• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Bryan Fuller Stepping Back From Showrunner Role on ‘Star Trek: Discovery’

Akiva G. worked on such gems as I am Legend, Angels & Demons, 90s Lost in Space, and let's not forget

Batman-and-Robin-Batgirl-Team-Up.jpg
I'm slightly familiar with Goldsman. I was talking more about the other two.
 
Oh boy.

If that really is true... siiiiiiiiigh...

This would contradict a lot of the things said in the official press release.

Star Trek is a franchise that makes a lot of money for CBS. They were never going to let Fuller color too far outside the lines. That was one of my concerns when Discovery was announced. That it would be more of safe, tepid 90's Trek.
 
The editor of Collider.com tweeted that Fuller was "pushed out" because of what he wanted to do (creative choices/direction?)...

https://twitter.com/colliderfrosty/status/791414869488578561

my biggest concern about @BryanFuller leaving new STAR TREK show is he was pushed out for what he wanted to do.

That just... hmmm...

While it's not impossible - I'm a little sceptical about that one. Why push someone out because of his ideas only to assign two people who would do what he wanted anyway?
 
The show will do fine. Oh, and none of the characters or storylines that socially regressive fans find uncomfortable are going back into the box because of Fuller stepping back to EP status.

I hope you're right. But I'm not so sure.
 
Given Fuller made it clear from day one that he wanted to make Discovery solely for the special snowflake brigade, perhaps, after the gay Sulu debacle and subsequent tanking of Beyond, CBS have seen sense. Although, that said, I have no faith in CBS to deliver quality product when it comes to Star Trek, especially given how it's allowed the 50th anniversary to disappear as if it never existed.
Infraction for trolling. Comments to PM. You've already been warned for making off-topic homophobic and insulting remarks before, so you should know better at this point. You seem to have a singular interest, almost a "gay agenda" if I can borrow one of your terms, and seem to want to discuss nothing else but that. If you can't handle a little real life-reflection of diversity in TV and in film, then I don't think someone so delicate is really qualified to be judging anyone else for supposedly being "special snowflakes."
 
Last edited:
Totally agreed. And how a show that is behind schedule and now the show runner has been booted (sorry decided to step back) for lack of delivery that someone will think that means we'll get MORE output is positively baffling.
The point being... Fuller obviously has a lot on his plate. I think that's one reason he wanted to limit future seasons to only 10 episodes. If they bring in someone else who can devote more time to the series, then maybe we can see 13 to 15 episodes per season. I also think it's a myth to believe you can't get high quality episodes if there are more than 12 per season. If they find the right people it can be done.

I think CBS got tired of Fuller's delays and realized they need someone who can devote more time to this series, so I see that as a good thing in the long run.
 
Star Trek is a franchise that makes a lot of money for CBS. They were never going to let Fuller color too far outside the lines. That was one of my concerns when Discovery was announced. That it would be more of safe, tepid 90's Trek.
I don't think it's gotten that bad yet. The showrunners in charge of this are still very closely tied to Fuller, they were his handpicked co-showrunners (and now successors) from the beginning when he brought them on board. Not to mention Nicholas Meyer who's known for going against the "safe, tepid" way. I'll get really worried when the other writers start dropping dead.

Goldsman isn't exactly Bryan Fuller, just look at his credits, but some have mentioned his work on Fringe as something to be positive about and I love his enthusiasm for the franchise in his StarTrek.com interview.

Regardless, one's knowledge of the canon of a fictional universe doesn't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy business if you can't write a good script. It's sad we won't get Bryan Fuller's Star Trek, you'll know no one more disappointed than me, but this creative team they have right now ain't the worst either. Inferior? Maybe. But certainly not the type you'd see doing '90s Trek.

I just hope that rumour is not true. Yes, Star Trek makes a lot of money for CBS, but I'd like to think they understand you have to be bold and inventive with the property for it to succeed. Especially on a streaming platform. CBS allegedly going against his "creative vision" really doesn't make them look the bold and inventive type, if their network shows didn't already.
 
Last edited:
Read the article:



I think it was just bad timing with American Gods wrapping shooting and production soon. That's when the heavy workload comes.

I don't think it's a creative fallout where he's leaving the show permanently, he'll still be heavily involved. There's a good chance he could be back next season as showrunner if they manage to work out the schedules and such with American Gods.
And, not to say this would happen, but if American Gods were cancelled...
 
The editor of Collider.com tweeted that Fuller was "pushed out" because of what he wanted to do (creative choices/direction?)...

https://twitter.com/colliderfrosty/status/791414869488578561

my biggest concern about @BryanFuller leaving new STAR TREK show is he was pushed out for what he wanted to do.

Well, the article that Collider actually ran on this doesn't contain a whiff of that:

Berg and Harberts both worked with Fuller on Pushing Dasies so he’s not being replaced by outsiders, and it’s nice to know that he’s remaining an executive producer going forward. Between post-production on American Gods and prep work for Amazing Stories, it sounds like CBS was simply concerned he was dividing his focus too much, and with $6-7 million per episode on the line, the network wasn’t crazy about taking its chances.

Given that these folks are at least play-acting at being journalists, if they're not willing to put their rumor-mongering into their site's "reporting" then fuck their Twitters.
 
The real question to ask here is why has Fuller chosen to prioritise two, here today, gone tomorrow, TV shows (American Gods & Amazing Stories) over a franchise he's been telling us all for years on end he would love to be in charge of, so he could deliver his "dream" show?

It's hard to respect someone as much when they pull a stunt like this on you.
 
The real question to ask here is why has Fuller chosen to prioritise two, here today, gone tomorrow, TV shows (American Gods & Amazing Stories) over a franchise he's been telling us all for years on end he would love to be in charge of, so he could deliver his "dream" show?

It's hard to respect someone as much when they pull a stunt like this on you.
the only Amazing Stories I saw was the Kevin Costner WW2 cartoon plane one.. (directed by Spielberg I think)
 
The real question to ask here is why has Fuller chosen to prioritise two, here today, gone tomorrow, TV shows (American Gods & Amazing Stories) over a franchise he's been telling us all for years on end he would love to be in charge of, so he could deliver his "dream" show?

Maybe he couldn't do his dream show. So, rather than compromising his vision, he decided to back away.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top