You seem very bitter and frustrated, in general, I mean.
HUGE Mr Sulu Spoiler
- Thread starter Danlav05
- Start date
You seem very bitter and frustrated, in general, I mean.
I believe I quite succinctly laid out the reasons you got an infraction for trolling in our PM discussion the other day, but since you wish to litigate it again, here's a reminder:
1) You said the "gay vibe" was running around half-naked, sweaty, and thrusting your "sword" in everyone's faces.
2) You said to play gay that you have to be campy and flamboyant.
3) You said homosexuality was being shoehorned in and forced on the audience, ironically in the same sentence where you said you have no problem with gays being on Trek even though you clearly do.
4) You said someone would have to put on a "gay voice" to play a gay character, which I presume is flamboyant, high-pitched, and with a lisp in your imagination.
5) You said Zachary Quinto can barely contain his gayness on the screen and can't "act straight," whatever that means, since he exhibits none of the flamboyant and stereotypical qualities you mention above as the calling cards of acting gay.
6) You broke out the slippery slope of "What's next if we accept gay characters? Bestiality?". Between Scotty and a tribble, no less.
7) You got needlessly political with the liberal comment.
There was nothing comedic about it. You've been on a homophobic tear around the entire BBS every time a thread about LGBT issues comes up. I suppose your next bits here are all just part of your comedy routine too, right?
I think I saw one person suggest that it was possible that Takei might have some latent homophobia as a result of living through the rampant homophobia of the past several decades as a closeted gay man at the time. One, and he raised the point in the most reasonable, sympathetic, and non-accusatory manner possible. Somehow you've managed to turn that into a whole movement of "The Gays" turning on themselves, because that "fun" thought obviously pleases you.
You say angry, hateful things and you really should consider taking a break from discussing gay issues before your head explodes or you get in trouble. I'm not telling you that you have to stop participating, but if you can't control how you express yourself in these discussions and avoid bigoted remarks you're going to get in trouble.
Don't bring up your infraction in the thread again.
Last edited:
Ah, Kirk...
*sighs* That's amazing, they managed to screw it up. They could have picked basically any other character besides Kirk, Uhura and Spock, and they picked Sulu even though it's more or less canon he's not gay. (yes I am aware you can have a family as gay). Bones would have been a much better choice. Amazing.
What do you care? Are you worried your status as a "special snowflake" will be diminished by recognizing that people are simply different from one another?
Not sure what is so hard to understand about "not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity"? It is the very first thing that popped up on Google.
You know exactly what I'm talking about. Stop acting obtuse.
I don't agree. Of course things after Vulcan exploded can't really be canon, but someones sexuality in my opinion shouldn't change. Or do you think Enterprise isn't canon anymore? It's not an "alternative" universe, it's the same universe.
It's a stupid question because you know full well what I mean, and I know you do. If by some reason you don't you're not up to par as a star trek fan to discuss with me. Anyway, I also wrote that it's "more or less canon". I'm done with you until you stop acting dumber than you are.
No I refuse to fall into that debatical trap of having to explain things that I know you know.
It isn't canon at all. And never was.
Well for me and many others it basically is and that's why it was a poor choice.
Similar threads
