Does anyone else find it tacky that "Tos" is actually a character's name in Broken Bow?
This is a very good point. Spock is typically very precise with facts (except when it comes to casualties in WWI and II, apparently).There is little to no way to justify Kirk AND Spock's reaction to Cochrane. Spock (the really precise pedantic Vulcan?) doesn't make any qualifiers. ZC IS the discover of the space warp. Not Earth's.
This is a very good point. Spock is typically very precise with facts (except when it comes to casualties in WWI and II, apparently).
No. I mean the statistics Spock cites in "Bread and Circuses" being completely different to the actual number of casualties in WWI and WWII.Don't you mean the differences between the casualties of WWIII that Spock cites in "Bread and Circuses" (TOS) and the ones Riker cites in First Contact?
Early installment weirdness? In the ninth episode of season two? They were almost halfway through the series at that point.Also, as far as Spock's comments about Cochrane in TOS being the first warp discoverer? Either early installment weirdness, or maybe Cochrane's warp engine design slowly replaced the others?
Ninth episode of year two is still early days of a franchise that has lasted fifty years and counting.Early installment weirdness? In the ninth episode of season two? They were almost halfway through the series at that point.
By percentage you can apply that to anything pre-TNG. So why bother looking to TOS at all?Ninth episode of year two is still early days of a franchise that has lasted fifty years and counting.
Which, IMO is satisfactorily rationalized in my first post in this thread:But they doubled down and said that Chapter One is Zephram Cochrane.
Thing is, Cochrane's development of warp drive, even if he was just the human doing what other races in the galaxy had already done, led to humanity making contact with its first alien race, a move which ultimately led to the birth of the Federation. Also, the fact that Cochrane developed warp drive on his own in what were essentially post-apocalyptic conditions probably makes for a more uplifting and heroic story than the Vulcan think tank that came up with the idea after secluding themselves from the outside world for three years and immersing themselves in scientific journals and texts with the intent to prove once and for all nothing could move faster than light only to accidentally discover that, yes it is possible. Or the Tellarite story which involves fat guys mud wrestling...
That's where the issue lies. FC kind of tries to go that way. He's a great man. He's a philosopher, a leader. He takes mankind from the mud and puts them in the stars.Which, IMO is satisfactorily rationalized in my first post in this thread:
No. I mean the statistics Spock cites in "Bread and Circuses" being completely different to the actual number of casualties in WWI and WWII.
Early installment weirdness? In the ninth episode of season two? They were almost halfway through the series at that point.
The man figured out FTL travel on his own in a post-apocalyptic situation. He clearly had gifted engineering skills uncommon among the rest of the galaxy.But that doesn't get you in the first chapter of an engineering textbook in THE multicultural learning institution.
Definitely a possibility too.(Unless the Federation really IS a homo sapiens only club.)
Riker say basically that in Nemesis, destroy Earth and you destroy the Federation (not a exact quote).In TOS Earth was the leader of the Federation
Spock said "died" not casualties (not the same thing), aren't the figures Spock used fairly close to the military battlefield numbers?Spock is typically very precise with facts (except when it comes to casualties in WWI and II, apparently)
Didn't Spock say the discoverer? He never used the word "first."Spock's comments about Cochrane in TOS being the first warp discoverer
No but he said "the" not "a".Didn't Spock say the discoverer? He never used the word "first."
Like Howard Hughes, the aviator? Or William Shatner, the actor? Neither were the first. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure the intention at the time was probably that Cochrane was the first (just as it was probably that he was born on Alpha Centauri) but it isn't made explicit.No but he said "the" not "a".
Starfleet kind of is. Not literally, but it leans that way, being originally an Earth organization, and one which owes its role in galactic history to Cochrane.But that doesn't get you in the first chapter of an engineering textbook in THE multicultural learning institution. He'd be in the history courses and the philosophy courses. But not engineering. (Unless the Federation really IS a homo sapiens only club.)
An institution on Earth, lots of countries send their young officer cadets to American military academies (West Point, Colorado Springs), but these academies are still American military schools.But that doesn't get you in the first chapter of an engineering textbook in THE multicultural learning institution.
KIRK: Zefram Cochrane of Alpha Centuri, the discoverer of the space warp?
But doesn't it make sense that those would be Human planets, Human universities and cities? Cochrane is revered by Humans.SPOCK: The name of Zefram Cochrane is revered throughout the known galaxy. Planets were named after him. Great universities, cities.
Good point.Like Howard Hughes, the aviator? Or William Shatner, the actor? Neither were the first.
Not sure that was supposed to be the intent, more Cochrane was the first Human to discover the space warp. Prior to this episode, the Enterprise had encountered species with warp drive, the Gorn for example.Don't get me wrong, I'm sure the intention at the time was probably that Cochrane was the first
Like how Columbus discovered America, and was greeted on arrival by the people who got here first.."discoverer" implies that the person was the first one to discover the thing in question, which was previously unknown
To quote Spock:Does anyone know if Braga and Moore's intention was for the Vulcans to have warp drive? The way that pre-FC novels handled the Vulcan problem was to say "They live for hundreds of years and they're just the sort that would attempt STL space exploration." FC never says the Vulcans have warp drive. ENT does. FTL would certainly get their attention in that case, wouldn't it? (But Borg and Federation power sources apparently don't show up as well?)
The Vulcans had to get to those colonies somehow. To forget about Romulas it was no doubt far in the past. So they've been in space for a while.SPOCK: Vulcan, like Earth, had its aggressive colonising period. Savage, even by Earth standards. And if Romulans retain this martial philosophy, then weakness is something we dare not show.
Not all of space, just the part beyond the Federation. It was "crowded" in TOS too. How may older races who had evolved beyond physical forms did they meet? How many society controlling AIs?Then ENT comes along and says "Nope. Sorry! Earth was the last to the party. EVERYONE had warp drive before you!"
In TOS space was a frontier (apparently for everyone). By ENT it was a crowded neighborhood.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.