I LOVED Trip; he was the only thing that really kept me coming back. It took awhile for him to grow on me, but I suddenly found myself only really caring about that character.
I think one of the biggest flaws of the show, other than writers/producers who simply didn't give a crap, was the character of Archer. He was the captain, supposedly the central figure. He was supposed to set the tone of the entire show. If you think back to Kirk, Picard, and even Sisko and Janeway, you KNEW who they were fairly quickly. But Archer? There was a lot of talk about Archer, and god knows he made enough speeches, but we never really got to know him as a person. Chalk it up to bad or inconsistent writing but I always felt that we were being TOLD how awesome he was, but never really got to see it.
With Trip and T'Pol, we got to see them, in both their words and deeds--warts and all. I think the reason I really came to love Trip was because all the emotion of the show was funneled through him. That character became the mouthpiece for all the emotions that a person might feel in those situations, so we got to know him, sympathize with him, understand his mistakes, etc. Trip and T'Pol had real character development; they were far more interesting and believable because I could see and feel who they were.
Archer just stood around being noble and philosophical, and never felt like a real person to me--which was surprising, because I really enjoyed Bakula in QL and Murphy Brown. I don't know about you, but if I can't feel some sort of emotional connection to the characters, I can't really engage with the show, no matter how interesting the plots might be. For me, Trip WAS Enterprise because he was way I connected to the program.
I think one of the biggest flaws of the show, other than writers/producers who simply didn't give a crap, was the character of Archer. He was the captain, supposedly the central figure. He was supposed to set the tone of the entire show. If you think back to Kirk, Picard, and even Sisko and Janeway, you KNEW who they were fairly quickly. But Archer? There was a lot of talk about Archer, and god knows he made enough speeches, but we never really got to know him as a person. Chalk it up to bad or inconsistent writing but I always felt that we were being TOLD how awesome he was, but never really got to see it.
With Trip and T'Pol, we got to see them, in both their words and deeds--warts and all. I think the reason I really came to love Trip was because all the emotion of the show was funneled through him. That character became the mouthpiece for all the emotions that a person might feel in those situations, so we got to know him, sympathize with him, understand his mistakes, etc. Trip and T'Pol had real character development; they were far more interesting and believable because I could see and feel who they were.
Archer just stood around being noble and philosophical, and never felt like a real person to me--which was surprising, because I really enjoyed Bakula in QL and Murphy Brown. I don't know about you, but if I can't feel some sort of emotional connection to the characters, I can't really engage with the show, no matter how interesting the plots might be. For me, Trip WAS Enterprise because he was way I connected to the program.
Last edited: