• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What is THE Worst continuity error in Trek history..?!

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's what Jim Kirk would have done. Sulu was just following his role model's example. ;)
Contrary to popular belief Prime Universe Kirk was always a serious-minded responsible officer. While he would violate orders he didn't agree with for the purposes of serving the greater good, if someone died under his command he would admit to everything and take responsibility as a proper captain would. And truth be told, I would think Sulu would be the same kind of captain, despite what Flashback tries to tell us.

It's true, Abramsverse Kirk is okay with falsifying his logs, but that's just an example of how those movies are a disservice to the character.
 
Contrary to popular belief Prime Universe Kirk was always a serious-minded responsible officer. While he would violate orders he didn't agree with for the purposes of serving the greater good, if someone died under his command he would admit to everything and take responsibility as a proper captain would.
"Captain's log, Star date 1313.8. Add to official losses, Doctor Elizabeth Dehner. Be it noted she gave her life in performance of her duty. Lieutenant Commander Gary Mitchell, same notation. [to Spock] I want his service record to end that way. He didn't ask for what happened to him."
 
Contrary to popular belief Prime Universe Kirk was always a serious-minded responsible officer. While he would violate orders he didn't agree with for the purposes of serving the greater good, if someone died under his command he would admit to everything and take responsibility as a proper captain would. And truth be told, I would think Sulu would be the same kind of captain, despite what Flashback tries to tell us.

It's true, Abramsverse Kirk is okay with falsifying his logs, but that's just an example of how those movies are a disservice to the character.
If Kirk reported the numbers of redshirt deaths that occurred on his watch in TOS, the Enterprise would probably come to be known as the Death Ship.
 
"Captain's log, Star date 1313.8. Add to official losses, Doctor Elizabeth Dehner. Be it noted she gave her life in performance of her duty. Lieutenant Commander Gary Mitchell, same notation. [to Spock] I want his service record to end that way. He didn't ask for what happened to him."

It could be argued that Gary died the moment the galactic barrier took control of him.
 
The difficulty with dealing with a fictional culture is just that, it can be whatever you want it to mean especially since there are few examples in the show. Spock no more represents all of Vulcan with his attitude to emotions and sexual matters anymore than Bones represents all Terrans. Spock was raised to be more Vulcan than Vulcan being the son of Sarek. Showing emotions in his culture is taboo and he took his culture seriously. Yet I doubt Vulcan sex between consenting bondmates is as clinical as you seem to want it to be, my only proof unless Amanda was a frigid masochist she ain't waiting no seven years for sex. As for not being able to 'love Christine', he also agonised that he never told his mother he loved her, you telling me Spock had some biological gene making him incapable of love or any other emotion? Did the Romulans breed out this gene from their race?

P.S STNG episode 'Sarek', Vulcans are more than capable of their version of love and their wives know it. Re 1. Picard being the sinkhole for Sarek's emotions 2. the scene between Picard and Perrin

Spock isn't exactly the same as other Vulcans, so...? The control /suppression of emotion and primal urges is still what defines a Vulcan. There isn't much room for leeway in individuals, unless you just plain rebel like Sybok.
-----------------------
"Amanda ... ain't waiting no seven years for sex"... !! Sex often goes out of a marriage at some point, with the marriage continuing as a companionship thing. Sometimes injury or dysfunction happens, and the relationship goes on. If you're marrying a Vulcan, you're going to have to make an adjustment like that, with little or nothing in the way of (overt ) love or sex. That's one interesting thing about Babel-- you have to wonder what this relationship could possibly be, how it works, considering, you know...
------------------
It does no good to point out to me (as people keep doing over and over) that sex only every seven years is unworkable. That doesn't change what they hammer into us about a Vulcan 's nature.
Any incongruities concerning their reproduction will have to be taken up with others besides me.
------------------------
"you telling me Spock had some biological gene making him incapable of love or any other emotion?" Spock underwent a combination of mental disciplines to suppress and overcome, and neutralize, emotion, love being one of the big ones. I really don't see how they could have made this clearer. This has all been going on so long, and the discipline is so effective and runs so deeply , that some basic impulses necessary to any species are insisting on erupting out onto the surface again-- pon farr. So it's deep suppression and control techniques with a biological element too.
-------------------
So in Naked Time, he's agonizing about not being able to feel love for his mother too. It's not totally impossible for him to, but it would mean working his way back out of all the disciplines, and totally denying and turning his back on his Vulcan nature. This is the conflict we're seeing with Spock alone in the briefing room.
----------------------------
The episode "Sarek" is one of the strongest statements ever about how utterly outside of a Vulcan's world it is to feel emotions such as love, overtly, as humans do. Wife #2 had to infer and assume that love lay somewhere under all those layers of control and detachment. Sarek was certainly never going to say "I love you"... Picard had to do it for him. Look how deep and intense the mind meld had to get, before Picard ran across that love. . . Sarek denies it, calling her "sentimental".
---------------------
The whole problem in the episode was Sarek being observed experiencing emotion (as when listening to the music), thus showing he's losing Vulcan control / suppression. The fact that his aides were so alarmed shows just how much neutralizing emotion means to Vulcans.
 
"Captain's log, Star date 1313.8. Add to official losses, Doctor Elizabeth Dehner. Be it noted she gave her life in performance of her duty. Lieutenant Commander Gary Mitchell, same notation. [to Spock] I want his service record to end that way. He didn't ask for what happened to him."
That's more a case of stretching the truth than completely disregarding it. I'm sure for everyone else killed on that mission he stated they were killed by an unknown alien entity, a truth from a certain point of view. He didn't pretend they didn't happen.
If Kirk reported the numbers of redshirt deaths that occurred on his watch in TOS, the Enterprise would probably come to be known as the Death Ship.
Would it? At least the Enterprise still had surviving crew, ships like the Exeter or the Constellation didn't. Also, the recent DS9 novel Force and Motion mentions that 24th century Starfleet officers make jokes about "23rd century Redshirts" so clearly it wasn't just the Enterprise that saw a high mortality rate among the men in red.
 
It's sad Janeway regarded Kirk and co. as cowboys who shot first and asked questions later. It's something you can actually observe, characters becoming caricatures and cliches. And often times that gets fed back into the show during later iterations. You see it all the time here on the forums as well where people end up disliking the caricature of a show rather than the actual content. People bashing TNG because it's too preachy, or the characters are too perfect. People calling Kirk womanizing, no he wasn't really. he certainly has multiple partners but he wasn't trying to get in the pants of every female. Or look how people do that imitation Kirk speech cadence. You can't find that cadence anywhere in Shatner's work as Kirk.
 
That's more a case of stretching the truth than completely disregarding it. I'm sure for everyone else killed on that mission he stated they were killed by an unknown alien entity, a truth from a certain point of view. He didn't pretend they didn't happen.
When you say that something is true "from a certain point of view," the technical term for that is "lying."
 
Contrary to popular belief Prime Universe Kirk was always a serious-minded responsible officer. While he would violate orders he didn't agree with for the purposes of serving the greater good, if someone died under his command he would admit to everything and take responsibility as a proper captain would. And truth be told, I would think Sulu would be the same kind of captain, despite what Flashback tries to tell us.

It's true, Abramsverse Kirk is okay with falsifying his logs, but that's just an example of how those movies are a disservice to the character.
"Disservice?" He felt like a natural outgrowth of what had been presented in those films to me.
 
Like I said, it can be argued that Gary Mitchell died the moment that the entity from the barrier took control of his body. From that point on, it wasn't Gary. So in a very real sense, he WAS killed in the line of duty. And from that POV, Kirk's log entry is accurate.
 
I'm sure that Kirk was filing more detailed reports for his superiors, but especially in a case like this, a lot of the details probably end up classified. When he chooses a simple "cause of death" for his log like that, it's probably what's going to be out there in Gary's publicly available short-form service record...he basically has to sum it up into one simplified option or another that isn't going to tell the whole story, so he opts for something that won't make his friend look bad.
 
24th century Starfleet officers make jokes about "23rd century Redshirts"
But but ... 24th century Starfleet officers are evolved self-improved beings who are superior in every way from those from their past, they would never say anything like that !!!!!
 
Spock isn't exactly the same as other Vulcans, so...? The control /suppression of emotion and primal urges is still what defines a Vulcan. There isn't much room for leeway in individuals, unless you just plain rebel like Sybok.
-----------------------
"Amanda ... ain't waiting no seven years for sex"... !! Sex often goes out of a marriage at some point, with the marriage continuing as a companionship thing. Sometimes injury or dysfunction happens, and the relationship goes on. If you're marrying a Vulcan, you're going to have to make an adjustment like that, with little or nothing in the way of (overt ) love or sex. That's one interesting thing about Babel-- you have to wonder what this relationship could possibly be, how it works, considering, you know...
------------------
It does no good to point out to me (as people keep doing over and over) that sex only every seven years is unworkable. That doesn't change what they hammer into us about a Vulcan 's nature.
Any incongruities concerning their reproduction will have to be taken up with others besides me.
------------------------
"you telling me Spock had some biological gene making him incapable of love or any other emotion?" Spock underwent a combination of mental disciplines to suppress and overcome, and neutralize, emotion, love being one of the big ones. I really don't see how they could have made this clearer. This has all been going on so long, and the discipline is so effective and runs so deeply , that some basic impulses necessary to any species are insisting on erupting out onto the surface again-- pon farr. So it's deep suppression and control techniques with a biological element too.
-------------------
So in Naked Time, he's agonizing about not being able to feel love for his mother too. It's not totally impossible for him to, but it would mean working his way back out of all the disciplines, and totally denying and turning his back on his Vulcan nature. This is the conflict we're seeing with Spock alone in the briefing room.
----------------------------
The episode "Sarek" is one of the strongest statements ever about how utterly outside of a Vulcan's world it is to feel emotions such as love, overtly, as humans do. Wife #2 had to infer and assume that love lay somewhere under all those layers of control and detachment. Sarek was certainly never going to say "I love you"... Picard had to do it for him. Look how deep and intense the mind meld had to get, before Picard ran across that love. . . Sarek denies it, calling her "sentimental".
---------------------
The whole problem in the episode was Sarek being observed experiencing emotion (as when listening to the music), thus showing he's losing Vulcan control / suppression. The fact that his aides were so alarmed shows just how much neutralizing emotion means to Vulcans.

I'm not sure what you mean by overt love. What might be overt to one person might go over someone else's head completely. Some people prefer not to say "I love you" but show it in different ways like quality time or doing something in service. Gary Chapman's "The 5 Love Languages" has this in more detail. Human couples misunderstand each other all the time when partners have different preferred love languages, so it can be much tougher for an interspecies one. No wonder Trip and T'Pol had problems. It would have been interesting to learn how Sarek and Amanda handled it but we only see them as a longtime couple.
https://www.amazon.com/Love-Languag...466818806&sr=1-1&keywords=five+love+languages

But one biological element no one has mentioned is telepathy. Why do they avoid shaking strangers' hands? Getting the thoughts and feelings of someone you just met is TMI. Now TOS doesn't specifically talk about mating bonds like ENT did in Bound. But the fact that a priest initiates the connection between a girl and boy during a betrothal implies that he is trying to facilitate the formation of one. Evidently, that didn't work with Spock and T'Pring but it provides the seeds for what ENT did. Through holding hands (privately) and touching fingers, spouses know what the other is thinking. They might think Hallmark cards are useless but they don't have to talk about love in order to feel it. Why not when you can literally feel if your spouse had a good or bad day (among other things)? For them not to feel anything remotely related to love requires more than just celibacy. They would have to avoid touching each other. They makes sex every 7 years look easy. As for parents and children, Terra Prime implies there's a similar telepathic bond between them because T'Pol knows that Elizabeth is her daughter from the moment she learns she has a kid. It might be different between Spock and Amanda if she's human.

Then there's the Vulcan English dictionary. For a species that seems emotionless to outsiders, they sure have lots of words related to love. If they didn't experience stuff like this, why would those words exist? http://www.starbase-10.de/vld/

t'hy'la: friend-lover-lifelong companion, blood brother/sister; soulmate; soul-brother/sister (Gene Rodenberry came up with it himself for TMP novelization)
ashal-veh: darling
ashayam: a beloved person; used as a term of endearment; similar to t'hy'la but more personal and with emotional connotations

I will leave you with a paragraph from A Thousand Splendid Suns. It's actually about how boys and girls express friendship but the male POV fits perfectly with how Vulcans treat love.

Khaled Hosseini said:
How many times had she, Hasina, and Giti said those same three words to each other, Laila wondered, said it without hesitation, after only two or three days of not seeing each other? I missed you, Hasina. Oh, I missed you too. In Tariq's grimace, Laila learned that boys differed from girls in this regard. They didn't make a show of friendship. They felt no urge, no need, for this sort of talk. Laila imagined it had been that way for her brothers too. Boys, Laila came to see, treated friendship the way they treated the sun: its existence undisputed; its radiance best enjoyed, not beheld directly.
 
Last edited:
But but ... 24th century Starfleet officers are evolved self-improved beings who are superior in every way from those from their past, they would never say anything like that !!!!!
Well, the character who mentioned the joke was Ben Maxwell from TNG The Wounded, who kind of wasn't the best example of 24th century enlightenment.
 
They had trouble writing for Troi- most of the time they had to find a way to get her perceptions nullified so they could advance the plot.
IIRC there was a novel where it was explained that the Ferengi considered Gold Pressed Latinum to be their currency because it was one of the only things which could not be replicated- something to do with it's very unusual structure.
For a technological society where you can create anything from energy I can see the advantage to having a currency which could not be rezed up on demand.
What I don't remember is whether or not it could be moved by transporter which should have had the same issues.
FWIW, I tended to assume that latinum is needed to run transporters/replicators (like dilithium in warp drives). So while you can replicate it, you use more latinum than you get out, so you lose out.
 
I doubt it. Latinum is liquid at room temperature, just like mercury. Unless it has expansive conductive properties or something, it may just be rare, or at least rare in a sense that the Ferengi value for that reason.
 
Like 'Self sealing stem bolts', Gold Pressed Latinum was never explained properly. For a culture as money driven as the Ferengi it has to be something special for them to base their currency on. Considering the level of replicator ability it also would not make sense to base your currency on something that could be produced easily by the ton if you wanted to. Replicators only seem to need power fed to them (Voyager) and a pattern to base the creation on for production. I like the idea of GPL having some weird property which would throw replicators into a loop trying to resolve
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top