• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Change an element of an episode

That was a terrible episode. I don't think that there is any one thing that could have saved it.

I agree. That episode was as subtle as a 16 pound sledgehammer knocking on a flimsy door. Let's just say that the DVD that contains that episode doesn't get watched very much in my house.
 
While watching "The Way To Eden", I was sure Chekov would catch synthococcus novae. Instead, he just gets burned by acid. The superbug storyline would have been interesting.

I did like the way it gave Chekov a bit of a backstory, though. And far from making him a stick in the mud, it shows him as someone who wants to do the right thing and serve in Starfleet, who just isn't the same free spirit as Irina. It also fits with his fear of disobeying orders from "And the Children Shall Lead". Other episodes have him being silly in love like a boy, but he's just a complex character. That's all I get from that.
 
When Fisher beams up to the Enterprise in The Enemy Within and Scotty notices the magnetic dust on his uniform has caused the transporter to malfunction, I would change his line:
Scotty: "Since this magnetic dust is giving the transporter trouble, we'll follow Starfleet regulations and retrieve our landing party via shuttle. We'll resume using the transporter once it's been successfully tested."
Fisher: "Yes, it would be irresponsible to roll the dice and beam the Captain through a buggy transporter pad, especially since we have the much safer shuttle option."
Scotty: "We would be fools to chance it. Scott to shuttle bay, prepare to collect the landing party."
Theme music. Roll credits. (I would say go on to the next episode from there, but it's Mudd's Women.)
 
Because at the time, Shatner was a damn fine SERIOUS actor. The next time its on TCM, watch "The Brothers Karamazov". In it, he more than holds his own against serious actors like Lee J Cobb and Yul Brynner. He is absolutely brilliant in 90% of the first season, and in a good deal of the second. In the latter part of the second, and all through the third, he starts having to deal with not only lesser scripts, but also shorter production times, lesser directors (no Pevney and Daniels), and increasing fatigue.
Enemy Within? It's one of his best! The negative Kirk is SUPPOSED to be totally out of control, almost animalistic. Shatner absolutely has a talent for that sort of thing, and exploits it for its worth. While at the same time, as the so-called 'positive' Kirk, you can see him all through the show, with his words and actions, a man searching within himself for something thats not quite there, all while trying to deal with a crisis. He also manages to have subtle moments as Kirk(-) - the scene in sickbay when Kirk (+) takes his hand and manages to strengthen both of them. Kirk(-) gives a grateful smile, but you can also see the scheming thoughts he's having. The best one is the one near the end where, after knocking out Kirk(+), and going to the bridge, he encounters Rand, apologizes to her, telling (real) story, then making a dinner date with her. He goes to the effect of 'meet you at 8' enters the lift, and just as the doors close, makes a SUBTLE, evil leer. Chilling! (The original script, btw, had him pounding the lift walls in triumph - they wisely cut that out.)

I agree. Watch Shatner's facial expressions in particular. It was the reason why there were so many closeups of him in Season one. So many subtle expressions. He is transmitting A LOT of information with that handsome mug.

:)Spockboy
 
I agree. Watch Shatner's facial expressions in particular. It was the reason why there were so many closeups of him in Season one. So many subtle expressions. He is transmitting A LOT of information with that handsome mug.

:)Spockboy

Are you being sarcastic?
 
In Bread and Circuses, I would have Kirk talk with Drusilla about the institution of slavery rather than sleeping with her offscreen.
 
In Bread and Circuses, I would have Kirk talk with Drusilla about the institution of slavery rather than sleeping with her offscreen.

Haven't seen that episode yet, but I gather that omission was due to the fact that they didn't want cram one more issue into the story and confuse it. Maybe Kirk gave her the choice of doing so or not.
 
All the times Scotty took the center seat, it should have been Uhura, Chekov, or Sulu. Scotty was fun, but he kept proving his place was in the engine room.
Besides, he also cheated on the Kobayashi Maru test and did not get a medal for original thinking - he should not have been allowed to be in command of the ship.
Had they put a black woman in command (even temporarily) it would have been a pretty bold statement for the day (it lost something when they did it in TAS).
 
All the times Scotty took the center seat, it should have been Uhura, Chekov, or Sulu. Scotty was fun, but he kept proving his place was in the engine room.
Besides, he also cheated on the Kobayashi Maru test and did not get a medal for original thinking - he should not have been allowed to be in command of the ship.
Had they put a black woman in command (even temporarily) it would have been a pretty bold statement for the day (it lost something when they did it in TAS).

Agreed, but Trek made PLENTY of bold statements in its time.

:)Spockboy
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top