Why do people die in Star Trek?

Discussion in 'General Trek Discussion' started by PhaserLightShow, Mar 31, 2016.

  1. Kemaiku

    Kemaiku Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    Northern Ireland
    I guess another reason is, outside of Riker and a few others, very few people in the future like the idea of immortality. They expect to live a full life and die the same as everyone else.
     
  2. Kor

    Kor Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Location:
    My mansion on Qo'noS
    That's a good point about characters' simply not desiring immortality. And we have seen that the human lifespan is much longer in the 24th century than it is today.

    I can imagine how enriching and satisfying that would be in a utopian world where people work to better themselves and the rest of humanity, as opposed to today's reality of being a wage slave for decades, barely making ends meet from week to week, and then suddenly croaking one day on the bus ride home.

    Kor
     
  3. Kemaiku

    Kemaiku Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    Northern Ireland
    I'd imagine having decades longer and being able to make the most of all of it would be satisfying enough to most people in the Federation. Trying to artificially extend their lives probably doesn't even occur to them, there's not much point.

    And in Starfleet, I think they know how dangerous their duties will be, and that the ship needs it's resources for the living crew. They wouldn't want the time and energy being wasted on bringing them back when it's better needed elsewhere.
     
  4. PhaserLightShow

    PhaserLightShow Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2016
    Location:
    USS Enterprise
    I don't believe in souls (so Data and Riker don't have souls, and neither does anyone else). I believe that a person is the sum of his physical parts (atoms). Nothing more. I am an Atheist.

    @PhaserLightShow
     
  5. Kor

    Kor Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Location:
    My mansion on Qo'noS
    Does atheism necessarily preclude metaphysical discourse? How about Immanuel Kant?

    If an exact duplicate was made of Lieutenant Carey after he died, down to the minutest subatomic detail and with all of the same memories, would it really be the same person? These things merit discussion.

    Kor
     
  6. Kemaiku

    Kemaiku Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    Northern Ireland
    Well not really, since they occupy two different points in space, they always perceive the world slightly differently, and will go off to lead separate lives, have different experiences and interactions that will shape all the subsequent moments of their life.

    They will quickly become two unique individuals, more like identical twins.
     
  7. Kor

    Kor Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Location:
    My mansion on Qo'noS
    I meant if the first Lt. Carey stayed dead and the duplicate replaced him.

    Kor
     
  8. PhaserLightShow

    PhaserLightShow Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2016
    Location:
    USS Enterprise
    I think it would be the same person. As I previously indicated, Admiral @Kor, I don't believe in souls or spirits.
    As I said, I believe a person is the sum of his atoms, particles, etc. (you name it)
    With the same memories, he would have the same motivation (memories of that motivation and the same memories that lead him/her to that motivation). The way I see it, memories dictate your intentions and the rest of the body dictate how many of your intentions can become actions (the rest of the body also carries out those actions). Any reasons why Lieutenant Carey would not be the same person with the circumstances you noted?

    @PhaserLightShow
     
  9. Longinus

    Longinus Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    @PhaserLightShow

    You don't need to believe in souls to recognise that a copy and the original are two different things. Let's say we make an identical copy of you. Then it turns out that one of you needs to be killed (Captain Janeway decrees it.) Would you care whether it is you or your copy who is to be killed?
     
  10. Kor

    Kor Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Location:
    My mansion on Qo'noS
    What if Lt. Carey was materialized into two identical beings in a freak transporter accident? (Not one weak version and one strong version, or one good and one evil, but truly identical in every conceivable way)

    Or how about a whole army of Lt. Careys? Which one of the identical Careys would have the right to assume the identity of Lt. Carey? If Lt. Carey had a significant other, which Lt. Carey would continue the relationship?

    I'm suddenly having flashbacks to the Tom Cruise movie Oblivion for some reason...

    Kor
     
  11. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    Which is really gross if you think about it. When you rematerialize, part of you may be from Ensign Jones morning dump. :eek:
     
  12. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    That is an aspect of the future that I personally find both engaging and alien. It is quite interesting to consider the idea that instead of working so much, that people are pursing their passions or goals, rather than working in a manner current to contemporary society.
    I wouldn't have to work for the materials for my cosplay-I could just make them and it would authentic ;)


    So? We are dealing within the metaphysics of the universe of Star Trek. And, regardless of philosophical framework, there is something unique about individuals, call it a soul, or quantum signature, or atomic space, or what-have-you. It is uniquely present, even if it can't be quantified, which is why it is a philosophical question, not a scientific one.

    That was part of a DS9 episode as well. A man cloned himself, murdered it, and then framed Odo.
     
  13. Tomalak

    Tomalak Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Location:
    Manchester
    All that stuff from "waste extraction" has got to go somewhere...
     
    BillJ likes this.
  14. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Does that mean that when I transport is just removes all the waste material? No wonder we don't see any bathrooms.
     
  15. Kor

    Kor Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Location:
    My mansion on Qo'noS
    I assumed it would feed into the replicator systems.

    Excuse me a moment.

    :barf:

    Kor
     
    BillJ likes this.
  16. Tomalak

    Tomalak Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Location:
    Manchester
    Ha. I think it literally does if you go by the TNG Tech Manual. Everything on the ship is recycled, and there's a big tank full of goo that gets reconfigured by the replicators to make food. No wonder Joe Sisko's restaurant is always busy.
     
    BillJ likes this.
  17. Longinus

    Longinus Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Considering the matter is probably taken apart on molecular level, I really don't see a problem with this. I am sure that here in the real world many of the carbon atoms and water molecules that comprised your breakfast today have been part of someone's faeces at some point during the five billion year history of Earth.

    You're welcome.
     
  18. Kor

    Kor Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Location:
    My mansion on Qo'noS
    And we're also drinking woolly mammoth urine every day.

    Kor
     
  19. Tomalak

    Tomalak Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Location:
    Manchester
    Well yeah, exactly. The water we drink has passed through millions of organisms before it gets to us. By the 24th century, no one bats an eyelid. How else can you expect to sustain a crew of a thousand on a ship cut off from regular supply for potentially years at a time?
     
  20. PhaserLightShow

    PhaserLightShow Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2016
    Location:
    USS Enterprise
    No. Because my thoughts would still exist.

    Which Lt. Carey? Whichever was physically closest (nearest, I mean to say) to the significant other. If all the others died, whoever was still alive. And an army of Lt. Careys would be fine.
    This thread (and its question) makes me ask another, related question. Why did Commander Bruce Maddox (TNG: "The Measure of a Man") not simply replicate Data instead of taking him apart. You could still have an army of Soong Android's, but without hurting Data.

    @PhaserLightShow