What's going to happen to the Ed Dome now that the Rams have moved out?
As for the Trop: Its actual playing area isn't that bad, I guess, although I always thought they should paint the inside surface of the roof with a starfield or cloudscape to make it look less like a damn office building.And they should gut and rebuild the interior concourses, which look like the 80's threw up.
When was the last time you went to a game at the Trop?
Oh ok. They have done some remodeling since then. It's not NYC level quality, but it ain't bad.About four years ago.
I say if they build 'em with public money, then the admission should be free. Yeah, that'll fly.
Any city building a new MLB field is run by fools, there is NO real threat of anyone moving because there is nowhere for them to go, baseball teams require huge support bases, Charlotte, Portland, Nashville, San Antonio, not a chance, and Montreal is a pipe dream, the Jays will move to Mexico before Canada gets another team.
Oh ok. They have done some remodeling since then. It's not NYC level quality, but it ain't bad.
What's going to happen to the Ed Dome now that the Rams have moved out?
The Fabulous Forum in Inglewood, Ca., former home of the Lakers, is now owned by MSG, and is rivaling Staples Center (Lakers' current home) in attracting A-list rock acts.I dunno. What has San Antonio been doing with the Alamodome since the Spurs moved out?
San Diegans are poised to vote on public financing for a new stadium the the Chargers this summer. If the ballot measure is turned down, the Chargers will leave for Inglewood.
There is, yes. If San Diegans vote in favor of offering public funds to Dean Spanos, it is expected that the Chargers will remain in San Diego thereby freeing the Raiders to work out a deal with the Rams and move to L.A. once it is finalized. The Raiders are also still considering a move to Vegas if they they can get a stadium built there.Is there no possibility that the other team in Inglewood could be the Raiders and not the Chargers?
I agree. The speculation I'v read is that the league voted in Spanos' favor because he has been such a "good soldier" for much longer than Mark Davis. Supposedly, the rest of the owners have very little respect for Davis. If he thinks his ridiculous look has no effect on the way others see him, then Mark Davis is way out of touch. He looks like a clown and gets treated like one.Because when all is said and done, the Raiders need a new stadium much more than the Chargers do. Never mind WHO pays for it.
I don't know that Vegas is his endgame. It may be the best choice until the Charger's situation is settled one way or the other. Some still believe that the Vegas talk is still just a ploy to get something out of the City of Oakland. But besides that, the big rub in Vegas is getting a stadium built AND getting league approval. We'll have to wait and see. The Chargers' situation should be resolved before the start of the season.Everyone knows that Davis' endgame is to wind up in Vegas, whereas Spanos and Kroenke (the latter of whom can produce most of the financing) are fine with being perfect strangers in a stadium.
There is, yes. If San Diegans vote in favor of offering public funds to Dean Spanos, it is expected that the Chargers will remain in San Diego thereby freeing the Raiders to work out a deal with the Rams and move to L.A. once it is finalized. The Raiders are also still considering a move to Vegas if they they can get a stadium built there.
The real issue for the A's is the moronic agreement Selig brokered that gave the Giants the territorial rights to San Jose and the right to block any move by any team to that area.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.