RTD still holds the record for the lowest AI score though, with Love and Monsters I believe but even that was, all in all a good score in the AI scale.
I see you're ignoring the viewing figures this week because they're up and focusing on the AI 'cos it's down. Good old confirmation bias eh? Ah well we're all guilty of that.
And, IIRC, AI figures for Series 8 were also averaging 83-84. So whilst this ep is on the low end for NuWho as a whole, it's about par for the course for Capaldi's run, and yet people are still watching.
I think the AI reviewers are just getting a bit more jaded. God knows Who fans are. It's like a Laurence Miles lookalike competition these days.
What were the overnights this week, BTW?
4.85M, highest so far this series. It has been pointed out that Who got a bit of a boost by Strictly overrunning, but apparently even factoring this in the numbers only drop to about 4.61 so it's still the best this year.
I think everyone's getting more jaded with Who, this is what happens when a show runs for so long (I seem to recall one season of Spooks that had dire viewing figures, yet it still ran for another three or four years.) The truth of the matter seems to be this: fewer people are watching Who and they're enjoying it slightly less, but the flipside is that large numbers of people are still watching Who and they're generally really enjoying it (82 is still very good, hell my understanding is that 76 for Love and Monsters is an AI a lot of shows would kill for)![]()
Indeed. I'm also not drawing any conclusions about viewing figures until the Beeb releases the iPlayer data. BARB ratings don't factor it in, and the metrics suggest the portion of the audience downloading the ep has increased series-on-series.
I'm sure the rise of Netflix has also captured some viewers away from "Live or DVR".