They look nothing alike.Are you sure about that?
![]()
They look nothing alike.Are you sure about that?
![]()
They look nothing alike.
Are you sure about that?
![]()
A) the spine behind the bridge was first seen on the USS Kelvin and the ships sent to Vulcan in ST'09.
B)check out the identical saucer rim
C)Judging by the window rows, it's much bigger than the TOS Enterprise. The Kelvin and her sisters are likewise.
D)The Kelvin's is red also, ditto the ST'09 Vulcan fleet and the USS Franklin
And as others have pointed out, that command chair has more in common with the new Enterprise's than anything prime.
I wonder if that video of the ship was made before they decided on the 10 year pre TOS setting. So it took on some Kelvin stylings?A) the spine behind the bridge was first seen on the USS Kelvin and the ships sent to Vulcan in ST'09.
B)check out the identical saucer rim
C)Judging by the window rows, it's much bigger than the TOS Enterprise. The Kelvin and her sisters are likewise.
D)The Kelvin's is red also, ditto the ST'09 Vulcan fleet and the USS Franklin
And as others have pointed out, that command chair has more in common with the new Enterprise's than anything prime.
Ok. I got nothing. The kelvin timeline is literally named that because it's the divergence point. That means the kelvin is essentially prime anyway.
A) the spine behind the bridge was first seen on the USS Kelvin and the ships sent to Vulcan in ST'09.
B)check out the identical saucer rim
C)Judging by the window rows, it's much bigger than the TOS Enterprise. The Kelvin and her sisters are likewise.
D)The Kelvin's is red also, ditto the ST'09 Vulcan fleet and the USS Franklin
And as others have pointed out, that command chair has more in common with the new Enterprise's than anything prime.
Except it's not.
In the story, it's the point where the timelines diverge. That's why they called it that. The Narada is also Prime, so is the Jellyfish, Red Matter and Nimoy Spock. Kelvin Timeline.
Except it's not.
Yes it is, actually.
Oh, wait, you're the one who doesn't acknowledge the existence of the new Abrams films. In that case this is a pointless conversation.
Aside from that. There are elements of the JJ movies that make them incompatible as a branch off of real Star Trek. If JJ Trek did exist it must be its own separate universe despite the appearance of familiar characters.
There are elements of the JJ movies that make them incompatible as a branch off of real Star Trek.
Not anything more than Enterprise has done. Or TMP, for that matter.
And there is no "real" Star Trek. All make believe.
Aside from that. There are elements of the JJ movies that make them incompatible as a branch off of real Star Trek. If JJ Trek did exist it must be its own separate universe despite the appearance of familiar characters.
That's something Trek does fairly well.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.