Livingston turning into a jellyfish in "Genesis".
hahaha. Now I have to go back and watch that scene. Never noticed it!
Livingston turning into a jellyfish in "Genesis".
It may have even been the first time in STAR TREK's history this was used, but of course, it pretty much became standard procedure when TNG came around. Not for the viewscreen as much as out the windows, generally.Interesting - I will look out for that next time.... when Kirk opens the movie by standing right in front of the viewscreen during his voiceover, that the stars within were actually a practical effect.
im pretty sure that static stars were comped in with bluescreens. Warp stars i assume were an optical effect, at least in TNG and early DS9; later DS9 filmed "live" video starsIt may have even been the first time in STAR TREK's history this was used, but of course, it pretty much became standard procedure when TNG came around. Not for the viewscreen as much as out the windows, generally.Interesting - I will look out for that next time.... when Kirk opens the movie by standing right in front of the viewscreen during his voiceover, that the stars within were actually a practical effect.
it pretty much became standard procedure when TNG came around. Not for the viewscreen as much as out the windows, generally.
cool!![]()
Yes, blue-screen was used when the warp-speed effect was used, but more often than not, you'll notice that the stars are either static, or they are moving very slowly left, or slowly right. These were achieved using an old theatre-style drapery technique, using sequins. You can often tell that, because of how some of the stars shining will blur out, whilst others shine very clean and bright, based on how the cloth they're sewn on will fold, or crease. "They" can get away using this technique, because of the foreground lighting on the set that drowns out the detail in the background, save for the light the sequins are reflecting.
I'm not aware of every aspect of STAR TREK, myself. When people like Therin of Andor, or Timby, for example share their behind-the-scenes knowledge, it's always enlightening and informative. Before computers took over FX, a lot of strange approaches were taken to produce images, especially for STAR TREK television.I recall reading somewhere that stars came from pinholes in a black velvet fabric with a light source behind. Maybe that was for shooting the model against a starfield?
Presumably they put lights under the foam and photographed it in darkness?For example, there was a huge foam mat that was sort of chewed up on the top and scraped away in all of these interesting swirling shapes which was used (I believe) for the Galaxy effect during TNG's "Space ... the final frontier" intro. in later seasons.
I think that was the way starfields were created before CGI. Even for shots that are composited later, you still need that starfield from somewhere.Ken Ralston did mention that even for the TOS movies, clear plastic was painted black with clear spots for "stars" to shine past when it was backlit, for planets in space and fly-bys and all that.
I never noticed back in the day that during the first season or two of TNG. That part of Sickbay was a redress of the Observation Lounge set. A few years later I read about it.
This past weekend I watched an episode on BBCA and noticed it. How could I have missed the covered windows?
The observation lounge wasn't built until season 2.
my bad, i misremembered. Maybe it was ten forward im thinking of?The observation lounge wasn't built until season 2.
Say what?
http://tng.trekcore.com/hd/albums/1x18/homesoil_hd_280.jpg
my bad, i misremembered. Maybe it was ten forward im thinking of?The observation lounge wasn't built until season 2.
Say what?
http://tng.trekcore.com/hd/albums/1x18/homesoil_hd_280.jpg
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.