is something like our grammar schools) which is exactly what the school in the trailer appears to be
My guess is he's just going to tell Ned how he got his powers, and that'll be about it. It's really the only reason to include the character, since he's already been introduced as a fully-realized superhero when we first meet him... and Marvel isn't in the habit of jumping back in time to tell the stories in their shared universe.Part of the problem is that the "classic" Peter Parker story has been told *twice* in recent memory, so they need to be wary of repeating what's already been done. Hence skipping over the origin (though I'd be surprised if there isn't some kind of brief flash-back) hence a younger Aunt May, hence filching some of Miles Morales's supporting cast and setup. That last bit is a bit dicey since once again, we have another PoC character essentially replaced with a white version.
Ah, thanks for pointing that. I actually looked at the mural and didn't notice Stark.The Banner and Howard Stark Easter eggs, and others, can be seen here. What a lot of people have missed is that Abraham Erskine is a part of the same mural that Stark is in (although he can't be seen in this article's pic. Below Stark to the right).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.