Even so, it's the responsibility of the states to send electors. When the Confederate former states didn't send any, there wasn't any Constitutional problem; their potential votes weren't even factored in, and only the votes actually submitted counted for anything. Ergo, as long as Missouri could throw a state legislature together, they could appoint a few electors to vote to re-elect the president, which the presumably nearby Congress would certify - problem solved.
Here's hoping Dr. Scott survives!
(My nitpick of the season: what the hell was with those mountains in the not-too-far background of that one shot of the oil rig off the Louisiana coast blowing up?! Sloppy!![]()
)
All in all, a very strong season; at least as good as the first, IMO.![]()
Not quite; Lincoln made a point of consistently considering them Union states in a period of rebellion, as he held that states have no legal/Constitutional basis to unilaterally secede. If the states had sent electors in the 1864 election, voting for McClellan... that would have presented a fascinating Constitutional dilemma, but they didn't.Not quite. Think about what you just wrote: Confederate Former States.
The whole point behind creating the Confederacy was to create a separate political entity from the United States not under the authority of the US Government. That meant from the time the confederacy was formed to the surrender at Appomattox The United States of America and The Confederate States of America were two entirely different nations, and both sides of the war treated them as such.
No, a state that didn't manage to get its affairs in order to send electors does not equate to a disloyal state. The Constitution is a very short document, after all, and states:So your solution is based on a flawed premise, in that you have Congress treating Missouri as a loyal state (Union) and all the others as disloyal states (Confederates) just because it managed to get Electors to Defiance first.
Not quite; Lincoln made a point of consistently considering them Union states in a period of rebellion, as he held that states have no legal/Constitutional basis to unilaterally secede. If the states had sent electors in the 1864 election, voting for McClellan... that would have presented a fascinating Constitutional dilemma, but they didn't.Not quite. Think about what you just wrote: Confederate Former States.
The whole point behind creating the Confederacy was to create a separate political entity from the United States not under the authority of the US Government. That meant from the time the confederacy was formed to the surrender at Appomattox The United States of America and The Confederate States of America were two entirely different nations, and both sides of the war treated them as such.
Actually, my wiggle room comes from the same place as your system gaming. After all, what happens if none of the states make the deadline? And there's no other candidates? And, dadgummit, we gotta have a president for a full term! Michener's right there and he's been doin' the job for twelve months! All in favor?No, a state that didn't manage to get its affairs in order to send electors does not equate to a disloyal state. The Constitution is a very short document, after all, and states:So your solution is based on a flawed premise, in that you have Congress treating Missouri as a loyal state (Union) and all the others as disloyal states (Confederates) just because it managed to get Electors to Defiance first.So, if the national Congress sets a deadline, even a very short one given the country's state of devastation, and, say, Oregon doesn't get its stuff in order to appoint electors and send votes, that's on them. Yes, I'm gaming the system for the sake of convenience here, but then, so are you with your suggestion of "wiggle room" for a term extension, by which I've no idea what you're referring to.The Congress may determine the Time of choosing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
![]()
I also doubt the writers will give us an election storyline anytime soon, especially with their vagueness about the current year.
Occupied insurrectionary territory, yes - hence his military justification for freeing said slaves. Foreign soil, no - the Constitution says that it's the federal government's job to ensure states have a republican form of government, i.e., unless properly dismissed from the Union, which the Confederate states were not, they could not, by definition, be foreign soil. See the SCOTUS case Texas v. White (1869).Maybe, but legally speaking if Lincoln had held to that he could never have issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which was essentially an executive order that declared all slaves in the southern states free. He wouldn't have had the authority if the confederate states were still states. The authority came from Lincoln's standing as commander-in-chief of the armed forces and the political idea that the confederacy was foreign soil and occupied enemy territory.
That's an easy one. Per the Constitution, in the event of an electoral college tie (and zero votes is, after all, a tie), the House of Representatives elects the president. AFAIK, however, there is no Constitutional flexibility on electing a president every four years. In short, you're wiggling considerably more than I am here.Actually, my wiggle room comes from the same place as your system gaming. After all, what happens if none of the states make the deadline? And there's no other candidates?
Occupied insurrectionary territory, yes - hence his military justification for freeing said slaves. Foreign soil, no - the Constitution says that it's the federal government's job to ensure states have a republican form of government, i.e., unless properly dismissed from the Union, which the Confederate states were not, they could not, by definition, be foreign soil. See the SCOTUS case Texas v. White (1869).Maybe, but legally speaking if Lincoln had held to that he could never have issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which was essentially an executive order that declared all slaves in the southern states free. He wouldn't have had the authority if the confederate states were still states. The authority came from Lincoln's standing as commander-in-chief of the armed forces and the political idea that the confederacy was foreign soil and occupied enemy territory.
Never claimed different. I mainly just questioned the reasoning for your solution, which you explained. I stand corrected.That's an easy one. Per the Constitution, in the event of an electoral college tie (and zero votes is, after all, a tie), the House of Representatives elects the president. AFAIK, however, there is no Constitutional flexibility on electing a president every four years. In short, you're wiggling considerably more than I am here.Actually, my wiggle room comes from the same place as your system gaming. After all, what happens if none of the states make the deadline? And there's no other candidates?![]()
There are full bird Captains in real life running Burkes, so it's not a huge deal.Oh! That got the blood pumping! I noticed both Chandler and Slattery have been promoted, they both have four stripes on their shoulders, indicating they are actual Captains, O6 rank. For Chandler this makes sense, given he now has a desk job. But Slattery? I assume he's now captain of the Nathan James, so shouldn't his rank stay Commander? Or is this a case of, he's the second highest ranking officer in the Navy, so why not a higher rank?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.