Lauren's southern accent is nails on a chalk board bad.
Do white actors from other countries playing Americans, raise any alarms? If not, then, Jax's actor's in the same boat as them...
![]()
Not really the point.Lauren's southern accent is nails on a chalk board bad.
That's not the same thing. Not even close.I'm recalling the recent stink about the casting of Exodus of Kings where an Australian was cast as the King of Egypt and Christian Bale was Moses... But the movie turned out to be a bomb, so maybe the world knows better now?
I found that to be a surprisingly good and interesting episode. Out of the whole Arrowverse, how come the two most campy shows that usually indulge most in the ridiculous and silly, happen to have episodes that go utterly serious and want to smack you into the reality? That includes the alien bar on Supergirl last weeks.
I'm not the right person to comment on the depiction of slavery, but it was bizarre how severed heads and bodies incinerated in a de jure suicide bombing were OK to show, but we looked away the moment nasty sides of history were to be seen. I'm not saying it's wrong – a fake roasted zombie does far less to me emotionally than the mere thought of the real human suffering that happened off-camera, so it makes sense.
P.S. Have only seen half of Season 1 so far, so if that's not the first mid-19th century America episode, my bad. But given Jax's attitude, I'd be surprised if it wasn't.
By the way, I'm glad that General Grant didn't understand the term "zombie," but Nate wasn't telling the whole story by saying Americans wouldn't know about it for 70 years. Yes, the concept was popularized in the US starting with a 1929 book and zombie movies in the 1930s, but they were based on a more accurate use of the term "zombie," referring to the Caribbean/West African belief in the walking dead as entranced slaves of a vodoun priest. The modern "Romero zombies," decaying hordes spreading an infection and threatening a worldwide apocalypse, didn't emerge until 1968 and wasn't actually called that until years later (Romero based Night of the Living Dead loosely on Richard Matheson's vampire novel I Am Legend and called his creatures "ghouls"). And the trope of zombies eating brains didn't originate until 1985. It's surprising to me how young modern zombie lore is, and how quickly it's come to be seen as definitive. (But then, the idea of vampires burning up in sunlight only dates from 1920s film and the idea of the full moon transforming werewolves dates from a 1940s film, and those became definitive pretty quickly too.)
I thought he was oddly specific there, after dropping his second reference to two centuries / 200 years for something that was really more like 150. (Though it's debatable when he considers gender equality to have started...presumably by his own time.)but Nate wasn't telling the whole story by saying Americans wouldn't know about it for 70 years
Also, did anybody besides me get the feeling that we might've met one of Amaya and Mari's ancestors during this episode in the form of that female slave who recognized Amaya's amulet?
Amaya is first generation from Africa, so it could be a relative, but not an ancestor.we might've met one of Amaya and Mari's ancestors
^ I don't know how or why, but I missed her saying she came straight to America from Africa as a "first generation immigrant".
If the show followed the rules of the first season shouldn't Mari already Ben erased from exstence? When the Legends went into the future they saw a timeline in which they did disappeared after 2016 when they left with Rip. Would traveling in time create a new timeline in which Amaya disappeared after she left 1942? Obviously they could restore things when she returns to her time.
I have no idea if they are applying that approach to Amaya at at all. It is interesting that so far none of the Legends have mentioned Mari. In the webseries we know at least Ray has met her. It makes sense that he would not disclose what he knows to her about her own future. But it's surprising that he has not discussed his knowledge of her family with the others. Maybe that is still coming.
If the show followed the rules of the first season
I saw a viewer suggest on Facebook that Cisco unknowingly Vibed that her name should be Vixen. Of course that would had to been before he even knew he had those powers. So I am not completely convinced that is a satisfying fix for that inconsistency.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.