Anyone remember what episode this scene is from?
That’s right. Here is a video of the original shots. See time index 2:49 and 3:00 (no sound).I think it's from the final battle before the Cardassians switch sides from "What You Leave Behind".
Anyone remember what episode this scene is from?
That’s right. Here is a video of the original shots. See time index 2:49 and 3:00 (no sound).I think it's from the final battle before the Cardassians switch sides from "What You Leave Behind".
Maybe they're thinking the HD version of the series would be re-framed to 16:9 like the X-Files. But the X-Files was shot in such a way as to be "safe" in either aspect ratio. Voyager probably wasn't.
Kor
A lot of the time there is still SOME useable width before the junk becomes visible. You could still crop a 16:9 ratio shot out of more than the original 4:3,. Also, a pretty standard package could remove some clutter fairly easily if time consumingly (a job for the intern !), giving more options.Ahh...ya know, I wish those series which were shot in 16:9 and cropped for TV back then were done so with care not to have junk/people/lights in the frame. Hindsight is lovely. But even then, there would be lots of people who would object to the 16:9 versions being released because the director was originally only focused on the 4:3 crop. I get it, but I'd still be on team 16:9. BUT, moot point - junk in the frame, TNG already released anyway, DS9 doesn't look likely, yada yada.
We need to get Bryan Fuller to make DS9-R a condition of his being showrunner for the 2017 series!
The goal is to cut costs, not triple them.A lot of the time there is still SOME useable width before the junk becomes visible. You could still crop a 16:9 ratio shot out of more than the original 4:3,. Also, a pretty standard package could remove some clutter fairly easily if time consumingly (a job for the intern !), giving more options.
Adding CGI areas at the sides of the existing 4:3 is probably way too expensive/obvious for much other than space shots.
Oh yeah, I didn't say it was financially viable !The goal is to cut costs, not triple them.
sounds like it fits right in with the premise of the thread thenOh yeah, I didn't say it was financially viable !
We need to get Bryan Fuller to make DS9-R a condition of his being showrunner for the 2017 series!
Well, not to burst your bubble, but there is this:It's a stretch to say Fuller is a "DS9 guy" - according to Memory Alpha, he contributed the story of TWO episodes.
Bryan Fuller is a Voyager guy, through and through...
’Deep Space Nine’ was the best of the modern ones, because it was so emotionally complicated.
There is? That's the first time I'm hearing about it. I thought they're more or less identical.Wishful thinking, I know, but it's worth a shot. I was planning to get the DS9 1-7 R2 set on Amazon UK, but I've heard there's quite a large difference between the two regions' transfers.
AFAIK its a fan made recreation, NOT using any original CGI assets - much like this HD recreation of the Voyager title sequence:
I only know of a single rerendered frame from original assets, showing a ship flyby, posted on TrekCore.
I honestly believe the artists do have the lionshare of CG work on hand, and it can be rerendered with minimal effort.
Mojo on Facebook posted rerendered 1080 animations from Sacrifice of Angels.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.