Sometimes, I miss the days when it was just Star Trek around. There seemed to be this universe of weird and wild wonder where anything could happen. Even early TNG had some of this flavor. Then the spinoffs kinda devolved into bland, paint-by-numbers drama.
Completely agree.
It often seemed like TPTB were trying too hard, perhaps out of a feeling of obligation, to try to bind all the shows together by attaching a laundry list of things to each episode or season to keep it in line with the greater whole--like, each season had a Rommie or Borg quota, or whatever. It was sort of a half-hearted attempt at world building through the pretense of continuity.
Yet all the shows were so insular and self-contained that it really didn't matter.
Take something like the Maquis. It was briefly introduced in one show, briefly established in another to be used in a third. However, its significance in the first two series was minimal at best, and it's actual impact on the third was so small, one could argue it wasn't even worth the effort. All to create some sort of false bridge connecting the three shows.
However, everything else (Cling-ots, Rommies, Borg, et all) were all portrayed very differently from series to series. They included them out of obligation but changed them to fit the needs/time/agenda. Some were changed so much that one can't help but wonder why they ever bothered maintaining the illusion of a single universe at all. And why this one wonders why Fuller continues to do it.
DS9 was excellent. If you think that wwas paint by nunbers then you don't get what makes a good show.
It was pretty paint by numbers. And by "excellent" do you mean cliched and trite and overly pretentious?
The acting wasn't bad, though.