There's facts, and there's how they're presented.
And as I demonstrated, Suicide Squad's very real dropoff wasn't reported unfairly. 67% is big. The average second-weekend dropoff is closer to 50%.
There's facts, and there's how they're presented.
And as I demonstrated, Suicide Squad's very real dropoff wasn't reported unfairly.
It's funny, because even if they weren't (when they quite obviously are), the film's financial success should speak for itself, right? It's getting sequels, it's getting spinoffs. It's huge. Why is that not enough?
I don't begrudge people who enjoy Suicide Squad, but from a perspective of craftsmanship and artistic quality, it's simply bad.
How is it bad, exactly? What's wrong with it in your opinion?
Stated earlier in the thread. You're welcome to dig it up.
Oh, I see.
Well I've read it and there's really nothing there to explain how it's "poorly made in a variety of ways", you mostly just complain about the plot which judging by some of the questions you raise you weren't paying much attention to anyway as they're all explained in the movie itself...
Remember that your perspective of craftsmanship and artistic quality is entirely different than others. You say that the Transformers films are better produced, but from my perspective the second one is so utterly offensive that it makes Suicide Squad look like Blade Runner.Basically, how much money a film makes has almost nothing to do with its artistic quality. A very good film could make lots of money, or bomb terribly. Same with a very bad film.
I don't begrudge people who enjoy Suicide Squad, but from a perspective of craftsmanship and artistic quality, it's simply bad. Poorly made in a variety of ways, from its writing to its direction to its editing to its post-production. Not sure how a major studio film ends up being so shoddily made in this day and age, although the aggressive schedule seems to have a lot to do with it. I'd say even Transformers films are better-produced, from that perspective.
I guess you didn't notice the bizarre editing, muddled direction, dodgy CGI, terrible dialogue, various plot danglers, and so on?
Nope, I didn't.
You keep using buzzwords with no substance behind them.
What's "bizarre" about the editing? What's "muddled" about the direction? Which CGI is "dodgy"? Which bit of dialogue is "terrible"? What plot elements were left "dangling"?
Words like "direction" and "editing" are buzzwords to you?![]()
Those still aren't "buzzwords."
Go read a review
I was asking about your view, and what you found so offensive about those things...
I already gave my view so I'm not sure what you're looking for, here.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.